Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

"Number of flights to display" dropdown has changed - why?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"Number of flights to display" dropdown has changed - why?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 1:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Wayne, NJ USA
Programs: UA 1 Million Miler, Lifetime United (Presidents) Club, Bonvoy Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 2,303
"Number of flights to display" dropdown has changed - why?

I believe the reservation drop-down options for # of flights to display has changed. It now shows:

DEFAULT
25
50

Not sure why they changed it.

?
elitefreak is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 2:44 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Allowing there to be a "default" suggests that they'll let you actually have a setting and stick to it. On top of that, most of the time it present too few options anyways so starting with only 10 seems inefficient for most customers, though probably better for their back-end systems.

And, not for nothing, but does it really matter? I know that change can be difficult some times, but this one doesn't seem all that bad.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 7:37 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Wayne, NJ USA
Programs: UA 1 Million Miler, Lifetime United (Presidents) Club, Bonvoy Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 2,303
Originally Posted by sbm12
Allowing there to be a "default" suggests that they'll let you actually have a setting and stick to it. On top of that, most of the time it present too few options anyways so starting with only 10 seems inefficient for most customers, though probably better for their back-end systems.

And, not for nothing, but does it really matter? I know that change can be difficult some times, but this one doesn't seem all that bad.
Didn't say it was bad . . . just wondered why they bothered to change it. The fact that someone took the time (and expense) to change it indicates there was some justification for the change. But what could that be?
elitefreak is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.