FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   Automatic TSA Pre Check Assessments (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1771245-automatic-tsa-pre-check-assessments.html)

Boggie Dog Jun 9, 2016 9:04 am

Automatic TSA Pre Check Assessments
 
In the discussion of long TSA Security Lines I find it interesting that TSA claims "Managed Inclusion" has ended but are using Canines to move people to expedited screening. Also note how TSA is pushing hard for people to pony up their $85 per head to sign up for Pre Check.

Apparently Pre Check Expedited Screening is TSA's answer to long security lines, not modifying wasteful time consuming procedures and processes that offer little security benefit.

I was unaware of the Automatic TSA Pre Check Assessments but have personally benefited from this selection method several times. It is this method that I believe TSA should use for the majority of Expedited Screening assignments. I also think that there is sufficient information available to TSA that a persons Risk Level can be determined when a ticket is purchased.


http://www.gao.gov/assets/680/677714.pdf


TSA uses the following methods to assess whether a passenger is low
risk and therefore eligible for expedited screening.

• Approved TSA Pre ® lists of known travelers—These lists are
comprised of individuals whom TSA has determined to be low risk by
virtue of their membership in a specific group, such as active duty
military members, or based on group vetting requirements, or if
approved through the TSA Pre® Application Program.

Automated TSA Pre ® risk assessments of all passengers—
Using these assessments, TSA assigns passengers scores based
upon information available to TSA to identify low risk passengers
eligible for expedited screening for a specific flight prior to the
passengers’ arrival at the airport.


• Real-time threat assessments through Managed Inclusion—
These assessments use several layers of security, including
procedures that randomly select passengers for expedited screening,
behavior detection officers who observe passengers to identify highrisk
behaviors, and passenger screening canine teams to help ensure
that passengers selected for expedited screening have not handled
explosive material. TSA developed Managed Inclusion as a tool to
improve the efficiency of dedicated TSA Pre ® screening lanes.

petaluma1 Jun 9, 2016 9:44 am

However, we have yet to hear of anyone being moved to "expedited screening" after being sniffed.

nachtnebel Jun 10, 2016 7:09 pm

Flew out of SEA this afternoon, got pre on my boarding pass. I have not signed up for it. Glad to get it because the lines were long everywhere else. They did have poochies sniffing pre and non pre alike though.

Boggie Dog Jun 10, 2016 7:21 pm


Originally Posted by nachtnebel (Post 26760925)
Flew out of SEA this afternoon, got pre on my boarding pass. I have not signed up for it. Glad to get it because the lines were long everywhere else. They did have poochies sniffing pre and non pre alike though.

Were the dogs being used in a manner that expedited the screening process for those people sniffed?

nachtnebel Jun 10, 2016 8:30 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26760961)
Were the dogs being used in a manner that expedited the screening process for those people sniffed?

Not that I could tell. They were in a roped off area inside the checkpoint entrance. Oh, and they did have a noisy fat troll literally shrieking at everyone to keep moving and don't pet the pooch. Extremely offensive. Go get the Brits to teach you how to do this politely.

chollie Jun 10, 2016 8:41 pm


Originally Posted by nachtnebel (Post 26761132)
Not that I could tell. They were in a roped off area inside the checkpoint entrance. Oh, and they did have a noisy fat troll literally shrieking at everyone to keep moving and don't pet the pooch. Extremely offensive. Go get the Brits to teach you how to do this politely.


I feel for that poor dog's ears.

snabbu Jun 10, 2016 8:50 pm


Originally Posted by nachtnebel (Post 26761132)
Not that I could tell. They were in a roped off area inside the checkpoint entrance. Oh, and they did have a noisy fat troll literally shrieking at everyone to keep moving and don't pet the pooch. Extremely offensive. Go get the Brits to teach you how to do this politely.

+1.

GUWonder Jun 11, 2016 7:18 am


Originally Posted by nachtnebel (Post 26761132)
Not that I could tell. They were in a roped off area inside the checkpoint entrance. Oh, and they did have a noisy fat troll literally shrieking at everyone to keep moving and don't pet the pooch. Extremely offensive. Go get the Brits to teach you how to do this politely.

At LHR, the screeners bark much like the TSA. The days of the UK being a good example of how to treat passengers at screening checkpoints are sort of gone if using the most famous British airport as an example.

petaluma1 Jun 11, 2016 1:41 pm

On AskTSA, there is a tweet from a woman wondering why her 13 yr. old daughter got PreCheck and she didn't. She, of course, got a non-answer from TSA, alluding to pre-flight assessment.

Which makes me ask: what kind of a background check can be done on a 13 year old child in the first place? If the child committed some kind of a crime, there would be no record of it as juvenile records are normally sealed.

Boggie Dog Jun 11, 2016 4:35 pm


Originally Posted by petaluma1 (Post 26763764)
On AskTSA, there is a tweet from a woman wondering why her 13 yr. old daughter got PreCheck and she didn't. She, of course, got a non-answer from TSA, alluding to pre-flight assessment.

Which makes me ask: what kind of a background check can be done on a 13 year old child in the first place? If the child committed some kind of a crime, there would be no record of it as juvenile records are normally sealed.

A child can accompany a parent who has Pre, shouldn't the reverse be true?

televisor Jun 12, 2016 10:56 am


Originally Posted by GUWonder (Post 26762394)
At LHR, the screeners bark much like the TSA. The days of the UK being a good example of how to treat passengers at screening checkpoints are sort of gone if using the most famous British airport as an example.

This varies IME. I had a polite yet firm screener at T2 recently, despite my being somewhat jetlagged-grumpy about confiscation of an unopened mini-wine-bottle from my previous flight (the UK is the only place that forces everyone into transfer security, I was coming from Canada on this occasion).

I do have much worse memories of T5 consistently being bad, more so in transfer security. The budget airports (stansted, luton and the like) are also quite noisy and grumpy.

I do find ZRH rather polite (it's done by the local police, who also conduct border processing). They will calmly double-check that you've removed your laptop, and will give you an assessment of shoes/belts if requested (I've flown in hiking boots before, plus my belt has issues in the WTMD). They'll even explain that you can take your swiss-army knife through, but that you should probably check it when returning since other countries might not permit it in carry-ons.

SNA_Flyer Jun 13, 2016 4:32 pm

Myself (have GE) and friend (nothing - not even FF status) traveling on same PNR. He received PreCheck on both the outbound and return with me.

So managed inclusion is still alive.

Boggie Dog Jun 13, 2016 4:48 pm


Originally Posted by SNA_Flyer (Post 26773835)
Myself (have GE) and friend (nothing - not even FF status) traveling on same PNR. He received PreCheck on both the outbound and return with me.

So managed inclusion is still alive.

If Pre was printed on the ticket that is Automated Pre Check Risk Assessment not Managed Inclusion.

petaluma1 Jun 13, 2016 6:15 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26773900)
If Pre was printed on the ticket that is Automated Pre Check Risk Assessment not Managed Inclusion.

It might not be Managed Inclusion according to the world of the TSA but it is managed inclusion nonetheless. TSA is just going about it in a different way to satisfy their critics.

Boggie Dog Jun 13, 2016 6:58 pm


Originally Posted by petaluma1 (Post 26774207)
It might not be Managed Inclusion according to the world of the TSA but it is managed inclusion nonetheless. TSA is just going about it in a different way to satisfy their critics.

If we use TSA's tortured definitions it's not Managed Inclusion. The destinction is only important when trying to figure out what flavor of TSA security is in play today.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:43 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.