Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Asia > China
Reload this Page >

Obama and Visa fee

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Obama and Visa fee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 5:32 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Programs: AA Platinum, US Airways, SWA
Posts: 244
Obama and Visa fee

Is it likely that the Obama administration will lower the visa fee from countries like China, Brazil and Chile? If so, when might that happen, and how long would you expect it to take for those countries to reciprocate?
MinetaFlyer is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 10:00 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,231
Not sure why you'd think Obama will lower the Visa fee. I guess you can spin a theory that because he lived briefly overseas and is more interested in "pleasing the world" he'll see the "error of our ways" and lower the US entry fee.

Personally, I wouldn't bet on it.
iahphx is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 2:19 am
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 46,370
Originally Posted by iahphx
Not sure why you'd think Obama will lower the Visa fee.
I'll second this. OP: What gives you reason to believe that this idea is even on the table?
moondog is online now  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 11:10 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PVD
Programs: Priority Club Plat
Posts: 12,312
Originally Posted by moondog
I'll second this. OP: What gives you reason to believe that this idea is even on the table?
Some people believe the current administration will reverse every thing that the previous one has done.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 11:15 am
  #5  
Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
Can't erase the casualties in Iraq.
anacapamalibu is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 11:21 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PVD
Programs: Priority Club Plat
Posts: 12,312
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
Can't erase the casualties in Iraq.
Guess I should have said, it will "try to reverse"...
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 11:25 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
Originally Posted by MinetaFlyer
Is it likely that the Obama administration will lower the visa fee from countries like China, Brazil and Chile? If so, when might that happen, and how long would you expect it to take for those countries to reciprocate?
If I recall correctly, the rule that applicants for US visas must pay for the full cost of processing--hence the relatively high fees--was enacted by the legislature (Congress), not by executive action of the President. So Obama cannot unilaterally reverse or amend this law.

Don't bet on the law changing. Except as with all things, the fees are likely to go up over time, not down.
jiejie is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 11:29 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB PLT again afater a decade as plebian
Posts: 22,942
Originally Posted by MinetaFlyer
Is it likely that the Obama administration will lower the visa fee from countries like China, Brazil and Chile? If so, when might that happen, and how long would you expect it to take for those countries to reciprocate?
Doubt it. I think Congress first set this one as part of a budget-balancing item (so he`ll have to ask them to reduce it) a long time ago and also as part of the user pays doctrine. Canada and the U.K. have bought into this doctrine.
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:25 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
Doubt it. I think Congress first set this one as part of a budget-balancing item (so he`ll have to ask them to reduce it) a long time ago and also as part of the user pays doctrine. Canada and the U.K. have bought into this doctrine.
Agreed.

We do a lot more checking on visas than most countries do. Of course our visas are expensive.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 7:02 pm
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 46,370
Originally Posted by jiejie
If I recall correctly, the rule that applicants for US visas must pay for the full cost of processing
This was my thinking when I posted. As everyone knows, DHS has an enormous budget; visa fees are expected to cover their direct and indirect impacts upon this budget. If anything, I would guess that the $130 figure is a bit on the low side (in light of inelastic demand).

No matter how much our new president dislikes the DHS, he's not going to make it disappear overnight. Moreover, I couldn't imagine (in my wildest dreams) that he'd offload any more administrative costs onto US tax payers.
moondog is online now  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 11:54 am
  #11  
Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
Better to travel to China now. year 2005 RMB/dollar 8.2/1 now 5.84/1 edited (6.84)/1
According to Obama their currency is manipulated, so might adjust to 4 or less/1.

So even if visa fee US to China dropped in half, total cost for a trip to China would increase due to the exchange rate change.

Last edited by anacapamalibu; Jan 24, 2009 at 12:22 pm
anacapamalibu is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 11:59 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 46,370
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
Better to travel to China now. year 2005 RMB/dollar 8.2/1 now 5.84/1
According to Obama their currency is manipulated, so might adjust to 4 or less/1.

So even if visa fee US to China dropped in half, total cost for a trip to China would increase due to the exchange rate change.
I'm seeing 6.84070 on xe.com.
moondog is online now  
Old Jan 24, 2009 | 12:20 pm
  #13  
Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
Originally Posted by moondog
I'm seeing 6.84070 on xe.com.
That's right. 6.84

I hope Obama goes to visit China soon. I believe he will make a good impression with the Chinese and he will enjoy their food.
anacapamalibu is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 1:01 am
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PVD
Programs: Priority Club Plat
Posts: 12,312
From all the analysts and pundits I've been reading, most expect the relationship between US and China to be more rocky with the new administration - from trade deficit figure, food safety, to human rights records...

I don't know why some of you here think it'd be the opposite.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 9:43 am
  #15  
Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
Originally Posted by rkkwan
From all the analysts and pundits I've been reading, most expect the relationship between US and China to be more rocky with the new administration - from trade deficit figure, food safety, to human rights records...

I don't know why some of you here think it'd be the opposite.
Obama has family ties to China. His half brother lives there and is married to
a Chinese woman. Not that this in itself makes a difference, but I believe its
unique to a US president.
anacapamalibu is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.