You asked for it: Independant Proof
#46
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wherever liberty is threatened
Programs: TSA Disparager Silver
Posts: 314
You should have read the report. Standing in your house you get as much radiation in 1.8 minutes as a single scan by the backscatter systems. Once you are on the plane and flying, it only takes 12 seconds to get the same dose.
Given your theory on the concept someone who is 100 years old should be glowing and toxic to the touch. The human body is pretty good at throwing off minute amounts of radiation, otherwise we would all have real problems.
Given your theory on the concept someone who is 100 years old should be glowing and toxic to the touch. The human body is pretty good at throwing off minute amounts of radiation, otherwise we would all have real problems.
My doctor has a 10 Watt light in his office that he uses to burn warts. It has a caution to never look directly at the light.
#47
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
#48
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: Delta Diamond Medallion 1MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, National Car Executive Elite
Posts: 550
I'm beginning to think that TSOs are just politicians in training. After all, think of this similarity in behavior, attitude, and personality between TSOs and politicians....
Both think they're the smartest people in the world on every subject just because they were given a uniform/"won" an election (benefit of the doubt, seeing how many suspicious election shenanigans occur).
Poxes on both their heads and houses.
Both think they're the smartest people in the world on every subject just because they were given a uniform/"won" an election (benefit of the doubt, seeing how many suspicious election shenanigans occur).
Poxes on both their heads and houses.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
"WASHINGTON, DC - A new report by an independent task force commissioned by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), has found that people absorb less radiation from airport X-ray backscatter scanner than they do while standing in line waiting for the scan itself."
More at the link below:
http://www.eturbonews.com/35763/radi...much-do-we-get
More at the link below:
http://www.eturbonews.com/35763/radi...much-do-we-get
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Yup. My wife has retinal burns from a light that was less than 1 watt. (Done by a retinologist, not an accident.)
#51
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
As for the report, I'm not going to do your reading for you. Not for any of you. Read it or dont, follow to the actual report and read that, or dont. No skin off my nose in any case.
If you folks absolutely need something to be scared of, read the link below. THIS I find terrifying in it implications.
LINK
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
As for the report, I'm not going to do your reading for you.
Not for any of you. Read it or dont, follow to the actual report and read that, or dont. No skin off my nose in any case.
What is ironic is that, whereas I actually read the entire report before posting my response to you, you had only read a travel-industry blog entry that summarized it. That, by the way, is one of the reasons why I would never ask you to do any reading for me.
If you folks absolutely need something to be scared of, read the link below.
#53
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Thought you said you weren't coming back, but I guess you couldn't control your fingers on the keyboard.
In any case, I am back out again. Fun to watch the show but I have no further interest in participating. I'll check in every now and again, just to keep my account active and to see just how far off the edge some are willing to walk. As you type just think of me laughing in the background at the statement you make.
WRT your link, are you worried that the government will take over your ham radio?
The history of this executive order seems to be that Congress dilled and dallied for a couple of years over legislation to allow the government to take over communications in the event of an emergency but they never took any action. Therefore, after a couple of natural disasters, the President acted. One comment listened to from EPIC, is that better DHS than the military having the responsibility for any take over.
What a totally bizarre, illogical statement to make. However, I guess it's about what we expect from you.
BTW, I, too, have had melanoma and have a 5" long scar.
How about you read this, Ron, to educate yourself:
http://www.telmarc.com/White%20Paper...ackscatter.pdf
In any case, I am back out again. Fun to watch the show but I have no further interest in participating. I'll check in every now and again, just to keep my account active and to see just how far off the edge some are willing to walk. As you type just think of me laughing in the background at the statement you make.

The history of this executive order seems to be that Congress dilled and dallied for a couple of years over legislation to allow the government to take over communications in the event of an emergency but they never took any action. Therefore, after a couple of natural disasters, the President acted. One comment listened to from EPIC, is that better DHS than the military having the responsibility for any take over.
Walking down the street is not safe. Neither is sleeping, breathing, or pumping blood through your heart.
BTW, I, too, have had melanoma and have a 5" long scar.
How about you read this, Ron, to educate yourself:
http://www.telmarc.com/White%20Paper...ackscatter.pdf

