Same flight number for outbound and return
Jan 5, 2012 | 2:11 pm
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,887
Same flight number for outbound and return
I noticed the other day that CO #1219 flies EWR-PBI at 8am and then returns, also as CO #1219 from PBI-EWR at 12pm. When looking up flight information on CO.com, you get:
Is this common? How is this "allowed"? Seems quite confusing operationally.
Continental Flight 1219
There are multiple segments for this flight. To receive flight and gate status information, please specify a segment.
New York/Newark, NJ (EWR - Liberty) to West Palm Beach, FL (PBI)
West Palm Beach, FL (PBI) to New York/Newark, NJ (EWR - Liberty)
There are multiple segments for this flight. To receive flight and gate status information, please specify a segment.
New York/Newark, NJ (EWR - Liberty) to West Palm Beach, FL (PBI)
West Palm Beach, FL (PBI) to New York/Newark, NJ (EWR - Liberty)
Jan 5, 2012 | 2:18 pm
#2
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: IAH
Programs: UA 1K/*G
Posts: 2,397
Becoming more common. Solution to a flight number shortage.
Also it's possible for both to be in the air at the same time.
Also it's possible for both to be in the air at the same time.
Jan 5, 2012 | 2:37 pm
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Jan 5, 2012 | 2:41 pm
#4
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: Dunkin' Rewards Boosted
Posts: 5,915
Lots of Charlie, Juliet, Kilo, Lima, Tango.
Jan 5, 2012 | 3:31 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,342
ANZ does it almost daily with flight 1 in UK and NZ airspace at the same time.
Jan 5, 2012 | 3:32 pm
#6
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: IAH
Programs: UA 1K/*G
Posts: 2,397
That is incorrect. Although UAL will usually put a suffix alpha character, it is common to operate two in the ATC system at the same time.
http://flightaware.com/about/faq.rvt#twoflights
http://flightaware.com/about/faq.rvt#twoflights
Why does FlightAware show two airlines flights operating simultaneously with the same flight number? Is that possible?
Unfortunately, this is not a bug. It seems that some airlines occasionally have duplicate flight numbers in the air at the same time with different origins and destinations. When tracking a flight that is in the air twice, the arrival/departure history will be accurate but the position, speed, and altitude will be unreliable.
Unfortunately, this is not a bug. It seems that some airlines occasionally have duplicate flight numbers in the air at the same time with different origins and destinations. When tracking a flight that is in the air twice, the arrival/departure history will be accurate but the position, speed, and altitude will be unreliable.
Jan 5, 2012 | 3:47 pm
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
That is incorrect. Although UAL will usually put a suffix alpha character, it is common to operate two in the ATC system at the same time.
http://flightaware.com/about/faq.rvt#twoflights
http://flightaware.com/about/faq.rvt#twoflights
Flight number and call sign are different though.
Jan 5, 2012 | 3:51 pm
#8
Moderator: Hawaii-based airlines & Hawai'i forums
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ka ʻĀpala Nui, Nuioka
Programs: NEXUS/Global Entry, Delta, United, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott, and Hertz
Posts: 18,719
Common practice for PMUA - especially United Express segments. I guess it wasn't as common on PMCO.
Jan 5, 2012 | 5:51 pm
#10
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,374
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9700; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.0.668 Mobile Safari/534.8+)
This is really annoying as it drives all kinds of third-party status tracking tools (WorldMate/TripIt) nuts. Wish they wouldn't.
This is really annoying as it drives all kinds of third-party status tracking tools (WorldMate/TripIt) nuts. Wish they wouldn't.
Jan 5, 2012 | 7:15 pm
#11
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,887
I think even direct one-stop flights were relatively uncommon on CO. Let alone a EWR-EWR itinerary with a stop in PBI.
Jan 5, 2012 | 7:57 pm
#12
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: IAH + SLC
Programs: UA - 1K, DL-DM, Hilton Gold, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium Lifetime
Posts: 2,926
Yeah, I noticed reference to this in a thread linked above in the PMUA forum from several years ago. (When I had zero interest whatsoever in reading that forum...although I still really don't...)
I think even direct one-stop flights were relatively uncommon on CO. Let alone a EWR-EWR itinerary with a stop in PBI.
I think even direct one-stop flights were relatively uncommon on CO. Let alone a EWR-EWR itinerary with a stop in PBI.
Jan 5, 2012 | 8:28 pm
#14
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: WAS-ish
Programs: UA 1K-MM + UC, Marriott Plat, National Exec
Posts: 1,343
(I wasn't sufficiently motivated to see if the fare would actually book on .bomb or CO.com. Also, identity of XXX is left as an exercise for the sufficiently motivated reader).
Jan 5, 2012 | 8:44 pm
#15
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: Dunkin' Rewards Boosted
Posts: 5,915
I noticed an interesting instance of this earlier today. Screwing around on ITA, looking for mileage runs, I noticed that XXX-BWI has a lot of routings that go XXX-IAH-EWR-BWI. Still not a good MR... except that there's a CO flight that goes IAH-SNA and then SNA-EWR, with the same flight number. And on ITA, it prices out the same as any other IAH-EWR -- for about 2000 extra miles.
(I wasn't sufficiently motivated to see if the fare would actually book on .bomb or CO.com. Also, identity of XXX is left as an exercise for the sufficiently motivated reader).
(I wasn't sufficiently motivated to see if the fare would actually book on .bomb or CO.com. Also, identity of XXX is left as an exercise for the sufficiently motivated reader).