![]() |
Originally Posted by SWCPHX
(Post 20764084)
Anybody can make a citizen's arrest, that's what store security and loss prevention does. Not advocating that TSA should make arrests, but the idea that they can't is just a fallacy. In most instances, whenever a sworn law enforcement officer makes an arrest for a misdemeanor committed outside of their presence, what they're really doing is taking custody of somebody that has been placed under a citizen's arrest by a private individual.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 20764533)
Everybody can, without consequence, seize another person's illegal drugs in the name of making a "citizen's arrest" if supposedly intending to turn over the seized illegal drugs to law enforcement officials?
My guess would be that if a TSA clerk found marijuana on somebody they would have to turn it over to a sworn law enforcement officer for proper impounding as evidence. If the only sworn law enforcement officer present was state or local, I would assume that they would defer to their department's policy on what to do with marijuana if it is for medicinal reasons. If the TSA clerk failed to turn over the marijuana for impounding then arguably the person who had possessed the marijuana could probably file a petty theft complaint (assuming that their possession was medicinal in purpose) but then they'd face the risk of revealing that they were in possession of marijuana. Probably could complain anonymously that so and so TSA clerk stole marijuana and never impounded it though. Store security/loss prevention people quite often find meth or crack on people that they detain for theft. They hold on to the drugs and give it to the officer when they show up to take the report or take custody of the person being detained. |
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 20764138)
The only true L/E function at TSA is carried out by the FAMS. The remainder of TSA implements/excercises the federal regulatory scheme that governs aviation safety.
TSA does have 1811s that are in fact Special Agents.....just like the FBI/ICE/USMS/DEA/etc.... They are OIG (Office of the Inspector General Office) SA's..... |
Originally Posted by SWCPHX
(Post 20764612)
My guess would be that if a TSA clerk found marijuana on somebody they would have to turn it over to a sworn law enforcement officer for proper impounding as evidence. If the only sworn law enforcement officer present was state or local, I would assume that they would defer to their department's policy on what to do with marijuana if it is for medicinal reasons. We had policies and procedures in place to deal with things....up to arresting folks and securing the dope as evidence...... I haven't worked there since 05 so I have no idea what they are doing....but I strongly think its the same deal now as then.... |
Originally Posted by eyecue
(Post 20763571)
Just sayin in function only, what TSA does is law enforcement.
Congress made the law establishing DHS/TSA. DHS/TSA then set regulations to be followed at checkpoints. |
Originally Posted by petaluma1
(Post 20765647)
Not according to one of your compatriots. TSA enforces regulations, not laws.
Congress made the law establishing DHS/TSA. DHS/TSA then set regulations to be followed at checkpoints. |
it is interesting in DEN now with the new legalization of marijuana. We are obligated to inform local police who are without any leg to stand on. TSA has no way to direct file for that kind of violation of federal laws.
|
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
(Post 20765393)
Not entirely correct.
TSA does have 1811s that are in fact Special Agents.....just like the FBI/ICE/USMS/DEA/etc.... They are OIG (Office of the Inspector General Office) SA's..... |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
(Post 20764533)
Everybody can, without consequence, seize another person's illegal drugs in the name of making a "citizen's arrest" if supposedly intending to turn over the seized illegal drugs to law enforcement officials?
|
How would a TSA x-ray operator differentiate finely ground MJ from, say, tea or spices?
What would be the probable result of a TSA agent finding a small amount of MJ in LAX, SFO, OAK, or LGB? In DEN or SEA? If no non-TSA FLEO is available, the local LEOs (with proof of medical status if applicable) would return the MJ to the pax and send them on their way, right? |
Originally Posted by mbstone
(Post 20768533)
How would a TSA x-ray operator differentiate finely ground MJ from, say, tea or spices?
What would be the probable result of a TSA agent finding a small amount of MJ in LAX, SFO, OAK, or LGB? In DEN or SEA? See eyecue's post - in DEN, TSA summons the local police, but the local police can no longer take action. See also the special directive that had to be issued to the Sheriff's office of Alameda County (OAK) to remind the Sheriff that although he disagrees with the law, he still has to enforce it as it stands (ie, not pursue medical MJ possession, even when summoned by TSA. I think sooner or later TSA is going to summon federal authorities in the jurisdictions you mention, since MJ is a federal crime. Question is, are the local authorities required to detain the pax until the feds arrive or will TSA find other inventive ways to get around the 'no detention' limitation to keep the pax at the checkpoint. Motivated TSOs could initiate a 'random' secondary, including making copies of the pax ID and BP. If that didn't delay things long enough for a FLEO to arrive, with the ID/BP information, the pax would be easy to find in the terminal. |
Are USCBP federal LEOs? Could they arrest someone for marijuana possession?
|
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 20767803)
true - I overlooked that extremely small group of 1811's. a drop in the bucket compared to total TSA employment.
|
Originally Posted by stifle
(Post 20770342)
Are USCBP federal LEOs? Could they arrest someone for marijuana possession?
|
So could the TSA conceivably call them to the checkpoint at an international airport if they found dope in one of their 4th amendment violating searches?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.