Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flying without any security?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 8:44 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 966
Originally Posted by tsadude1
The good old days....We used to be able buy by these from the harware store http://www.nfatoys.com/tsmg/ but should we allow it once again?
Absolutely, the (present and longstanding) illegal interference in Constitutionally-protected free-market activity should cease.
erictank is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 9:23 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Olympia, WA
Programs: United MM Alaska MP Cessna/Piper Captain
Posts: 244
Originally Posted by erictank
Absolutely, the (present and longstanding) illegal interference in Constitutionally-protected free-market activity should cease.
I'll second that. What part of "shall not be infringed" don't these people understand?
Ghery is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 9:27 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: AA EXP, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,017
I think we should sell Tommy Guns in vending machines at the airport, like they do iPods.
oneant is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 9:29 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Olympia, WA
Programs: United MM Alaska MP Cessna/Piper Captain
Posts: 244
Originally Posted by oneant
Would someone planting a bomb on a plane and taking the lives of 150 people be considered an "infringement?"

Oh wait, that was his right, wasn't it?
There are responsibilities that go with the exercise of rights. You don't yell "FIRE!" in a crowded theater, but you have freedom of speech. Planting a bomb on a plane is not protected by the Constitution. Some folks have a real difficult time with this distinction.
Ghery is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 9:51 pm
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: Landry's President's Club, Amtrak Select,Marriott Silver, Taco Bell Fire, Awesomeness EXPLT
Posts: 23,986
Originally Posted by Cookie Jarvis
Mesa Air (until April 2007) with flights Watertown NY to Pittsburgh used the Beech 1900D. Big Sky Airlines took over and offers flights to Boston and Albany and they also use the Beech 1900D. In fact, I believe they bought their planes from Mesa!

Probably not many terrorists flying through Watertown NY these days!
I thought only flyertalkers wanted to fly to Watertown? On a more serious note while we have flaws in our security system suggesting to fly without security is just absurd. It would create an open invitation to every loon to attempt to create havoc on an aircraft.
Cheers
Howie
stockmanjr is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:00 pm
  #51  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by MapleLeaf
I have run into the same thing when flying on small craft going through the Canadian Arctic... no screening, cockpit door left open.

And before you say but there is nothing in the arctic, there are plenty of military establishments and NORAD bases/radar stations etc. Maybe the Inuit and Dene just aren't as paranoid as the rest of our continent.
Or as bloody stupid.
Spiff is online now  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:02 pm
  #52  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by stockmanjr
I thought only flyertalkers wanted to fly to Watertown? On a more serious note while we have flaws in our security system suggesting to fly without security is just absurd. It would create an open invitation to every loon to attempt to create havoc on an aircraft.
Cheers
Howie
I disagree completely. There are already plenty of holes in the asinine "security" that we are forced to endure at US airports. Anyone, anytime, can bring explosives past the checkpoint in their pants or in their butt. Why doesn't it happen? Because there just aren't that many terrorists out there as Comrade Hawley and Comrade Chertoff, the lowest of the low, would have you believe.
Spiff is online now  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:03 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: AA EXP, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,017
Originally Posted by Ghery
There are responsibilities that go with the exercise of rights. You don't yell "FIRE!" in a crowded theater, but you have freedom of speech. Planting a bomb on a plane is not protected by the Constitution. Some folks have a real difficult time with this distinction.
Is boarding an aircraft without security screening a constitutional right?
oneant is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:04 pm
  #54  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by oneant
Is boarding an aircraft without security screening a constitutional right?
No, but it's also an event that the government should have absolutely no say in.
Spiff is online now  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:06 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: AA EXP, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,017
Originally Posted by Spiff
I disagree completely. There are already plenty of holes in the asinine "security" that we are forced to endure at US airports. Anyone, anytime, can bring explosives past the checkpoint in their pants or in their butt. Why doesn't it happen? Because there just aren't that many terrorists out there as Comrade Hawley and Comrade Chertoff, the lowest of the low, would have you believe.
Let me see if I understand you correctly. You would be in favor of removing all security checkpoints for commercial air travel? No baggage screening, no metal detector, etc?
oneant is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:09 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: AA EXP, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,017
Originally Posted by Spiff
No, but it's also an event that the government should have absolutely no say in.
When security is done properly and effectively, the gov't doesn't have the last word. YOU would be the determining factor.

Personally, I would like to know that there's more than my own wishes and your mental state between a flight with and bomb and one without.
oneant is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:13 pm
  #57  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by oneant
Let me see if I understand you correctly. You would be in favor of removing all security checkpoints for commercial air travel? No baggage screening, no metal detector, etc?
I've never advocated that.

I would like to see the US government evicted from all US airports.

Airlines should be free to compete on whatever security they deem fit to provide and consumers should have a choice. I disagree with the hypothesis that no security would make all kinds of non-existent wackos come out of the woodwork. Our currrent US government-mandated idiocy already allows them to commit acts of terrorism at will.
Spiff is online now  
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 11:18 pm
  #58  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by oneant
When security is done properly and effectively, the gov't doesn't have the last word. YOU would be the determining factor.

Personally, I would like to know that there's more than my own wishes and your mental state between a flight with and bomb and one without.
Well, unfortunately that's not the case. We have some filthy Communists putting the armlock on airlines and passengers with disgusting sentiments like "Do you want to fly today?" and "Do you want to be a common carrier today?" Meanwhile, in addition to their disgusting attitude, their procedures and policies that none are permitted to compete on are completely ineffective. If you want C4 on your flight, put it in your pants or butt and walk past the "security" checkpoint. It will not be detected. Ever.
Spiff is online now  
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 1:03 am
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MUC/LAX/SMV
Programs: LH, UA, BD, AA, NW, FB, NH, AC, Sixt, Hertz, Avis, *W, HH, Marriott, PC, Leaders Club, AMEX
Posts: 12,406
Originally Posted by oneant
I think we should sell Tommy Guns in vending machines at the airport, like they do iPods.
They should be part of on-board duty free sales, and free items in international F (like NC headphones). Maybe even part of pre-departure service.

Last edited by flysurfer; Oct 1, 2007 at 1:09 am
flysurfer is offline  
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 1:06 am
  #60  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by Cholula
While not openly inviting pax to visit the cockpit, my last few flights on Aeromexico and a recent flight on Aerolineas Argentina operated the entire flight with the cockpit doors wide open.

Granted these are both "third-world" airlines but it was somewhat strange nevertheless.
As both Mexico and Argentina have per-capita GDP of over 10000 USD (on a PPP basis), and Mexico is even a member of the OECD, the elite club of the world's wealthiest countries, I'm not sure how anyone could categorise them as "third-world"
polonius is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.