Mass Transit Whole Body Scanners
#31
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
As far as I can tell, hardly anybody rides it anyway.
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,121
#33
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,647
As far as I can tell, hardly anybody rides it anyway.
#34
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
“We’re looking for explosive vests, we’re looking for assault rifles. We’re not necessarily looking for smaller weapons that don’t have the ability to inflict mass casualties.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/u...-scanners.html
#35
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
"The screening process is voluntary, Wiggins said, but customers who choose not to be screened won't be able to ride on the subway."
#37
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 471
I think the other loop hole they use is the ticket purchase. All commercial airline tickets in the US have a security waiver that states that you agree to being screened. I don't think that trick is going to fly on mass-transit.Then again, it hasn't stopped them before.
Last edited by VelvetJones; Aug 19, 2018 at 9:12 pm
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,598
I think they other loop hole they use is the ticket purchase. All commercial airline tickets in the US have a security waiver that states that you agree to being screened. I don't think that trick is going to fly on mass-transit.Then again, it hasn't stopped them before.
#40
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 471
Taking it another step further... What makes a subway so special? Is it the bottleneck of the toll styles that makes it easy to implement this sort of BS? A city bus would be just as easy and deadly target, yet no one has attacked one and any of this security theater for buses would be laughable at best. Ask yourself who benefits from this sort of nonsense. You'll find your answer very quickly.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,121
Taking it another step further... What makes a subway so special? Is it the bottleneck of the toll styles that makes it easy to implement this sort of BS? A city bus would be just as easy and deadly target, yet no one has attacked one and any of this security theater for buses would be laughable at best. Ask yourself who benefits from this sort of nonsense. You'll find your answer very quickly.
Would be interested in the senior executives of the company making these devices and whose hands in government are being greased.
#42
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Taking it another step further... What makes a subway so special? Is it the bottleneck of the toll styles that makes it easy to implement this sort of BS? A city bus would be just as easy and deadly target, yet no one has attacked one and any of this security theater for buses would be laughable at best. Ask yourself who benefits from this sort of nonsense. You'll find your answer very quickly.
It's inevitable. It will happen eventually. The nutjobs have realized the deadly nature of cars and trucks and started using them for vehicular attacks in recent years. It's only a matter of time before a major vehicle attack occurs in the US, whether with a hijacked bus or a rented/stolen/borrowed truck. And the resulting public outrage will give TSA carte blanche in all transportation modes, not just aviation.
#43
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,613
It's inevitable. It will happen eventually. The nutjobs have realized the deadly nature of cars and trucks and started using them for vehicular attacks in recent years. It's only a matter of time before a major vehicle attack occurs in the US, whether with a hijacked bus or a rented/stolen/borrowed truck. And the resulting public outrage will give TSA carte blanche in all transportation modes, not just aviation.
#44
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
That was a bomb, located inside a truck. The WTC bomb in 1993 was also in a truck. As was the bomb that took out the US Marine barracks in Beirut in, I think it was 1983.
A vehicle-based bomb isn't exactly the same as a vehicle attack. In a vehicle bomb attack, the vehicle is merely a delivery mechanism for the weapon, but in a vehicle attack, the vehicle itself is the weapon, running people down like a lawnmower. It's these attacks which are on the rise, and it's inevitable that one will take place using a hijacked municipal or school bus, or a stolen charter bus, or a stolen piece of construction equipment like a garbage or dump truck. Any of which would then cause another wave of panic through the US as people scream for tighter security on buses and trucks and other equipment.
I fear the extra costs that such panic would impose on businesses across the country after such an attack. Almost as much as the attack itself.
A vehicle-based bomb isn't exactly the same as a vehicle attack. In a vehicle bomb attack, the vehicle is merely a delivery mechanism for the weapon, but in a vehicle attack, the vehicle itself is the weapon, running people down like a lawnmower. It's these attacks which are on the rise, and it's inevitable that one will take place using a hijacked municipal or school bus, or a stolen charter bus, or a stolen piece of construction equipment like a garbage or dump truck. Any of which would then cause another wave of panic through the US as people scream for tighter security on buses and trucks and other equipment.
I fear the extra costs that such panic would impose on businesses across the country after such an attack. Almost as much as the attack itself.
#45
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 962
"Almost"? Surely the costs of post-9/11 stuff has cost orders of magnitude more than the damage itself, let alone if you include the subsequent wars.