Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Airports and Hurricanes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2017, 7:58 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Airports and Hurricanes

Originally Posted by sbrower
Of if they did NONE of those things and moved the exact same number as they move every single Friday afternoon. (I am not saying that is the case - I am simply pointing out that the statistics are totally unclear - and, unlike Superbowl, I see no evidence that the airlines had any more capacity than any other weekday afternoon - this wasn't like a hurricane warning where people might have flooded the airport in larger numbers because they were willing to sleep on the floor for 2 days - these were people with reservations for regular flights).
Speaking of airports and hurricanes, there were two reports that TSA at Hobby would not allow people stranded at the closed airport into the "sterile" area to get food and drinks. I don't know Hobby, is there no access to food landside there?
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2017, 9:10 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by petaluma1
Speaking of airports and hurricanes, there were two reports that TSA at Hobby would not allow people stranded at the closed airport into the "sterile" area to get food and drinks. I don't know Hobby, is there no access to food landside there?
I don't doubt that statement but it would take something like TSA to refuse people health and comfort access during an emergency.

Proof of no adult leadership at TSA.
STBCypriot likes this.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2017, 10:48 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, SkyMiles
Posts: 4,159
Here's a couple possibilities:

a) Maybe leadership was worried that someone would take advantage of the situation and plant something in the sterile area?
b) Maybe the sterile area was flooded or had damage inside? Or all the restaurants were closed, anyway.

With that said, the TSO's could have came up with a few possible solutions:

a) Offer to bring food/drinks to customers from inside security.
b) Ask the people inside if they would be willing to bring out food/drinks, or even sell them.
c) Implement patdowns for everyone going past security (if the machines weren't working) or just suspend ID requirements (after all, if people are cleared during screening, they're safe).

A little thinking outside the box would have helped the situation. Really not defending TSA here, but maybe they had their own reasons, too?
MrAndy1369 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2017, 11:05 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by MrAndy1369
Here's a couple possibilities:

a) Maybe leadership was worried that someone would take advantage of the situation and plant something in the sterile area?
b) Maybe the sterile area was flooded or had damage inside? Or all the restaurants were closed, anyway.

With that said, the TSO's could have came up with a few possible solutions:

a) Offer to bring food/drinks to customers from inside security.
b) Ask the people inside if they would be willing to bring out food/drinks, or even sell them.
c) Implement patdowns for everyone going past security (if the machines weren't working) or just suspend ID requirements (after all, if people are cleared during screening, they're safe).

A little thinking outside the box would have helped the situation. Really not defending TSA here, but maybe they had their own reasons, too?
Of course TSA has "reasons".

Sometimes rules have to be modified on the fly during an unexpected situation. Professionals would understand that concept and would have made allowances. TSA? NO!
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2017, 12:00 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, SkyMiles
Posts: 4,159
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
Of course TSA has "reasons".

Sometimes rules have to be modified on the fly during an unexpected situation. Professionals would understand that concept and would have made allowances. TSA? NO!
True. It's just that we don't have enough context. Were the machines malfunctioning because of the floods? Was the sterile side of the airport even open? Maybe the TSA screeners had to deny people anyway because airside was flooded? Only allowing ticketed passengers inside (which is SOP anyway)? If so, the OP could have bought a refundable ticket to go past security, then cancelled. Theoretically, TSA could have suspended same-day travel requirements to let people inside, or offered to bring water outside. Couldn't the OP have asked a TA for a gate pass or asked an airport employee if they could do something about bringing out water/food to stranded landside passengers?

We need more context and information. What exactly did the TSA screeners say? "Sorry, no water or food for you, they're all inside the sterile area and you don't have access!" Would they really let people suffer like that? I find that hard to believe... it's human nature to want to help.
MrAndy1369 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2017, 12:13 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Originally Posted by MrAndy1369
True. It's just that we don't have enough context. Were the machines malfunctioning because of the floods? Was the sterile side of the airport even open? Maybe the TSA screeners had to deny people anyway because airside was flooded? Only allowing ticketed passengers inside (which is SOP anyway)? If so, the OP could have bought a refundable ticket to go past security, then cancelled. Theoretically, TSA could have suspended same-day travel requirements to let people inside, or offered to bring water outside. Couldn't the OP have asked a TA for a gate pass or asked an airport employee if they could do something about bringing out water/food to stranded landside passengers?

We need more context and information. What exactly did the TSA screeners say? "Sorry, no water or food for you, they're all inside the sterile area and you don't have access!" Would they really let people suffer like that? I find that hard to believe... it's human nature to want to help.
You have much more faith in TSA than I do.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2017, 5:38 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,634
From the Houston Business Journal:
Houston airports remain closed until further notice, most stranded passengers moved

Excerpt:
More than 100 passengers were still stranded at the two airports combined as of Aug. 28, [Houston Airport System spokesman Bill] Begley said. Many of those who remained stuck at Hobby, for instance, were from Houston, and it was safer to stay at the airport than to get back on the roads, he added.

“We’re finding inventive ways of taking care of passengers and staff,” Begley said, calling the efforts “a testimony to cooperation and solid partnerships.”
TWA884 is offline  
Old Aug 31, 2017, 8:22 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,111
Apparently some FAM's based out of Houston aren't to happy with how their TSA superiors treated them.
Federal Air Marshals Say TSA Separated Them From Families During Harvey


https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-a...223317968.html


Twenty-six federal air marshals based in Houston were not allowed to return to their families after Hurricane Harvey hit late last week, according to an association that represents the law enforcement agents.
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.