Preclearance Expansion [merged threads]
#31
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TYO / WAS / NYC
Programs: American Express got a hit man lookin' for me
Posts: 4,600
At FRA a few years ago, I encountered an entry queue for EU citizens that was longer than the entry queue for non-citizens. My Japanese wife waited for me for a while on the other side of immigration and then commented that "your passport sucks."
#32
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: STL
Posts: 1,547
And the other way around of course, too. It makes sense - let people trickle in as they arrive for their train, rather than have large groups going through immigration at once when the train arrives.
#33
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The French let the British do pre-clearance on the French side of the Channel Tunnel...
At FRA a few years ago, I encountered an entry queue for EU citizens that was longer than the entry queue for non-citizens. My Japanese wife waited for me for a while on the other side of immigration and then commented that "your passport sucks."
At FRA a few years ago, I encountered an entry queue for EU citizens that was longer than the entry queue for non-citizens. My Japanese wife waited for me for a while on the other side of immigration and then commented that "your passport sucks."
Also, I've seen the non-citizen lines at FRA, ARN, HEL, OSL and many other Schengen or EU airports be very small (to nearly non-existent) and yet the processing was so slow that the huge EU line cleared up in advance of me as a US passport holder.
Last edited by cblaisd; Jun 5, 2015 at 6:37 am Reason: merged poster's two consecutive posts
#34
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
How the U.S. Government approached this:
http://www.fiercehomelandsecurity.co...rli/2015-06-04
In response to a question from Chairwoman Candice Miller (R-Mich.) regarding the number of inbound travelers who would be pre-cleared with the expansion, Wagner said it would bring the total up to about 36 percent of all travelers to the United States.
She asked whether the drivers are security and/or trade in selecting these additional locations. He added that four criteria including security, facilitation, feasibility and strategic impact were used to determine where the program would expand.
"We looked at the number of terrorist watchlist hits coming through that airport or originating in that airport," he said. "We looked at the number of national security concerns identified through our National Targeting Center. And then we balanced it against similar facilitation and workload measures: the number of passengers, the impact to wait times in the United States, the number of what we call secondary referrals and enforcement actions originating out of these airports."
She asked whether the drivers are security and/or trade in selecting these additional locations. He added that four criteria including security, facilitation, feasibility and strategic impact were used to determine where the program would expand.
"We looked at the number of terrorist watchlist hits coming through that airport or originating in that airport," he said. "We looked at the number of national security concerns identified through our National Targeting Center. And then we balanced it against similar facilitation and workload measures: the number of passengers, the impact to wait times in the United States, the number of what we call secondary referrals and enforcement actions originating out of these airports."
#35
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 79
Why Spain?
And really? This is an inconvenience on my part since that means I have to give up a few more hours of last minute shopping and dining just to come back home into the U.S.!
With few exceptions, other countries' airport security never make me take off my shoes and let me keep my light coat on and are much more polite than what I went through at my US origin airport leaving for a holiday.
And really? This is an inconvenience on my part since that means I have to give up a few more hours of last minute shopping and dining just to come back home into the U.S.!
With few exceptions, other countries' airport security never make me take off my shoes and let me keep my light coat on and are much more polite than what I went through at my US origin airport leaving for a holiday.
#37
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
More so Asian feed from beyond Japan, and trying to get CBP PreClearance to handle more than just a quarter of US-bound passengers.
The current announcement is to expand it to cover over 1/3 of US-bound passengers. Some in the USG want to see it in play for not just 1/3 of all U.S.-bound passengers but want it for the vast majority of VWP users because VWP countries' passport users are also seen as rather high "security" risk for the U.S.
Last edited by GUWonder; Jun 5, 2015 at 5:30 am
#38
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 79
Even then, they are nowhere as dangerous compared to other countries with unstable or strong theocratic governments!
Japan makes two or three passport checks when boarding an international plane and even fingerprints foreigners arriving in its country since 2007!
Japan makes two or three passport checks when boarding an international plane and even fingerprints foreigners arriving in its country since 2007!
#39
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Which countries have theocratic governments? Iran won't be getting CBP PreClearance, and Iranian passport users can't travel to the US without a U.S. G pre-clearance in the form of getting a US visa or other US travel doc. Even if the prospective host government would want such a facility, good luck finding CBP employees wanting to live there without diplomatic (not consular-like) cover. And even then, expect CBP to cost more to staff outside of the U.S. than inside of the U.S.
Countries with unstable or theocratic (if/when different) governments have passports that are good for travel to the US only in conjunction with a US visa or other US travel doc -- a sort of U.S. pre-clearance. It's VWP countries' citizens which are the main ones -- after Canadians and US immigrants -- to travel to the U.S. without a pre-travel manual doc check by USG employees. This, as with ESTA, is, in some twisted way, narrowing the "security" gap between VWP countries' US-bound visitors and non-VWP countries' US-bound visitors.
#40
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,037
Since there is an active thread on this in the Travel Safety/Security forum
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/check...-airports.html, let's move this to that forum and the mods there can merge if they wish.
cblaisd
Moderator, Travel News
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/check...-airports.html, let's move this to that forum and the mods there can merge if they wish.
cblaisd
Moderator, Travel News
#41
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YQR
Programs: NEXUS; alas, no status anymore.
Posts: 1,181
As to whether it's good or bad for travelers, it all depends on how well it's done. Personally I prefer clearing Customs at the beginning or the end of my trip, if I can. It prevents me from needing elongated periods of time to make a flight connection, and relieves me of stress. Whether I clear US Customs and Immigration in Toronto/Calgary or Denver/Minneapolis is not a huge issue to me since I'd be connecting anyway.
#42
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YQR
Programs: NEXUS; alas, no status anymore.
Posts: 1,181
I just travelled this route and we cleared French immigration (no Customs since it was the EU) at London St. Pancras. It reminded me of clearing Swiss Customs & Immigration a few years ago; the officer didn't say a word to either of us.
#43
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: FRA
Posts: 1,398
I think the train example is of setting up a light touch passport control in a neighboring country on the same continent if it logistically makes sense is a completely different story from setting up preclearance facilities with invasive questioning, fingerprinting, mug shots etc., that likely violate the laws of the host countries and therefor require immunity of the agents.
Also, I don't see why from a commecial perspective a European airline would want to have this at their hub. When choosing a flight that requires a connection factors are:
1. price
2. end-to-end travel time
3. convenience, peace of mind
For an American airline on the other hand, it would be attractive to move this problem out of their hubs, wich explains their support.
Also, I don't see why from a commecial perspective a European airline would want to have this at their hub. When choosing a flight that requires a connection factors are:
1. price
2. end-to-end travel time
3. convenience, peace of mind
For an American airline on the other hand, it would be attractive to move this problem out of their hubs, wich explains their support.
#44
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 288
Exactly. All this does it give them the ability of pressuring you to "co-operate" or miss your flight. I once waited them out for 11 hours at IAD before they finally realised I wasn't going to give them what they wanted, nor was I going to be intimidated.
#45
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Scarborough
Posts: 596
I'm glad we don't have to travel to the US pretty much.
It's always best to deal with customs/immigration at the other end (after arrival) rather than having to deal with it before the flight and ruining your journey with the experience beforehand.
Even if people's names are similar, their passport numbers are NEVER same. So quit with the stupid excuses for unnecessary secondary inspection CBP
It's always best to deal with customs/immigration at the other end (after arrival) rather than having to deal with it before the flight and ruining your journey with the experience beforehand.
Even if people's names are similar, their passport numbers are NEVER same. So quit with the stupid excuses for unnecessary secondary inspection CBP