![]() |
Originally Posted by LPCJr
I was not asked about any of these items. If the TSA was doing its supposed "job" (and I do use the term lightly), it seems to me that they should have inspected these items to ensure that they were in fact properly labeled with prescriptions (which they were). The fact that the TSA did not do this would seem to be an indication that they were unaware such items were in my luggage. This really helps to instill confidence that they would be able to find an explosive liquid or gel.
|
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
Could the baddies re-fill a prescription container with nasties?
|
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
Could the baddies re-fill a prescription container with nasties?
The whole liquids/gels "ban" is a big, stupid joke that was forced on the traveling public by two grossly incompetent individuals: Comrades Chertoff and Hawley. :td: |
I was thinkin' more aong the lines of a tube of Rx toothpaste, or jug of Rx mouthwash.
|
Originally Posted by Spiff
The whole liquids/gels "ban" is a big, stupid joke that was forced on the traveling public by two grossly incompetent individuals: Comrades Chertoff and Hawley. :td:
|
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
I was thinkin' more aong the lines of a tube of Rx toothpaste, or jug of Rx mouthwash.
|
Originally Posted by Points Scrounger
Or someone much higher up the chain, perhaps?
The buck stops with these two clowns. |
Originally Posted by GoingAway
I would respectfully disagree with the bolded statement above.
First a basic need is hydration – an airline is unable to pack enough water to truly keep all passengers on board hydrated. Many people suffer hydration issues and are unaware of it – I am not! I require and drink a LOT of water every day – it is SPRING water, not what is served on board most airlines. These new regs deny me the comfort of having a beverage I not only prefer but it’s the only type I drink as well as the “need” to address my hydration issues (I end up with diet 7-up or an alcoholic beverage as the only other things I drink from what is available). There are ample reports prior to this idiocy that STRONGLY RECOMMENDED people bring their own water on board to supplement what is provided by the airlines (in my case, for ex-USA trips I totally replace it). Those reports addressed the needs of the passengers to remain sufficiently hydrated and the comfort of ensuring that hydration is available when it was needed. Having the airlines pack a few extra liters hardly addresses this lack now does it, not to mention that the airlines serve those tiny cups of water and the FAs then disappear for the next hour or two – that is totally insufficient to address the needs of most passengers. |
Originally Posted by GoingAway
There are ample reports prior to this idiocy that STRONGLY RECOMMENDED people bring their own water on board to supplement what is provided by the airlines (in my case, for ex-USA trips I totally replace it). Those reports addressed the needs of the passengers to remain sufficiently hydrated and the comfort of ensuring that hydration is available when it was needed.
|
Originally Posted by studentff
Do you by chance have links to any of these reports? I'd love to cite them in my various rants/complaints to the airlines and government.
http://www.gliding-benalla.org/cross.../hydration.htm http://www.nutritionaustralia.org/Fo...ration_faq.asp |
Originally Posted by GoingAway
I would respectfully disagree with the bolded statement above.
First a basic need is hydration – an airline is unable to pack enough water to truly keep all passengers on board hydrated. Many people suffer hydration issues and are unaware of it – I am not! I require and drink a LOT of water every day – it is SPRING water, not what is served on board most airlines. These new regs deny me the comfort of having a beverage I not only prefer but it’s the only type I drink as well as the “need” to address my hydration issues (I end up with diet 7-up or an alcoholic beverage as the only other things I drink from what is available). There are ample reports prior to this idiocy that STRONGLY RECOMMENDED people bring their own water on board to supplement what is provided by the airlines (in my case, for ex-USA trips I totally replace it). Those reports addressed the needs of the passengers to remain sufficiently hydrated and the comfort of ensuring that hydration is available when it was needed. Having the airlines pack a few extra liters hardly addresses this lack now does it, not to mention that the airlines serve those tiny cups of water and the FAs then disappear for the next hour or two – that is totally insufficient to address the needs of most passengers. |
Originally Posted by justhere
Just curious, but if you dehydrate so easily, why are you drinking alcohol in an airplane?
BTW - my water addiction started many years ago when my stomach/body rebelled and I couldn't take any fruit juices b/c of the acidity and sugar or diet soda b/c of the carbonation, anything like coffee or with a lot of sugar gives me the shakes. It was water only for a while with a bit of alcohol here and there (well, I wasn't giving it all up). My body forced the conversion at the time, and I've kept it up ever since. |
Originally Posted by studentff
Sorry, wrong answer for anything medical related, especially that cannot be replaced.
I've had terrible luck with checked bags on some airlines (e.g. US). By "terrible" I mean 2 out of the last 3 times I have checked a bag it has taken more than two days after the flight arrived to get my bag. I get to ATL and check with the baggage desk. My bag is still in YQB. Delta will send it to my home. I got it today and found out why it was not on my plane. TSA had a note in the bag stating that they had to do extra screening on my baggage and apologized for any inconvenience. I was ready to blame Delta for losing my bag, but TSA was responsible the whole time. TSA is nothing more than a bunch of bumbling morons enforcing draconian rules for the appeasement of leisure travelers who wouldn't know safety and security if it bit them in the behind. If Osama wanted to show how foolish, ineffective, and stupid US policies are, he would do no better than to point to Chertoff's antics in banning toothpaste and Neosporyn. I always fly to my customer sites, but I am going to start driving and taking the train where possible. If the airlines start losing customers (i.e., money), they might stand up to these poof balls. - Alan :mad: :mad: :mad: |
Originally Posted by studentff
Do you by chance have links to any of these reports? I'd love to cite them in my various rants/complaints to the airlines and government.
TSA won't respond to my complaints (not even a canned reply). One of my Congress critters can't figure out why I don't want to give up my toothpaste for safety (which is why I am actively supporting his opponent now). The two senators don't have a clue what the fuss is all about. - Alan :mad: |
Deleted
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:17 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.