FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   Automatic TSA Pre Check Assessments (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1771245-automatic-tsa-pre-check-assessments.html)

televisor Jun 15, 2016 10:29 am


Originally Posted by petaluma1 (Post 26782438)
I have read of exactly one instance of where pax were allowed to keep their shoes on during screening because of the dogs. If you know of others, please enlighten us. All other reports indicate there was no change in screening.

Twice last year: got the full pre-treatment (without Pre) where they were using dogs. I've not been past dogs on any other occasion (I now have pre via GE so I don't use normal lines anymore).

petaluma1 Jun 15, 2016 10:29 am


Originally Posted by gingersnaps (Post 26782540)
It would seem, based on TSA statements, that expedited screening is a process. My anecdotes of people claiming expedited screening at one airport, even though they did not have Precheck, supports the notion that expedited screening is process that can occur at on any lane screening lane. It also supports the notion that the expedited process can occur unbeknownst to the recipient - that is, there isn't a big blue TSA PRE sign marking the way to the dedicated Precheck lane.

:confused:

petaluma1 Jun 15, 2016 10:30 am


Originally Posted by televisor (Post 26782587)
Twice last year: got the full pre-treatment (without Pre) where they were using dogs. I've not been past dogs on any other occasion (I now have pre via GE so I don't use normal lines anymore).

Good gosh, where were you a couple of weeks ago when this question was being asked in another thread? :)

chollie Jun 15, 2016 10:35 am


Originally Posted by gingersnaps (Post 26782540)
It would seem, based on TSA statements, that expedited screening is a process. My anecdotes of people claiming expedited screening at one airport, even though they did not have Precheck, supports the notion that expedited screening is process that can occur at on any lane screening lane. It also supports the notion that the expedited process can occur unbeknownst to the recipient - that is, there isn't a big blue TSA PRE sign marking the way to the dedicated Precheck lane.

The only expedited processing I think anyone is really concerned about is the folks who paid $85 for a dedicated lane and no disrobing/unpacking except for the rare secondary or alarm resolution.

You know, you pay for a service and the service is provided - like GE.

Instead, 'expedited processing' can mean you pay $85, wait 45 minutes in line, and then (maybe) get to keep your shoes on.


No one
is paying $85 and submitting to a background check, fingerprinting and an interview for the opportunity to wait in the regular line and 'maybe' get to keep their shoes on.

gingersnaps Jun 15, 2016 10:49 am


Originally Posted by petaluma1 (Post 26782589)
:confused:

Sorry, I do not know how to explain it better.

televisor (sp) indicated to getting Pre associated with TSA dogs. You posted a tweet about Precheck treatment associated with TSA dogs. All 3 instances do not mention being "moved" to a specific lane.

chollie Jun 15, 2016 11:13 am

If I am in a regular lane and someone offers me a card so I get the 'Pre' experience, that is not 'expedited screening'.

That is a 'bait-and-switch'. Pre advertises dedicated lanes, no disrobing or unpacking except for rare secondaries. Sounds a lot like GE, right?

This business of trying to intermix Pre and regular pax in one long line is a recipe for confusion and disaster - and it cheats the paid Pre customers. My experience is not 'expedited' if the people in front of me are not Pre and are busy disrobing and unpacking.

It doesn't help that there are regular, if infrequent, reports of airports forcing an entire Pre lane to unpack LGAs and laptops. People signed up for infrequent secondaries, not entire lanes arbitrarily converted to a regular experience for everyone, 'just because'.

petaluma1 Jun 15, 2016 11:18 am


Originally Posted by gingersnaps (Post 26782707)
Sorry, I do not know how to explain it better.

televisor (sp) indicated to getting Pre associated with TSA dogs. You posted a tweet about Precheck treatment associated with TSA dogs. All 3 instances do not mention being "moved" to a specific lane.

Really, who cares? You are nit picking still.

gingersnaps Jun 15, 2016 11:47 am


Originally Posted by petaluma1 (Post 26782861)
Really, who cares? You are nit picking still.

If TSA dogs sniffing regular queue results in SOME, but not all, keeping their shoes on and laptops in - ergo expedited screening, wouldnt that suggest the dogs are
associated with offering expedited screening processes in regular lanes?

Would it not also suggest that dogs are not just a PR stunt but have some relation to security via Managed Inclusion aka Real Time Threat Assessment And suggest hat the dog jobs are NOT A favor handed out to ensure a higher paycheck for a favored employee?

Boggie Dog Jun 15, 2016 11:48 am


Originally Posted by chollie (Post 26782830)
If I am in a regular lane and someone offers me a card so I get the 'Pre' experience, that is not 'expedited screening'.

That is a 'bait-and-switch'. Pre advertises dedicated lanes, no disrobing or unpacking except for rare secondaries. Sounds a lot like GE, right?

This business of trying to intermix Pre and regular pax in one long line is a recipe for confusion and disaster - and it cheats the paid Pre customers. My experience is not 'expedited' if the people in front of me are not Pre and are busy disrobing and unpacking.

It doesn't help that there are regular, if infrequent, reports of airports forcing an entire Pre lane to unpack LGAs and laptops. People signed up for infrequent secondaries, not entire lanes arbitrarily converted to a regular experience for everyone, 'just because'.

I think what you are talking about is what is sometimes called Pre-Light.

Example, a person who has paid for Pre-Check finds the regular Pre-Check lane closed and is given a card to use in the regular lane. What happens then is all over the board, they may get to keep shoes on or not, laptop may come out or not, and so forth. It certainly is not what the traveler signed up for and is not Pre-Check.

TSA has failed to properly staff Pre-Check lanes after selling an expedited screening product. In any other business there would be legal consequences for such a business practice.

What TSA should be doing is screening everyone using Pre-Check type standards and escalating screening for alarms. Everyone benefits, travelers and TSA staff.

chollie Jun 15, 2016 12:11 pm


Originally Posted by gingersnaps (Post 26783044)
If TSA dogs sniffing regular queue results in SOME, but not all, keeping their shoes on and laptops in - ergo expedited screening, wouldnt that suggest the dogs are
associated with offering expedited screening processes in regular lanes?

Would it not also suggest that dogs are not just a PR stunt but have some relation to security via Managed Inclusion aka Real Time Threat Assessment OR that the dog jobs are favor handed out to ensure a higher paycheck for a favored employee?

https://www.tsa.gov/tsa-precheck


Why should you join TSA Pre✓®?

TSA Pre✓® provides trusted travelers with expedited security screening for a better travel experience.
Plan your travel with confidence and enjoy a more predictable experience.
It’s a convenient, more efficient security screening process.
It’s available at more than 160 airports with 16 participating airlines.

No need to remove:

Shoes
Laptops
3-1-1 liquids
Belts
Light jackets

This is from the TSA website. Interestingly, unlike the signs at some airports, it no longer includes mention of a dedicated lane. I suspect TSA never meant to offer dedicated lanes on a consistent basis, only until they reached a certain enrollment level.

I suspect TSA envisions something I saw a few years ago. Every pax's BP will be coded according to a security score (Nappy tried to introduce such a score as a 'domestic extremist' rating). Based on that score, each pax's screening will be custom-tailored.

(OT, but if you think some of the things BDOs consider suspicious are ridiculous, you should have seen what earned you demerits under Nappy's system. One way, last-minute, cash airplane ticket: red alert. Ordering an airline special meal: demerits. Halal meals might signal...you know).

And then...they'll all get thrown into a single line at a checkpoint that has never had to follow a consistent set of rules. Some pax will be required to remove belts, others not; some will have to remove LGAs, some not. No one will have a clue what to expect, including the TSOs who make up the rules.

Then we have GE. Dedicated lanes, in the rare instance the kiosks are all malfunctioning, front-of-line privileges. A consistent, truly expedited process that gives the customer what s/he paid for.

GRALISTAIR Jun 15, 2016 12:44 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26783051)
I think what you are talking about is what is sometimes called Pre-Light.

Example, a person who has paid for Pre-Check finds the regular Pre-Check lane closed and is given a card to use in the regular lane.

That was my thought too.


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26783051)
What TSA should be doing is screening everyone using Pre-Check type standards and escalating screening for alarms. Everyone benefits, travelers and TSA staff.

EXACTLY -- WTMD as standard and if alarms then they get the microwave machine, shoes off etc.

chollie Jun 15, 2016 1:13 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26783051)
I think what you are talking about is what is sometimes called Pre-Light.

Example, a person who has paid for Pre-Check finds the regular Pre-Check lane closed and is given a card to use in the regular lane. What happens then is all over the board, they may get to keep shoes on or not, laptop may come out or not, and so forth. It certainly is not what the traveler signed up for and is not Pre-Check.

TSA has failed to properly staff Pre-Check lanes after selling an expedited screening product. In any other business there would be legal consequences for such a business practice.

What TSA should be doing is screening everyone using Pre-Check type standards and escalating screening for alarms. Everyone benefits, travelers and TSA staff.

'Pre-lite' is nothing more than what you get when you apply 'screener/FSD discretion' to Pre. Unpredictable, stupid, slow and pointless.

GRALISTAIR Jun 15, 2016 1:48 pm


Originally Posted by chollie (Post 26783551)
'Pre-lite' is nothing more than what you get when you apply 'screener/FSD discretion' to Pre. Unpredictable, stupid, slow and pointless.

I would not have put it quite like that - but you are pretty close to the mark. ;)

Boggie Dog Jun 15, 2016 3:09 pm


Originally Posted by chollie (Post 26783551)
'Pre-lite' is nothing more than what you get when you apply 'screener/FSD discretion' to Pre. Unpredictable, stupid, slow and pointless.

I'm not trying to justify Pre-Lite, in fact I think it is bait and switch.

Pre Check should be abandoned completely.

reclusive46 Jun 15, 2016 3:50 pm


Originally Posted by petaluma1 (Post 26782438)
I have read of exactly one instance of where pax were allowed to keep their shoes on during screening because of the dogs. If you know of others, please enlighten us. All other reports indicate there was no change in screening.

I saw this at Seattle yesterday. Everywhere up to a point along the line was allowed to keep their shows on.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.