Just to be fair, I think I'm going to start threads for everyone else who hasn't posted this week.

Koko writes: Would that be THIS ONE?

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/wink.gif

it is not difficult to communicate with doc. Here is his email-address: [email protected]

A non-rumour answer to where Doc is:

He is reading FT every now and then but not so interested in being part of FT as he feels the timeouts were not handled equally.

I cannot blame him for one second and would be long done with FT if it had been me. The inequity is huge.

Dorian

Come on kokodrunk, don't be making stuff up just because you were too inebriated to remember the details ... you were standing right *next* to me at the front desk of theHampton Inn when I checked in around 3:00 AM ... or do you not remember that part?

Sorry, Becky. Guess I was too busy making an ... of myself http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif

Sure, always! http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/biggrin.gif

I haven't been concerned about where doc is, etc. I do enjoy reading his posts. IMHO it is only "his" business when he wants to/not want to post on FT. NOT my business or anyone else's business where doc is, etc. I may have the pleasure to meet doc someday.

Perhaps we should ask "kid" if he knows when Doc will post again?

Oh, and Gaucho100K, just to set the record straight, you claimed you were offended by something factual I posted about another website. I apologized to you in public, and in a private e-mail, as no offense to you was meant. You never had the courtesy to reply to that e-mail. I have never, NEVER said "no" to anyone who politely asked me to apologize because something I wrote offended them.



[This message has been edited by NJDavid (edited 03-23-2002).]

Offensive? You mean calling you, NJDavid, a TOS violator?

Dorian

The reference to kid is really uncalled for.

And since Randy has stated above that Gaucho100K is unable to respond to this thread (i.e. timedout) what is the purpose of posting a followup directed to him here - shouldn't that be done by email, since he is unable to respond?

I don't understand. Why is saying that one flyertalker might know something about another flyertalker uncalled for. There's nothing illegal and pathetic going on that our community should know about, is there?

I did not realize that he may have been in that situation when I made my post. I therefore edited my request to have him remove the personal attack on me within it. I do however wish to "set the record straight" on the issue that he has raised more than once, again, for the benefit of our community.

I have e-mailed him with no response, just as I have e-mailed Randy about Dorian's crusade of continuing personal attacks against me.

It is baiting and using the same shadow games of a word here and there that Randy had told you and me that he does not want on FT.

[This message has been edited by PG (edited 03-24-2002).]

I respectfully disagree.

I suggested we ask a flyertalker "kid" if he knew about Doc. Kid has posted since Doc was in timeout. It is a plain, sunshine filled suggestion. If you know otherwise, please tell all of us.

the "shadow games" Randy referred to are all of the veiled references to me in the beginning of this thread, actions I humbly request you go back and edit.

Actually, all of your last few posts and my replies have no place on Flyertalk. You should be e-mailing me these issues, not grandstanding. Please delete your last few posts and "take this outside." if you do so, I will as well.


[This message has been edited by NJDavid (edited 03-25-2002).]

Yes I respectfully disagree too.

My posts were in response to yours and would not have been here if you had not posted. Delete your posts and I'll delete my followups.