![]() |
Quiet protest
Other than marking your freedom bag with a funny slogan, is there any other ways to protest ridiculus security screening procedures without getting denied entry into the fortress of doom?
|
Refuse to show my ID to anyone.
Educate the world as best I can about how stupid the policies are and, more importantly, what they actually are. The fact that the TSA still insists ID is "required" when in reality it is meerly requested is a great example of why we need to do a better job of educating others rather than just bemoaning the situation around here. |
Any Canadians know if ID checking is optional at Canadian airports as well?
Edit: Nevermind Canadians DO : http://www.passengerprotect.gc.ca/identity.html. Funny, most Canucks say America is like a police state and yet we're the ones that required ID to fly and the US doesn't. |
Originally Posted by maniac78
(Post 9646004)
Any Canadians know if ID checking is optional at Canadian airports as well?
Transborder (to the US) with preclearance you have to provide ID to the US ICE (Immigration) officer before admittance even to the security check. * they are in fact prohibited by law from doing so, and unlike the TSA do not make up the rules for themselves. Mostly. |
In the US you can fly domestically without ID. In Canada you cannot according to Transport Canada regulations. Anyway the question was is there any way to make their jobs harder and still fly?
|
You should also add in without slowing down all of those people behind you to your pointless activity. It would be sort of ironic if you came up with ideas on how to protest about how slow security policies have made things by slowing down security policies even more.
|
Originally Posted by thegeneral
(Post 9646428)
You should also add in without slowing down all of those people behind you to your pointless activity. It would be sort of ironic if you came up with ideas on how to protest about how slow security policies have made things by slowing down security policies even more.
|
Genral,
As others will point out... Slowing things down for everyone is a legit form of protest. In fact, not showing ID is actually just following the rules. Not the rules that the powers that be want you to, but following the rules to make a point. ID does not equal security. |
Originally Posted by maniac78
(Post 9646454)
Actually I think slowing down security is precisely what's needed. If it starts to take hours to get through security I think you'll see some changes.
Indeed, this may just be the only way change can come. Civil disobedience has to affect everyone, not just those protesting and their "oppressors" or it is actually rather ineffective. A diner sit-in affected the diner owner and its patrons, in addition to those sitting there. The march to vote in Texas earlier this year disrupted traffic on the highway, in addition to those marching. You get the idea. I do not go out of my way to be slower above and beyond the SSSS process (though I do require clean gloves), but I will continue to make things more difficult for the TSA, consuming their resources in hopes that others are also affected and begin to demand change. |
So I think one way I'll protest is by presenting the GA with my library card and my health card which are both government issued. They'll surely stop me and say I need photo ID to which I'll respond read the regs again which will surely slow down boarding.
I'll also give the CATSA guy my printed boarding card and I'll ask him or her to keep it or throw it away as I've made several copies. I'll "forget" to take out the freedom bag and I'll have the usual "this bag is keeping us all safe" written on it. All electronics will remain in my carry on. I'll put a liter of water in my bag with a label on it saying "medicinal water" on it and see if they like that. If they don't like it I'll stand there holding up the line while drinking the water. I'll not empty my pockets, take off my shoes or anything before going through the brain wave analyzer. Being wanded will ensure my fellow passengers are safer anyway. |
Actually I think slowing down security is precisely what's needed. If it starts to take hours to get through security I think you'll see some changes. |
Originally Posted by thegeneral
(Post 9646428)
You should also add in without slowing down all of those people behind you to your pointless activity. It would be sort of ironic if you came up with ideas on how to protest about how slow security policies have made things by slowing down security policies even more.
Don't occupy those lunch counter seats, you might inconvenience others with your pointless activity! Don't take those seats in front of the bus, you might inconvenience others with your pointless activity! Don't gather in groups of more than three when holding a protest! You might inconvenience others with your pointless activity. |
I don't mind a good protest one way or the other, but what if I don't want to miss my plane in the process?
I have once seen a guy hand over two baggies of liquids just squirted into the baggies. The TSO's didn't seem to care, just shrugged there shoulders and ran the stuff through the x-ray. Not the response he was looking for I am thinking. |
Originally Posted by thegeneral
(Post 9646428)
You should also add in without slowing down all of those people behind you to your pointless activity. It would be sort of ironic if you came up with ideas on how to protest about how slow security policies have made things by slowing down security policies even more.
|
Originally Posted by NotThereYet
(Post 9647121)
I don't mind a good protest one way or the other, but what if I don't want to miss my plane in the process?
I have once seen a guy hand over two baggies of liquids just squirted into the baggies. The TSO's didn't seem to care, just shrugged there shoulders and ran the stuff through the x-ray. Not the response he was looking for I am thinking. |
The TSO's didn't seem to care, just shrugged there shoulders and ran the stuff through the x-ray. Slowing things down for the people behind you may cause one of your fellow travelers to miss their flight, but it's not going to harm or even inconvenience the TSOs personally. Having been a lobbyist in a previous life :cool: I can tell you that change will come when elected officials believe their stance on an issue is of burning importance to their constituents, OR someone offers them bushel baskets full of money! Lacking cash, a large, orchestrated protest might attract some attention and spark a revolt, but short of that .... :td: |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9647214)
Perzactly. So, we have to SSSS screen an extra PAX because they didn't wanna show ID. Why should we care? It's not like we get to leave early if we get everyone through really fast!
Slowing things down for the people behind you may cause one of your fellow travelers to miss their flight, but it's not going to harm or even inconvenience the TSOs personally. Having been a lobbyist in a previous life :cool: I can tell you that change will come when elected officials believe their stance on an issue is of burning importance to their constituents, OR someone offers them bushel baskets full of money! Lacking cash, a large, orchestrated protest might attract some attention and spark a revolt, but short of that .... :td: Whatever I can do to make sure your organization is shut down, either fiscally (which is political based) or by personnel with your brethren leaving in droves. Oh, and do initiate a SPOT conversation with me next time, I'll take photos of you and put it on my web pages (with download capability). And I almost forgot, have a nice day. |
Paul, the only person you're inconveniencing is yourself.
Those screeners are getting paid, whether they're patting you down or standing around in the break room drinking coffee. If you think you somehow "cost" the government more than it would have spent otherwise by requesting a private search, you're mistaken. If you think you're going to get droves of people to volunteer for secondaries, in order to somehow cripple the system, I think you're mistaken, although you are welcome to try! The only effective way to fight a battle is to identify who has the power to actually change the situation at hand. Then target that person or entity! In the case of the TSA, it's Congress. To influence Congress, you need votes or cash. Lacking either, you're just wasting your time. |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9647505)
Paul, the only person you're inconveniencing is yourself.
Those screeners are getting paid, whether they're patting you down or standing around in the break room drinking coffee. If you think you somehow "cost" the government more than it would have spent otherwise by requesting a private search, you're mistaken. If you think you're going to get droves of people to volunteer for secondaries, in order to somehow cripple the system, I think you're mistaken, although you are welcome to try! The only effective way to fight a battle is to identify who has the power to actually change the situation at hand. Then target that person or entity! In the case of the TSA, it's Congress. To influence Congress, you need votes or cash. Lacking either, you're just wasting your time. Oh and I almost forgot, I use Fort Lauderdale (FLL) and Palm Beach (PBI) as departure airports when on the road. By any chance can I schedule a training appointment near you (usually a week at a time) so that I can use your airport as the return segment? Quite happy to. I don't mind as I get to the airport 2 hours prior to flight anyway, as your agency suggests that I do. I'm just trying to be productive for that 1 hour and 30 minutes. |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9647505)
Lacking either, you're just wasting your time.
"I was only doing my job"...whatever...:td: |
"But it can be very effective. I end up with SSSS on my boarding pass (or do not wish to show ID). Fine I get a secondary. But I also ask for private pat down, and private search of my carry-on, and of course that means 3 TSA screeners will be busy for 15 minutes rather than 1 for 2 minutes. The TSA spends more than the $5 they charged me for the new & improved security fee."
The end result of which will be slower lines, a much slower process for you involving an invasive search. That's the sort of thing I'd imagine someone like yourself is sort of against in the first place. That's, err, rather smart. :rolleyes: "Whatever I can do to make sure your organization is shut down, either fiscally (which is political based) or by personnel with your brethren leaving in droves." Sadly, were your actions to accomplish anything other than annoy your fellow passengers, they'd only serve to cause the TSA to hire more screeners. This in turn would mean a higher fee and a larger TSA. Just to put into context since you don't seem to be able to grasp what you're doing. Your actions are akin to protesting the high price of fuel by driving more. |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9647214)
Perzactly. So, we have to SSSS screen an extra PAX because they didn't wanna show ID. Why should we care? It's not like we get to leave early if we get everyone through really fast!
Slowing things down for the people behind you may cause one of your fellow travelers to miss their flight, but it's not going to harm or even inconvenience the TSOs personally. |
Originally Posted by thegeneral
(Post 9648258)
"But it can be very effective. I end up with SSSS on my boarding pass (or do not wish to show ID). Fine I get a secondary. But I also ask for private pat down, and private search of my carry-on, and of course that means 3 TSA screeners will be busy for 15 minutes rather than 1 for 2 minutes. The TSA spends more than the $5 they charged me for the new & improved security fee."
The end result of which will be slower lines, a much slower process for you involving an invasive search. That's the sort of thing I'd imagine someone like yourself is sort of against in the first place. That's, err, rather smart. :rolleyes: "Whatever I can do to make sure your organization is shut down, either fiscally (which is political based) or by personnel with your brethren leaving in droves." Sadly, were your actions to accomplish anything other than annoy your fellow passengers, they'd only serve to cause the TSA to hire more screeners. This in turn would mean a higher fee and a larger TSA. Just to put into context since you don't seem to be able to grasp what you're doing. Your actions are akin to protesting the high price of fuel by driving more. Do enjoy your travels. I do enjoy mine. I have a lot of satisfaction each time a TSA screener can remember me for their screw up in their own procedure. |
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 9647031)
That's right!
Don't take those seats in front of the bus, you might inconvenience others with your pointless activity! |
Originally Posted by hiltonhead
(Post 9648319)
Yet another Rosa Parks reference...:rolleyes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts Which historical reference will you associate my analogy now? |
Originally Posted by thegeneral
(Post 9648258)
"But it can be very effective. I end up with SSSS on my boarding pass (or do not wish to show ID). Fine I get a secondary. But I also ask for private pat down, and private search of my carry-on, and of course that means 3 TSA screeners will be busy for 15 minutes rather than 1 for 2 minutes. The TSA spends more than the $5 they charged me for the new & improved security fee."
The end result of which will be slower lines, a much slower process for you involving an invasive search. That's the sort of thing I'd imagine someone like yourself is sort of against in the first place. That's, err, rather smart. :rolleyes: "Whatever I can do to make sure your organization is shut down, either fiscally (which is political based) or by personnel with your brethren leaving in droves." Sadly, were your actions to accomplish anything other than annoy your fellow passengers, they'd only serve to cause the TSA to hire more screeners. This in turn would mean a higher fee and a larger TSA. Just to put into context since you don't seem to be able to grasp what you're doing. Your actions are akin to protesting the high price of fuel by driving more. Now will a single person going through security with no ID/etc change anything? No, but you bet if large numbers of people were organized and did something similar, or did it on an ongoing basis, there would be media attention. Would the TSA hire more TSO's? Perhaps, but undoubtably there would at least be local media attention if the security line became super long, or it was noted that security screening procedures changed in order to cope at a local airport. |
Now will a single person going through security with no ID/etc change anything? No, but you bet if large numbers of people were organized and did something similar, or did it on an ongoing basis, there would be media attention. The only problem is, how many people are going to find the TSA so offensive as to be willing to participate in any sort of mass protect? Most people probably are going to do a quick mental cost-benefit analysis and decide it isn't worth the trouble, especially if it involves risking the possibility of missing their flight. Airline security is a minor blip on the radar screen for most people. And, sorry, but asking for a full-body pat down in lieu of going through the metal detector isn't going to make screeners view you as some sort of rebel protester ... it's more likely we'll think you're a pervert who just likes being touched by another man! :p |
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 9646500)
:-: ^ :-: ^ :-: ^
Indeed, this may just be the only way change can come. Civil disobedience has to affect everyone, not just those protesting and their "oppressors" or it is actually rather ineffective. A diner sit-in affected the diner owner and its patrons, in addition to those sitting there. The march to vote in Texas earlier this year disrupted traffic on the highway, in addition to those marching. You get the idea. I do not go out of my way to be slower above and beyond the SSSS process (though I do require clean gloves), but I will continue to make things more difficult for the TSA, consuming their resources in hopes that others are also affected and begin to demand change. Cheers Howie |
Originally Posted by stockmanjr
(Post 9648992)
By delaying people most likely your only going to get people pissed off at you and not get your point across about the TSA...
|
Originally Posted by knotyeagle
(Post 9648354)
You would not mind then if your state reimposed the poll tax would you? Literacy test to vote? Proof of property ownership to register? Loyalty oaths? Perhaps bringing back the Alien & Sedition act would work out well for you as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts Which historical reference will you associate my analogy now? |
Originally Posted by thegeneral
(Post 9648258)
The end result of which will be slower lines, a much slower process for you involving an invasive search. That's the sort of thing I'd imagine someone like yourself is sort of against in the first place. That's, err, rather smart. :rolleyes:
Sadly, were your actions to accomplish anything other than annoy your fellow passengers, they'd only serve to cause the TSA to hire more screeners. This in turn would mean a higher fee and a larger TSA. Just to put into context since you don't seem to be able to grasp what you're doing. Your actions are akin to protesting the high price of fuel by driving more. |
Originally Posted by hiltonhead
(Post 9649428)
The same government entity that a large portion of the public have no problem with...
|
Originally Posted by knotyeagle
(Post 9648354)
You would not mind then if your state reimposed the poll tax would you? Literacy test to vote? Proof of property ownership to register? Loyalty oaths? Perhaps bringing back the Alien & Sedition act would work out well for you as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts Which historical reference will you associate my analogy now? |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9648917)
... it's more likely we'll think you're a pervert who just likes being touched by another man! :p
|
In Canada the stupidity of our version of the TSA is astounding. That's why I'm making it my mission in life to delay every security line I ever enter into. You should see these retards in action. They don't even try to pretend really.
They've got the security line right next to the exit door for arrivals at my airport. The bugger flippers and cleaning staff just swipe their passes and walk on through the exit, bypassing security. You see them walk out of the terminal have a smoke and then walk on back waving to the security people. No one could possibly claim that this is secure at all and yet we have to go through this charade. We pay $12 each way for this. |
Would that suspicion require you to call a female screener for the pat-down of the male perv? LOL |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9650224)
You wish, buddy! :p
LOL Mike |
Someone posted this on the TSA Blog:
"CBGB said... A comment I just realized was no where else in here. Does anybody else have a problem with having to stand with your hands in the air? As offensive as being treated like a criminal already is, I think I am more offended by having to stand in a tube with my hands in the air like a common criminal." Wear a T shirt with this version of the TSA motto: You don't have to BE a criminal to be treated like one.... |
Originally Posted by IslandBased
(Post 9652202)
Wear a T shirt with this version of the TSA motto:
You don't have to BE a criminal to be treated like one.... |
Originally Posted by dd992emo
(Post 9652397)
Superior slogan for the TSA! ^
It probably would get even more attention if printed in Arabic with the English translation underneath. :rolleyes::rolleyes: |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:30 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.