questioned by a fam
Dec 12, 2005 | 10:04 am
#211
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by 24th ID
That is cool. When you don't agree with someone or a group of people just start calling them names. I always makes it better. 
In case you're wondering...."activist judges."
Dec 12, 2005 | 10:30 am
#212
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,263
Originally Posted by 24th ID
That is cool. When you don't agree with someone or a group of people just start calling them names. I always makes it better.
I am personally disgusted at the road both liberal activist and right-wing extremist judges have taken since Bush I, and through the Clinton years. It started with the 'war on drugs' and has continued with the 'war on terror'.
There is no excuse for setting aside the most basic principles of this country, including the protection of citizens from government, while pandering to fear and politics.
If a federal judge who follows the 'party line' wants to appear on FT and debate the issues, I am happy to do so and will promise to refrain from name calling
Dec 12, 2005 | 11:16 am
#213
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 275
Originally Posted by bocastephen
I would say calling people idiots who desecrate the Constitution while pandering to the demands of weak minded politicians and power hungry law enforcement agencies, is letting them off easy.
I am personally disgusted at the road both liberal activist and right-wing extremist judges have taken since Bush I, and through the Clinton years. It started with the 'war on drugs' and has continued with the 'war on terror'.
There is no excuse for setting aside the most basic principles of this country, including the protection of citizens from government, while pandering to fear and politics.
If a federal judge who follows the 'party line' wants to appear on FT and debate the issues, I am happy to do so and will promise to refrain from name calling
I am personally disgusted at the road both liberal activist and right-wing extremist judges have taken since Bush I, and through the Clinton years. It started with the 'war on drugs' and has continued with the 'war on terror'.
There is no excuse for setting aside the most basic principles of this country, including the protection of citizens from government, while pandering to fear and politics.
If a federal judge who follows the 'party line' wants to appear on FT and debate the issues, I am happy to do so and will promise to refrain from name calling
That would be an interesting debate.
Dec 12, 2005 | 5:52 pm
#216
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: He who dies with the most miles wins!!
Programs: WorldPerks Demoted again to SE, DL 3.1MM Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 11,678
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Glad to see the change of heart. So you are saying you now like it when I'm correct (as usual)? ROTFLOL
ROTFLOL Don't push your luck
Dec 12, 2005 | 6:07 pm
#218
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
Programs: DL: 3.8 MM, Marriott: Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 24,575
Folks, Ive had to go through this thread and edit out a bunch of posts due to off-topic and inappropriate comments about moderation.
Please stay on topic here.
Thanks.
___________________________
Cholula
Travel Safety/Security Forum Moderator
Please stay on topic here.
Thanks.
___________________________
Cholula
Travel Safety/Security Forum Moderator