Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Colgan Computer Crash

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 8:03 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central NJ (Usually EWR but sometimes PHL)
Programs: UA-1K w/2MM & lifetime U-Club; Marriott-Lifetime Titanium; IHG-Diamond; National-Exec. Elite
Posts: 2,553
It could have just been a computer crash of that one Q-400's system. Colgan has a policy that if the on-board computer needs to be rebooted, there can't be any passengers on the plane while they're doing it.

One time about 5 minutes before scheduled departure (I think in RDU but I could be wrong), we were all told to exit the aircraft but leave carry-on's where they were and not leave the gate area. About 5 minutes after exiting, we re-boarded and wound up taking off around 20 minutes late.

Based on the OP's story and the comment about the flight status, I'm willing to bet this is what happened.
Steve GadFly is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 12:57 pm
  #17  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
Originally Posted by Steve GadFly
It could have just been a computer crash of that one Q-400's system. Colgan has a policy that if the on-board computer needs to be rebooted, there can't be any passengers on the plane while they're doing it.
That sounds nuts. Any idea why they have this policy?

Do the Q-400's landing gear cycle when you do a three-finger-salute to their computers?
ralfp is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 1:18 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central NJ (Usually EWR but sometimes PHL)
Programs: UA-1K w/2MM & lifetime U-Club; Marriott-Lifetime Titanium; IHG-Diamond; National-Exec. Elite
Posts: 2,553
I couldn't tell you why they have this policy......the GA and FA seemed to think it was just as as we do.
Steve GadFly is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 1:21 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
Originally Posted by Steve GadFly
It could have just been a computer crash of that one Q-400's system. Colgan has a policy that if the on-board computer needs to be rebooted, there can't be any passengers on the plane while they're doing it.
Easy to understand why. Colgan does not want the pax witnessing this ritual...do you really want to see electrical leads get glued to a hamster's a$$?
ConciergeMike is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 1:46 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central NJ (Usually EWR but sometimes PHL)
Programs: UA-1K w/2MM & lifetime U-Club; Marriott-Lifetime Titanium; IHG-Diamond; National-Exec. Elite
Posts: 2,553
Steve GadFly is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 2:12 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PHL/EWR
Programs: UA, AA
Posts: 1,821
What do they do with the passengers if the computer crashes midflight?
PSU Mudder is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 2:13 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Under the Liberty Visual to 27L at PHL. Stranger in a strange land - a Devils fan in Flyers country.
Programs: PWP Le Chancelier des Clefs d'Or || Sarcasm, Anti-Stupidity, Obscure References top tier member.
Posts: 24,061
Originally Posted by PSU Mudder
What do they do with the passengers if the computer crashes midflight?
That's why they board Febreze bottles. There's no choice at that point and a greater risk of unpleasant odor related to hamster maintenance.
ConciergeMike is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 2:55 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,660
Originally Posted by ralfp
That sounds nuts. Any idea why they have this policy?
Not sure if it is indeed the case or not, but if so......

I would suspect it might have something to do with one of the warning systems, or the ability to evacuate the aircraft while on the ground. I'm just thinking out loud here, but they might have to take ALL electric power off of the aircraft in order to reset the computer. If that's the case, it might possibly render fire detection systems, emergency lighting, et al inop.

I have no clue about Q400 systems. The FAA doesn't allow us to have folks onboard when certain systems are inop (read: the ability to evacuate), so there might be a scenario that mandates the use of such a rule (if one does indeed exist).

DRW

I too took a double take at the thread title........'Colgan computer crash' is only one letter off from 'Colgan commuter crash'.
doobierw is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2010 | 8:04 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: at 35,000 feet
Programs: WN A-List; Hyatt Glob: CC/HH Gold, Hertz 5*
Posts: 1,473
This summer, my Colgan flight was running late from EWR and I got rebooked on US at the ticket counter without even having to ask for it. They were right though, I would have missed my connection in EWR by about 10 min.

Another anecdote, several years ago while waiting at the gate in DTW with a fully loaded KLM MD-11 they had to reboot. Everything went dark for about 5 minutes, they did their checks and we were good to go. Offloading a full MD-11 and reboarding would have been a major delay, not to mention any immigration hassles.
robbert is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.