Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Very loose security at LAX...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 1:08 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 258
Very loose security at LAX...?

So I flew out of LAX a few days ago. I am a lowly Silver Medallion, so I was fully prepared to just go through the general security line, but they had a TSA agent looking at everyone's boarding pass and directing them to the correct line. To my surprise, she motioned me (and my non-elite companion) to what I assumed was the Sky Priority line.

Where I ended up, with about five people in front of me, there were no bins. I was quite confused especially as I saw the people in front of me go through a simple metal detector (not the full body scanner that the "normies" were using), without taking off their shoes or taking anything -- laptops, etc -- out of their bags. My companion and I had the same treatment.

As an exclusive post-9/11 flyer, this was the simplest and most stress-free security experience I've ever had. I'm certainly not complaining, but was this correct procedure? Is this actually the way Sky Priority security at LAX works? Especially with a companion who has no status?

(P.S. Ironically, LAX is the only airport where I've ever been "randomly selected for secondary screening" so this was a nice surprise!)
markraby is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 1:15 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Gainesville, FL
Programs: DL DM, HH Diamond, EC Executive Elite
Posts: 55
Very loose security at LAX...?

same thing just now at IAD. the precheck line was open for everyone. I'm guessing its to promote precheck but none of the people in line knew they were in a PreCheck line.
sinister2c is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 1:37 pm
  #3  
us2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Southern California/In the air
Programs: DL
Posts: 10,380
This should be the norm rather than being termed "loose security".
us2 is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 1:48 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Programs: DL DM, HH Gold, SPG Gold, Hyatt Plat
Posts: 2,874
TSA is starting to really vamp up pre check. I think they have publicly stated they want a large portion if travelers to (randomly) get it. I've seen many instances of TSA sending normal pax through precheck when the precheck line is below capacity and normal line is full.

My only gripe is when people encounter pre for the first time they tend to take a loooong time. I see them still taking laptops and liquids out, removing shoes, etc.
roknroll is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 1:52 pm
  #5  
10 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Gulf Coast
Programs: Hilton Honors Lifetime Diamond; National Car Rental Executive Elite
Posts: 2,786
Originally Posted by roknroll
TSA is starting to really vamp up pre check. I think they have publicly stated they want a large portion if travelers to (randomly) get it. I've seen many instances of TSA sending normal pax through precheck when the precheck line is below capacity and normal line is full.

My only gripe is when people encounter pre for the first time they tend to take a loooong time. I see them still taking laptops and liquids out, removing shoes, etc.
107 flights with DL in the past 11 months. I've had PreCheck once.

I went to take off my boots (steel toed) and the TSA agent said it wasn't necessary. I told him they had steel toes, and he looked at me like I had a 3rd eye. He tell me to walk through the metal detector and it alarms. I ended up the back room of CVG getting a full-on pat down and interview because my boots alarmed the residue sniffer.

I'm all for quicker, more efficient security screenings. The TSA needs to do their part and make sure their employees are trained on how to effectively communicate the new policies/procedures to avoid hang-ups like I've experienced.
aww3583 is online now  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 1:53 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 25
CVG has been doing this selective pre-check bonus for months, as has LAS and many other airports. Sometimes they add an extra hand swab, but even that's been absent lately from what I can tell. I'd agree that the notion is to get more people in pre check whether they pay $85 or not.
HenryTheNoodle is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 1:58 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BOS/ORH
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 18,346
Originally Posted by roknroll
TSA is starting to really vamp up pre check. I think they have publicly stated they want a large portion if travelers to (randomly) get it. I've seen many instances of TSA sending normal pax through precheck when the precheck line is below capacity and normal line is full.

My only gripe is when people encounter pre for the first time they tend to take a loooong time. I see them still taking laptops and liquids out, removing shoes, etc.
The biggest isue is not that the floodgates are opening but there is not enough staffing or lanes open to handle the extra passengers. Doesnt matter if its 20 it 2000 passengers it stays the same.
CDKing is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 2:05 pm
  #8  
Moderator: Hilton Honors forums
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marietta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 25,437
Exclamation Thread Alert

The new home for this topic is the Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate forum, which is more appropriate for this discussion than the Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles forum.

Regards,

Canarsie
Co-Moderator, Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles forum
Canarsie is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 2:05 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,295
This is not loose security, this would be more along the lines of flying with dignity.

But alas, it is just Precheck.
WIRunner is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 2:06 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, UA Silver, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Titanium, Nat'l EE, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,637
Originally Posted by us2
This should be the norm rather than being termed "loose security".
^
javabytes is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 2:08 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Programs: DL Silver, AS MVP, UA Silver, HHonors Diamond, Marriott Plat, SPG Plat, National Exec Elite
Posts: 3,883
I've been getting PreCheck randomly pretty often for the past couple of months and noticed a "TSA Randomizer" iPad (or similar tablet) app being used to send people to either regular lanes or PreCheck. This is nice because I'm AS MVPG flying a lot on Delta, so I have no chance of getting PreCheck on my BP without paying and interviewing (which I would do if I were ever departing ATL during interview hours).

That said, both locations I've seen with the "TSA Randomizer" were also doing random palm-wipe checks on those that were sent to the PreCheck lane. At one location (MDW) I was palm checked before PreCheck lane AND after XRay when they questioned my DE razor with no blade installed.

More than anything I would just like to see some consistency...
IsleOfMan is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 2:37 pm
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 258
Like I said, I never had the luxury of flying before 9/11 so I guess I have just become too used to the current process as being "the norm" :P

It's certainly encouraging to hear that this was not just a fluke and in fact might be part of a deeper push to ameliorate the security process across the board
markraby is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 3:53 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, UA Silver, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Titanium, Nat'l EE, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,637
Originally Posted by markraby
Like I said, I never had the luxury of flying before 9/11 so I guess I have just become too used to the current process as being "the norm" :P

It's certainly encouraging to hear that this was not just a fluke and in fact might be part of a deeper push to ameliorate the security process across the board
Sadly even many people who did fly before 9/11 have become too used to the current process and accepted it as the "norm".
javabytes is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 3:58 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
Originally Posted by roknroll
TSA is starting to really vamp up pre check. I think they have publicly stated they want a large portion if travelers to (randomly) get it. I've seen many instances of TSA sending normal pax through precheck when the precheck line is below capacity and normal line is full.

My only gripe is when people encounter pre for the first time they tend to take a loooong time. I see them still taking laptops and liquids out, removing shoes, etc.
Did you mean to say "vamp" or was it "ramp"? Just got a not-too-pleasant visual of TSA clerks trying to act sexy...
DeafBlonde is offline  
Old Jun 19, 2014 | 4:23 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by roknroll
TSA is starting to really vamp up pre check. I think they have publicly stated they want a large portion if travelers to (randomly) get it. I've seen many instances of TSA sending normal pax through precheck when the precheck line is below capacity and normal line is full.

My only gripe is when people encounter pre for the first time they tend to take a loooong time. I see them still taking laptops and liquids out, removing shoes, etc.
Actually, I think TSA was directed by Congress to have 75% of passengers going through PreCheck by the end of 2014.
petaluma1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.