And you thought liquid checks were bad....Here come powders
Aug 20, 2009, 12:49 am
#46
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Aug 20, 2009, 1:20 am
#47
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Were you looking to support the TSA by being dismissive of what the OP said is coming? It sure seems so.
So as the TSA puts this into place, will you be critical or supportive of this TSA move too?
ROTFLOL
So as the TSA puts this into place, will you be critical or supportive of this TSA move too?
ROTFLOL
Aug 20, 2009, 1:21 am
#48
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Aug 20, 2009, 3:02 am
#49
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
Show me one CREDIBLE threat to USA-based commercial aviation that even purports to be remotely applicable to this bull....
Once again, let's focus on the infinitesimal possibilities and ignore the best ways to test for these items. There are so many glaring fracking holes in the theater that is TSA. But, no, let's shove the taxpayers and traveling public further over the table and give them a royal anal shafting without the benefit of lubrication and without concern for anyone's rights. Because that is what the TSA does...no real security, just anal-plowing and Constitution-riddling window dressing.
More fracking lipstick on a pig.
Aug 20, 2009, 4:50 am
#50
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,604
I'm actually beginning to believe that Spiff might be right.
Aug 20, 2009, 4:57 am
#51
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
I saw this happening at Dulles just the other day.
Aug 20, 2009, 5:46 am
#53
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
let's see -- ammonium perchlorate is the oxidizer used in solid rocket propellant. There are two plants in nevada which produce it. This substance must be mixed in just the right proportion to the fuel, mixed with other inert chemicals, heated up to the consistency of cake batter, and carefully poured into a mold.
i saw this happening at dulles just the other day.
i saw this happening at dulles just the other day.
Last edited by Superguy; Aug 20, 2009 at 5:48 am Reason: FT editor keeps putting things in lower case :td:
Aug 20, 2009, 6:07 am
#54
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
That if one is going to comment on something in public, one should know something about the subject first. Globalsecurity.com has a pretty good library on the subject of explosives and some other things of interest to the community here.
I am no explosives expert, but I can learn quite a bit from reading at sites like this.
I am no explosives expert, but I can learn quite a bit from reading at sites like this.
Aug 20, 2009, 7:18 am
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,114
That if one is going to comment on something in public, one should know something about the subject first. Globalsecurity.com has a pretty good library on the subject of explosives and some other things of interest to the community here.
I am no explosives expert, but I can learn quite a bit from reading at sites like this.
I am no explosives expert, but I can learn quite a bit from reading at sites like this.
Aug 20, 2009, 7:56 am
#56
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
From a spokesperson:
So we don't have time to test your LGA's, but we have time to test your powders? 
There is not a new blanket prohibition of powders. Basically, you may be subjected to additional screening if you have powders or granular substances in your baggage. In addition, you may be asked to open the container to complete the screening process.
Aug 20, 2009, 8:14 am
#57
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,485
Hopefully, given that it would probably make your bag catch fire/explode.
Perhaps you're thinking of Gallium: hold it close and it will melt (melting point above room temp but below body temperature). It's also a lot less reactive than sodium.
Perhaps you're thinking of Gallium: hold it close and it will melt (melting point above room temp but below body temperature). It's also a lot less reactive than sodium.
Aug 20, 2009, 8:22 am
#58
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The list of retail store-purchased items that "may" be subjected to the "powder checks" can be quite long. So on what basis will the TSA decide whose "powder" is to be opened/checked and whose "powder" is not to be opened.
Will the TSA person open the container themselves? Watch out for flying powder.
Perhaps this is the TSA's idea for yet another phase in the Perpetual Right to Employment Act of 2001 -- this time it's a 2009 amendment for janitorial services.
Will the TSA person open the container themselves? Watch out for flying powder.
Perhaps this is the TSA's idea for yet another phase in the Perpetual Right to Employment Act of 2001 -- this time it's a 2009 amendment for janitorial services.
Aug 20, 2009, 8:50 am
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,114
Sodium is fairly safe as long as it is keep dry.
Aug 20, 2009, 9:26 am
#60
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,485
And dynamite is quite safe until you detonate it... the point is that sodium metal in any quantity above a trace amount should probably be prohibited in carry-on and checked luggage (I assume it is already prohibited), though I'm not sure the real danger it poses (e.g what would flushing a 1cm cube do?)
(This is coming from a more Spiff-leaning FT member.)
(This is coming from a more Spiff-leaning FT member.)