Ambiguous TSA/Law Enforcement Procedures
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Ambiguous TSA/Law Enforcement Procedures
When a gun is found at a security checkpoint why is it that sometimes the person is arrested and other times the gun is just confiscated? You would think there would be a standard procedure for this. Personally I'd rather the gun just be given back to the passenger and have them arrange a new flight. As far as I know no one has actually tried to get a gun past security and instead simply forgot it was in the luggage. If this belongs in OMNI/PR then feel free to move it there.
#2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
AFAIK, when TSOs find a gun at a security checkpoint, they are supposed to immediately summon local law enforcement. TSOs have no arrest authority; the decision whether or not to arrest the passenger lies solely with the responding LEO.
At that point, the question of arrest versus forfeiture becomes one of understanding the myriad number of local laws dealing with possession of firearms --- and there's no reason to expect that those laws will treat similar incidents in similar ways.
At that point, the question of arrest versus forfeiture becomes one of understanding the myriad number of local laws dealing with possession of firearms --- and there's no reason to expect that those laws will treat similar incidents in similar ways.
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The arrest-no arrest decision is made by law enforcement on the spot. But, the decision to prosecute or not is made by the US Attorney on the federal violation and by a local prosecutor if there is a local violation as well.
LEO's have vast discretion as to whether to make an arrest, not just on this charge, but on any. That is why they likely temporarily detain the individual and get some preliminary facts and do some preliminary database checking. No criminal record, no history of violence, rational story and so on, there really is no reason to arrest.
But, that is not the end of it. In theory, the US Attorney could file a charge or seek an indictment for five years. Not likely once the initial determination is made, but possible.
I would strongly disagree with mandatory policies in situations such as this. I don't excuse the conduct, e.g., carrying a firearm. But, I am not sure that anybody needs to sit in lockup for as long as 72 hours waiting to appear in court, when they aren't an immediate danger and can easily be located.
LEO's have vast discretion as to whether to make an arrest, not just on this charge, but on any. That is why they likely temporarily detain the individual and get some preliminary facts and do some preliminary database checking. No criminal record, no history of violence, rational story and so on, there really is no reason to arrest.
But, that is not the end of it. In theory, the US Attorney could file a charge or seek an indictment for five years. Not likely once the initial determination is made, but possible.
I would strongly disagree with mandatory policies in situations such as this. I don't excuse the conduct, e.g., carrying a firearm. But, I am not sure that anybody needs to sit in lockup for as long as 72 hours waiting to appear in court, when they aren't an immediate danger and can easily be located.
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,617
The arrest-no arrest decision is made by law enforcement on the spot. But, the decision to prosecute or not is made by the US Attorney on the federal violation and by a local prosecutor if there is a local violation as well.
LEO's have vast discretion as to whether to make an arrest, not just on this charge, but on any. That is why they likely temporarily detain the individual and get some preliminary facts and do some preliminary database checking. No criminal record, no history of violence, rational story and so on, there really is no reason to arrest.
But, that is not the end of it. In theory, the US Attorney could file a charge or seek an indictment for five years. Not likely once the initial determination is made, but possible.
LEO's have vast discretion as to whether to make an arrest, not just on this charge, but on any. That is why they likely temporarily detain the individual and get some preliminary facts and do some preliminary database checking. No criminal record, no history of violence, rational story and so on, there really is no reason to arrest.
But, that is not the end of it. In theory, the US Attorney could file a charge or seek an indictment for five years. Not likely once the initial determination is made, but possible.
#5
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 156
I don't believe there's a federal criminal charge. Georgia for instance has decriminalized permit holders from carrying guns to the tsa checkpoints. I think the tsa can still try and levy a civil charge, but otherwise the person is just told to go take the gun back out of the checkpoint so I have heard. So in otherwords, it probably depends entirely on the locality as to criminality. I have no direct knowledge of this, nor am I lawyer.
#6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
When a gun is found at a security checkpoint why is it that sometimes the person is arrested and other times the gun is just confiscated? You would think there would be a standard procedure for this. Personally I'd rather the gun just be given back to the passenger and have them arrange a new flight. As far as I know no one has actually tried to get a gun past security and instead simply forgot it was in the luggage. If this belongs in OMNI/PR then feel free to move it there.
#7
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Yeah, this is completely up to the local LEOs that respond. I have seen a firearm discovery go both ways, in less than a week. You factor in the variance in local firearm laws and the amount of focus given to them, and you have a complete crap shoot as far as what you can expect from location to location. AFAIK, TSA has no standard requirements of the local LEOs other than response times and requirements of that nature. The fine system is fairly difficult to find and understand as well. I have been able to find no hard and fast rule for fines related to firearms in the checkpoint.
http://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/fil...nce_policy.pdf
Difficult to understand? No so much.
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,714
Difficult to find? I found it in less than 20 seconds, page 7 of this document:
http://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/fil...nce_policy.pdf
Difficult to understand? No so much.
http://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/fil...nce_policy.pdf
Difficult to understand? No so much.
#9
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,424
Difficult to find? I found it in less than 20 seconds, page 7 of this document:
http://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/fil...nce_policy.pdf
Difficult to understand? No so much.
http://www.tsa.gov/sites/default/fil...nce_policy.pdf
Difficult to understand? No so much.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
http://www.tsa.gov/civil-enforcement-policies
#11
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: YTZ
Posts: 502
I never understood how anyone could forget they're armed when approaching a security check point. If they actually forgot then that is a clear indication they may not posess the necessary discipline or respect to lawfully posess a deadly weapon.
Last edited by iMedic; Jan 22, 2015 at 10:37 am
#12
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,256
#13
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
Why do people forget they have "dangerous" large bottles of water when they approach the TSA checkpoint? These people must not possess the necessary discipline/respect to lawfully possess large bottles of water.
#14
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: YTZ
Posts: 502