Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Asia > China
Reload this Page >

Iphone to China

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Iphone to China

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2014 | 7:29 pm
  #16  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: China and Canada
Posts: 1,894
Anything over 2000RMB that will stay in China needs to be declared.
http://shanghai.customs.gov.cn/Default.aspx?tabid=5674
JPDM is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2014 | 7:42 pm
  #17  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 46,323
Originally Posted by JPDM
Anything over 2000RMB that will stay in China needs to be declared.
http://shanghai.customs.gov.cn/Default.aspx?tabid=5674
Two boxed units/person seems to be the de facto tolerance, at least in Shenzhen. Customs at Shenzhen Bay has been extremely slow this week because of the iPhone 6, but they aren't messing with small the two-unit crowd.

Last edited by moondog; Sep 25, 2014 at 9:53 pm
moondog is offline  
Old Sep 25, 2014 | 9:41 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Macau, Hong Kong, Shanghai
Posts: 648
Originally Posted by trueblu
...The chance of being stopped is low, but if it occurs, you run the risk of confiscation.

tb
I never got anything confiscated (over land from HK and Macau) In the few cases I got checked I had to decide whether to pay the duty or carry it back.
They do keep records though and know exactly about any past incident.
HKtraveller is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2014 | 7:16 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego
Programs: UA 1K MM, SPG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 96
In my experience large baggage *always* goes through the xray when taking the land border crossings from HK into China. But flying into Pudong or BJ airports - never once have I been asked to xray my bags.
cooljw is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2014 | 7:48 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by cooljw
In my experience large baggage *always* goes through the xray when taking the land border crossings from HK into China. But flying into Pudong or BJ airports - never once have I been asked to xray my bags.
One x-ray in Shanghai, I don't recall if it was PuDong or not.

There were special circumstances involved, though--in the eyes of the customs official I was wheeling out more luggage than normal which caught his eye. Then the fact that my entry stamp was two days earlier drew more attention.

At that point my wife caught up (I had finally started walking to get her to quit talking to the baggage people forever) and explained that the airline left our bags behind, we were just picking them up now. (She's a native speaker, I speak a couple of dozen words with a bad enough accent that people likely won't understand me so I left the explanation to her.) End of inspection.

Usually they don't look no matter what. There's a nuke alarm there, my wife tripped it and nobody responded. After waiting a bit to see if anyone was going to give us directions we finally went on out. (While there was a second detector that actually was manned it's before the formalities and thus doesn't scan your checked baggage. Even there they didn't do the elementary test of separating her from her carry-ons and sweeping a geiger counter over her to see if the source was dispersed {leftover from medical imaging} or a point source. They simply accepted her word that it was from a heart scan despite having left the card from the lab behind.)
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2014 | 4:54 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,538
there are x-rays at PVG which are used from time to time.

Sometimes it is just used for individuals, sometimes everyone has to go through them (the latter is rare).

I think last time we were subjected to 'everyone' they were looking for baby formula.
LHR/MEL/Europe FF is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2014 | 10:49 pm
  #22  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: China and Canada
Posts: 1,894
But they are cracking down on iPhones: http://www.ecns.cn/2014/09-25/136058.shtml
JPDM is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2014 | 6:59 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 11,078
Originally Posted by JPDM
But they are cracking down on iPhones: http://www.ecns.cn/2014/09-25/136058.shtml
That has always been the case.

Crack down on inbound smuggling until the availability in China is normal.

There are a lot of Asian wealth from arbitraging price differential with anything and everything.
tentseller is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2014 | 5:44 pm
  #24  
Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
Originally Posted by tentseller
There are a lot of Asian wealth from arbitraging price differential with anything and everything.
I guess if you can repatriate refugees, currency, human remains, cultural items, battlefield caualties.. you can surely repatriate an iPhone.
anacapamalibu is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2014 | 6:54 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 11,078
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
I guess if you can repatriate refugees, currency, human remains, cultural items, battlefield caualties.. you can surely repatriate an iPhone.
Not trying to be funny but with family roots spanning HK, Chinese Village and North of the Bay area we did bones shipment from US to China during the late Qing dynasty (19th century).
tentseller is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2014 | 7:47 pm
  #26  
Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
Originally Posted by tentseller
Not trying to be funny but with family roots spanning HK, Chinese Village and North of the Bay area we did bones shipment from US to China during the late Qing dynasty (19th century).
That definately fits the definition of returning to the country of origin.
anacapamalibu is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2014 | 8:03 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 11,078
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
That definately fits the definition of returning to the country of origin.
The joke among Chinese migrant worker in US during the 19th century was "The only way they let you stay is if you die". It was also the wish of all that they be buried at ancestry site back in China

They were buried in US for seven years. After that the bones were exhumed, boxed and shipped back to relatives in China via HK.
tentseller is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2014 | 8:40 pm
  #28  
Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
Originally Posted by tentseller
The joke among Chinese migrant worker in US during the 19th century was "The only way they let you stay is if you die". It was also the wish of all that they be buried at ancestry site back in China

They were buried in US for seven years. After that the bones were exhumed, boxed and shipped back to relatives in China via HK.
Hope you understand.

H. RES. 683

That the House of Representatives regrets the passage of legislation that adversely affected people of Chinese origin in the United States because of their ethnicity.

Nothing in this resolution may be construed or relied on to authorize or support any claim, including but not limited to constitutionally based claims, claims for monetary compensation or claims for equitable relief against the United States or any other party, or serve as a settlement of any claim against the United States.
anacapamalibu is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2014 | 9:04 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 11,078
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
Hope you understand.

H. RES. 683

That the House of Representatives regrets the passage of legislation that adversely affected people of Chinese origin in the United States because of their ethnicity.

Nothing in this resolution may be construed or relied on to authorize or support any claim, including but not limited to constitutionally based claims, claims for monetary compensation or claims for equitable relief against the United States or any other party, or serve as a settlement of any claim against the United States.
No hard feelings
tentseller is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.