Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Sky Marshals powers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2014 | 8:26 am
  #31  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10
Thank you
The last two posts have given me the answer
Kitdun2000 is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 1:20 am
  #32  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10
And a few more questions, guys
What will the airplane crew do, if for some reason Marshall decides to discover himself?
If a crime is committed on board by someone unknown and chances are that it is threatening the safety, or it will repeat, will they respond, or just let the airplane land as soon as possible?
Does the crew get the information who is their Marshall, if he or she is present?
Kitdun2000 is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 2:51 am
  #33  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Flight crew -- at least one of them on board -- know who the FAMs are on their flight. Traditionally they have also been informed about the other armed LEOs or authorized cabin gun-bearing passengers on their flights.

I am speaking of US airlines here. Foreign airlines with armed guards don't have all the same practices, even as many of the practices are very much akin.

Are you trying to write a sequel to a movie or a new movie plot? It's already been considered.

Last edited by GUWonder; Apr 5, 2014 at 2:57 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 1:48 pm
  #34  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10
No, I am not interested in making a new movie, at least, for now, I am not a moviemaker.
That is just for my information
I have read, that in case the Marshall decides to do something, the crew should provide coordinated response, to assist him.
Anybody knows, what does it mean?
Is there anything, besides an armed hijacker in sight, that the Marshalls should respond to?
Kitdun2000 is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 6:31 pm
  #35  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by Kitdun2000
Is there anything, besides an armed hijacker in sight, that the Marshalls should respond to?
It's generally regarded as reasonable for them to start shooting if the pax in steerage try to use the toilets in First, or if the bubbly runs out. HTH
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 10:19 pm
  #36  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,532
Originally Posted by SeriouslyLost
It's generally regarded as reasonable for them to start shooting if the pax in steerage try to use the toilets in First, or if the bubbly runs out. HTH
I heard they can start shooting when someone asks too many questions about their job and ask later!

Last edited by NextTrip; Apr 5, 2014 at 10:33 pm
NextTrip is offline  
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 10:36 pm
  #37  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,532
Originally Posted by Kitdun2000
Thank you
The last two posts have given me the answer
But wait, there's more!
Originally Posted by Kitdun2000
And a few more questions, guys
What will the airplane crew do, if for some reason Marshall decides to discover himself?
If a crime is committed on board by someone unknown and chances are that it is threatening the safety, or it will repeat, will they respond, or just let the airplane land as soon as possible?
Does the crew get the information who is their Marshall, if he or she is present?
NextTrip is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 6:42 am
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BOS/ORH
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 18,346
Originally Posted by Kitdun2000
No, I am not interested in making a new movie, at least, for now, I am not a moviemaker.
That is just for my information
I have read, that in case the Marshall decides to do something, the crew should provide coordinated response, to assist him.
Anybody knows, what does it mean?
Is there anything, besides an armed hijacker in sight, that the Marshalls should respond to?
Keep asking too many questions and the feds will be knocking on your door
CDKing is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 7:04 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
Originally Posted by CDKing
Keep asking too many questions and the feds will be knocking on your door
Asking questions is not a crime. I'm not sure why people are jumping on the OP for that.
Schmurrr is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 10:08 am
  #40  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,532
Originally Posted by Schmurrr
Asking questions is not a crime. I'm not sure why people are jumping on the OP for that.
But, too many questions sends up red flags.
NextTrip is offline  
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 3:18 pm
  #41  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by Schmurrr
Asking questions is not a crime. I'm not sure why people are jumping on the OP for that.
Because the questions are (mostly) silly?
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 9:04 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: everywhere
Posts: 55
I was on a flight early last year from LAS back to JFK when about halfway through something broke out with a drunk passenger. I don't know what exactly happened but for the first time ever I saw a sky marshal go into "action". I use quotes because quite honestly he didn't seem to know what to do and looked as clueless as any of us. The flight attendants took more action in calming this man down than the sky marshal did. He mostly just stood there with his hand extended out towards the man and kept warning him that he would be detained if he didn't sit down. The drunk guy couldn't care less.

They are just another part of the entire homeland theater on display with respect to flying.
SpartanTraveler is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 9:42 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
Originally Posted by NextTrip
But, too many questions sends up red flags.
So law enforcement should stop by his/her house? So he/she ought to be wiretapped?

If I ask TSA employees a bunch of questions at the airport, is law enforcement thus justified in coming to my home, reading my e-mails, tapping my phone, etc.?
Schmurrr is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 3:15 pm
  #44  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by Schmurrr
So law enforcement should stop by his/her house? So he/she ought to be wiretapped?

If I ask TSA employees a bunch of questions at the airport, is law enforcement thus justified in coming to my home, reading my e-mails, tapping my phone, etc.?

Do you want the "reasonable & sane person person" answer of the "US law enforcement and security services" answer?
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Apr 8, 2014 | 7:36 pm
  #45  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,532
Originally Posted by Schmurrr
So law enforcement should stop by his/her house? So he/she ought to be wiretapped?

If I ask TSA employees a bunch of questions at the airport, is law enforcement thus justified in coming to my home, reading my e-mails, tapping my phone, etc.?
God, no! I never said they SHOULD.
NextTrip is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.