Why the need to list all countries visited when renewing Global Entry??
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
Why the need to list all countries visited when renewing Global Entry??
We filled out the renewal for Mrs. Milepig yesterday. It about killed us. Government inefficiency at its worst. Why do we need to list the many countries we’ve visited in the past 5 years? They know. Throw up a list and ask “Is this correct?” We were looking at pictures on our phone and am sure we missed a couple. We changed planes in Warsaw, does that count? Then we timed out and had to start over. Then at the end you need to confirm each page, 9 of them, one by one. Totally painful and unnecessary. They should just call up the records and ask whether it’s all correct. One click and we’d be done. Government red tape at it’s worst.
#2
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,653
Moderator's Note
Hello @milepig,
Since your question is more about governmental policy than requesting practical information about the Global Entry renewal process, I moved your post to the Policy Debate forum.
To discuss what's considered a visited country, please refer to the following thread:
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator
Since your question is more about governmental policy than requesting practical information about the Global Entry renewal process, I moved your post to the Policy Debate forum.
To discuss what's considered a visited country, please refer to the following thread:
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
They don't. Seriously. Multiple nationalities (i.e. different passports) and multiple reservations (i.e. separate tickets) makes CBP difficult to keep track.
More is better than less.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
1. This question is on standard government security clearance forms as well. Has been pretty much forever.
2. While CBP (and other agencies) sort of know where one has been, these records are far from accurate. Besides, many of the answers are known, but this is a chance to see whether one tells the truth.
3. Don't play cute. Answer the question truthfully. If one changed aircraft at WAW, list Poland. If the follow up question is, "what did you do in Poland?" the answer is, "we changed planes."
The biggests risks in this process, presuming that one is not a convicted felon or currently a fugitive, are people who overthink and wind up making false statements.
2. While CBP (and other agencies) sort of know where one has been, these records are far from accurate. Besides, many of the answers are known, but this is a chance to see whether one tells the truth.
3. Don't play cute. Answer the question truthfully. If one changed aircraft at WAW, list Poland. If the follow up question is, "what did you do in Poland?" the answer is, "we changed planes."
The biggests risks in this process, presuming that one is not a convicted felon or currently a fugitive, are people who overthink and wind up making false statements.
#6
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Continental OnePass
Posts: 856
Since this was a GE renewal, you must've know the question was coming, since it was on your original GE application. It might've been prudent to keep a list as you travelled (I have a word document for this purpose).
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
but I thought all this stuff was in one big global system now.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,129
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
It's far from the only question where a government agency may have a record but it is asked anyway. E.g., criminal record.
It's designed to catch those who make false statements and therefore should not be trusted in this "trusted traveler program."
It's designed to catch those who make false statements and therefore should not be trusted in this "trusted traveler program."
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,129
Then the true purpose is an integrity check. Just own it.
#11
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,548
They do not know the complete list.
Think about it as others have noted. Passport scans are not required to enter many countries, and many people (such as myself) have multiple passports (I have four, from two different countries and not all are linked) and the government is too inefficient to track them all and the data. And some countries do not stamp US passports regularly upon entry or exit whereas others do electronic scans in system that get shared and verified. PNRs, for the most part, do not list non aviation travel, and POV or other travel is not always linked via the same type of systems air travel uses which get back to CBP.
As I discussed in other threads years ago CBP paid me and others as contractors a few years ago where I got to watch them in action (open source stuff); so from that alone I say trust me, they are as inefficient as they come. Seeing it both from the inside and outside as a user it can be mind boggling. That said it has gotten better over the last 10-12 years. The new GE biometric match is an improvement IMO, for example. As an early, early beta test user of GE since it was just at three US airports, I have seen many changes and not all bring more efficiency, but overall it is still one of the better government programs.
That all said, as others note, defer to caution and list everything even changing planes. Changing planes in IST flags people all the time, for example, so if you do not list Turkey you could be SOL. And yes, as a TRUSTED traveller program, integrity checks are part of the system. Last thing I am is a CBP apologist or cheerleader, but the onus is on the traveller for the forms, and to not make goofy or off-colour comments to the officer in the GE line or what not and complain about the system. There is always MPC or whatnot if one does not want to the more onerous (and not-free) GE checks.
Think about it as others have noted. Passport scans are not required to enter many countries, and many people (such as myself) have multiple passports (I have four, from two different countries and not all are linked) and the government is too inefficient to track them all and the data. And some countries do not stamp US passports regularly upon entry or exit whereas others do electronic scans in system that get shared and verified. PNRs, for the most part, do not list non aviation travel, and POV or other travel is not always linked via the same type of systems air travel uses which get back to CBP.
As I discussed in other threads years ago CBP paid me and others as contractors a few years ago where I got to watch them in action (open source stuff); so from that alone I say trust me, they are as inefficient as they come. Seeing it both from the inside and outside as a user it can be mind boggling. That said it has gotten better over the last 10-12 years. The new GE biometric match is an improvement IMO, for example. As an early, early beta test user of GE since it was just at three US airports, I have seen many changes and not all bring more efficiency, but overall it is still one of the better government programs.
That all said, as others note, defer to caution and list everything even changing planes. Changing planes in IST flags people all the time, for example, so if you do not list Turkey you could be SOL. And yes, as a TRUSTED traveller program, integrity checks are part of the system. Last thing I am is a CBP apologist or cheerleader, but the onus is on the traveller for the forms, and to not make goofy or off-colour comments to the officer in the GE line or what not and complain about the system. There is always MPC or whatnot if one does not want to the more onerous (and not-free) GE checks.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
It should be perfectly clear to you by now that CBP does not necessarily have a complete list.
What you do not know as an applicant is whether there is anything missing and if there is, what is missing.
Telling the truth is not difficult or burdensome.
What you do not know as an applicant is whether there is anything missing and if there is, what is missing.
Telling the truth is not difficult or burdensome.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,203
I realised that when I completed my GE application last year that I forgot to state that I had visited both France and Belgium in the previous 5 years
In my mind I hadn't visited either because in the case of france I merely passed through on the train and in Belgium I changed trains to / from Amsterdam (and I had included Netherlands because I had visited it)
So I went prepared to be asked at the interview to give the expanation and a fulsom apology but it wasn't raised
I now keep a list at the back of my diary of all the countries I've physically stepped foot in just so I can complete the list accuratly when I renew even if to most peoples definitions of 'visited' I havn't actually visited other than move from one part of an airport!
But evenif theformtimes out I thought it still saved what you entered or do you need to activly save it yourself (which is good practice anyway)
In my mind I hadn't visited either because in the case of france I merely passed through on the train and in Belgium I changed trains to / from Amsterdam (and I had included Netherlands because I had visited it)
So I went prepared to be asked at the interview to give the expanation and a fulsom apology but it wasn't raised
I now keep a list at the back of my diary of all the countries I've physically stepped foot in just so I can complete the list accuratly when I renew even if to most peoples definitions of 'visited' I havn't actually visited other than move from one part of an airport!
But evenif theformtimes out I thought it still saved what you entered or do you need to activly save it yourself (which is good practice anyway)
Last edited by UKtravelbear; Sep 24, 2019 at 11:36 am
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,901
I realised that when I completed my GE application last year that I forgot to state that I had visited both France and Belgium in the previous 5 years
In my mind I hadn't visited either because in the case of france I merely passed through on the train and in Belgium I changed trains to / from Amsterdam (and I had included Netherlands because I had visited it)
So I went prepared to be asked at the interview to give the expanation and a fulsom apology but it wasn't raised
I now keep a list at the back of my diary of all the countries I've physically stepped foot in just so I can complete the list accuratly when I renew even if to most peoples definitions of 'visited' I havn't actually visited other than move from one part of an airport!
But evenif theformtimes out I thought it still saved what you entered or do you need to activly save it yourself (which is good practice anyway)
In my mind I hadn't visited either because in the case of france I merely passed through on the train and in Belgium I changed trains to / from Amsterdam (and I had included Netherlands because I had visited it)
So I went prepared to be asked at the interview to give the expanation and a fulsom apology but it wasn't raised
I now keep a list at the back of my diary of all the countries I've physically stepped foot in just so I can complete the list accuratly when I renew even if to most peoples definitions of 'visited' I havn't actually visited other than move from one part of an airport!
But evenif theformtimes out I thought it still saved what you entered or do you need to activly save it yourself (which is good practice anyway)
I also now wonder if there's any reason to not replace every single Schengen country with a single "Schengen Countries" box. You can move free among them and as far as I no none of them would flag questions by CBP as a questionable country. It would certainly save a lot of time.
On my first application I actually forgot Canada, and during the interview they did ask "you've not been to Canada?" while looking pointedly at their screen. I almost said "oh, I don't really think of Canada as a foreign country" but caught myself and just said "I guess I forgot that one." and the agent just let it go and approved me.
To close the loop - in the end Mrs. Milepig received her "approval with no interview required" email about 4 days after applying, so we must not have been too far off.
#15
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 464
On my first application I actually forgot Canada, and during the interview they did ask "you've not been to Canada?" while looking pointedly at their screen. I almost said "oh, I don't really think of Canada as a foreign country" but caught myself and just said "I guess I forgot that one." and the agent just let it go and approved me.
That's not a foul as the application explicitly states to not include Canada and Mexico in your visited list.
My GE renewal interview was all of two questions. "Have you been to Canada?" "Nope." "Have you been to Mexico?" "Yup." And then the updated picture and fingerprints.