Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA PR piece in DEN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 8:45 am
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
TSA PR piece in DEN

Nothing really new here.

I find it amusing how the TSA tries to win the hearts and minds of travelers through words and not with effective security.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 8:54 am
  #2  
Cee
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 562
Ok. I checked out the article, blah blah blah...same old stuff. Now I am curious about the picture they used in the article. The picture looks like it is an outdoor checkpoint...is it? Which airport?
Cee is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 9:10 am
  #3  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by Cee
Ok. I checked out the article, blah blah blah...same old stuff. Now I am curious about the picture they used in the article. The picture looks like it is an outdoor checkpoint...is it? Which airport?
Looks like the DEN south checkpoint. To the backs of everyone in that pic is glass, the very south end wall of the DEN main terminal is all glass.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 9:10 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by Cee
Ok. I checked out the article, blah blah blah...same old stuff. Now I am curious about the picture they used in the article. The picture looks like it is an outdoor checkpoint...is it? Which airport?
It's DEN; the atrium checkpoint before you board the train.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 7:31 pm
  #5  
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: rural Indiana - IND
Programs: airline agnostic, Hilton Gold, IHG Plat, Jelly of the Month, DL defector, formerly NWA Plat (RIP)
Posts: 964
Originally Posted by LessO2
Nothing really new here.

I find it amusing how the TSA tries to win the hearts and minds of travelers through words and not with effective security.
Unfortunately, for the most part "journalists" seem more than willing to pander to the TSA/DHS and their nonsense rather than expose it for the sham that it is. Why is that?
LostInAmerica is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 8:13 pm
  #6  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by LostInAmerica
Unfortunately, for the most part "journalists" seem more than willing to pander to the TSA/DHS and their nonsense rather than expose it for the sham that it is. Why is that?
Read The Emperor's New Clothes
Spiff is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 7:58 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
Originally Posted by LostInAmerica
Unfortunately, for the most part "journalists" seem more than willing to pander to the TSA/DHS and their nonsense rather than expose it for the sham that it is. Why is that?
I think the explanation is that most journalists are proponents of big government and approve of TSA, perhaps the ultimate agency of the nanny state.
PatrickHenry1775 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 8:17 pm
  #8  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by PatrickHenry1775
most journalists are proponents of big government and approve of TSA
I agree with the second half of your statement but not the first. The media's support of the TSA and unwillingness to ask the tough questions when given the opportunity is an unfortunate reality. It is one of several reasons that I think a planned "No ID" day (as being discussed in this forum) will fail. In short, unless the media is willing to help push the agenda, making progress on it is painstakingly difficult.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 8:23 pm
  #9  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LAX/CWA/TOA/AUW
Programs: Mileage Plus, SW Rewards, WorldPerks, Barnes and Noble Frequent Buyers
Posts: 368
My girlfriend, her husband and her 2 kids (1 who has a serious medical problem requiring sterile tubing and patches) flew out from DEN last week, and some over zealous TSO tried to take their Oreos away because there was cream in them. She got a supervisor and he said you should have declared them because they were for the kids.

In the meantime her husband went through with 4 empty metal thermoses that never got checked.

Think of the children my foot. She will read up on medical supplies the next time she flies and have everything documented up the wazoo. She said LAS was better than DEN in her opinion.

airlinebrat 53
AirlineBrat53 is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 10:38 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 232
Originally Posted by AirlineBrat53
My girlfriend, her husband and her 2 kids (1 who has a serious medical problem requiring sterile tubing and patches) flew out from DEN last week, and some over zealous TSO tried to take their Oreos away because there was cream in them. She got a supervisor and he said you should have declared them because they were for the kids.
What? And why the hell would you have to declare them?


In the meantime her husband went through with 4 empty metal thermoses that never got checked.
Um......don't everyone bash me for this one.....but....maybe because they were empty is why they weren't checked. Four empty thermoses sure is a lot, especially since, they were empty. What were they for?

Think of the children my foot. She will read up on medical supplies the next time she flies and have everything documented up the wazoo. She said LAS was better than DEN in her opinion.

airlinebrat 53
.....you didn't mention her having any trouble with medical supplies. I'm confused.
Iworkhere is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 7:51 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by AirlineBrat53
TSO tried to take their Oreos away because there was cream in them. She got a supervisor and he said you should have declared them because they were for the kids.
There is NO WAY the "cream" in an Oreo cookie can be considered anything other than a solid. It is not a liquid. It is not a gel. Heck, it is barely food. I've had a snack pack of Oreos in the bottom of my briefcase for weeks (for emergency use only ) and it was never given a second glance.

I think the TSO was looking forward to snack-time later that afternoon
sbm12 is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 8:16 am
  #12  
Cee
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 562
Originally Posted by AirlineBrat53
... and some over zealous TSO tried to take their Oreos away because there was cream in them. She got a supervisor and he said you should have declared them because they were for the kids.
Wow...the common sense was definitly lacking. At least the supe decided the oreos were not a threat

I hope they don't make a new mandate directing us to take away oreos, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, tuna w/mayo, Twinkies....
Cee is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 8:18 am
  #13  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Originally Posted by Cee
I hope they don't make a new mandate directing us to take away Twinkies....
They'd need a toxic waste drum....
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.