![]() |
Originally Posted by y2k1jetta
(Post 20339831)
I am Pre and never take them off my shoes but thanks for assuming.
|
Why could that have some kind of device you put your shoe in while on your feet that scans for dangerous objects. Maybe someone could invent something.
|
Originally Posted by buckeyefanflyer
(Post 20340234)
Why could that have some kind of device you put your shoe in while on your feet that scans for dangerous objects. Maybe someone could invent something.
|
Originally Posted by Katie McFadden, "reporter" for TravelersToday.com
The TSA also misses weapons sometimes.
Perhaps you should stick to your other hard-hitting news stories, such as Chicken Causes a Power Outage at a Maui Airport. :rolleyes: |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope
If the shoe fits? Seriously though: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/24/us...orts.html?_r=0 lot of money wasted so far. you know... I wish I could elaborate... but any explanation will give an excuse for knocks on my door. And a metal detector is a metal detector.... I guess TSA was too stupid and arrogant to be consistent in demanding a capacity to detect non-metallic explosives as the original incident which led to the shoe carnival used modified sneakers. |
Originally Posted by N965VJ
(Post 20340754)
If you had done even the smallest amount of research, you would know that the TSA's Red Team failure rates are "off the charts" according to U.S. Rep. John Mica.
Perhaps you should stick to your other hard-hitting news stories, such as Chicken Causes a Power Outage at a Maui Airport. :rolleyes: http://www.wftv.com/news/news/micas-...-questi/nPJLX/ there are plenty of other sources to go to, but if anything, Mica's frequent op eds are always about pushing privatizing (but would still have to follow TSA procedures anyway) For your point: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1028898.html Still though... he just kind of says it... I can't find any corroboration. And what does that even mean anyway? All I can say is I've seen parts of the FAA red team component kits (long since retired).... and I'm astounded that there weren't perfect scores back then... Considering that one can fail DESPITE finding the WEI because of procedural esoterica, I'd expect failures. For mine: "TSA officials stated that they do not want airports to achieve a 100 percent pass rate during covert tests because they believe that high pass rates would indicate that covert tests were too easy and therefore were not an effective tool to identify vulnerabilities in the system." p.31 "TSA Has Developed a Risk-Based Covert Testing Program, but Could Better Mitigate Aviation Security Vulnerabilities Identified Through Covert Tests" http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08958.pdf |
Originally Posted by Chaos.Defined
(Post 20340944)
And a metal detector is a metal detector.... I guess TSA was too stupid and arrogant to be consistent in demanding a capacity to detect non-metallic explosives as the original incident which led to the shoe carnival used modified sneakers. Furthermore, once again the TSA penalizes most people due to the action of a very small number of people. Explosives can be hidden anywhere: underwear, body orifices, etc. Yet the ETD is seldom used and ETP is mothballed because TSA was too lazy to change the filters regularly and calibrate to discern perfume. Congress should sequester the TSA right the hell out of existence. |
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 20341312)
TSA has ETD, had ETP, and is too stupid and arrogant to use either device regularly or consistently. I'd prefer a swab to being strip-searched any day of the week.
Furthermore, once again the TSA penalizes most people due to the action of a very small number of people. Explosives can be hidden anywhere: underwear, body orifices, etc. Yet the ETD is seldom used and ETP is mothballed because TSA was too lazy to change the filters regularly and calibrate to discern perfume. Congress should sequester the TSA right the hell out of existence. ETDs are in near constant use now, which is why they seem to be breaking down at an alarming rate. Not quite how the sequester is applied. Just go with Zero out funding, repeal ATSA, or any other way to destroy the TSA you want to go with. Congress should improve the state of our education system; we might find better solutions in the end. |
Originally Posted by Chaos.Defined
(Post 20340944)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe-fitting_fluoroscope
If the shoe fits? Seriously though: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/24/us...orts.html?_r=0 lot of money wasted so far. you know... I wish I could elaborate... but any explanation will give an excuse for knocks on my door. And a metal detector is a metal detector.... I guess TSA was too stupid and arrogant to be consistent in demanding a capacity to detect non-metallic explosives as the original incident which led to the shoe carnival used modified sneakers. |
Originally Posted by Chaos.Defined
(Post 20341438)
ETP was a nightmare to deal with requiring enormous downtime for maintenance. While I can't discuss the presence or absence of false positives, each time the machine alarmed required someone to clean the entire portal- hardly efficient for heavy traffic.
ETDs are in near constant use now, which is why they seem to be breaking down at an alarming rate. Not quite how the sequester is applied. Just go with Zero out funding, repeal ATSA, or any other way to destroy the TSA you want to go with. Congress should improve the state of our education system; we might find better solutions in the end. |
Originally Posted by y2k1jetta
(Post 20338808)
|
Originally Posted by Chaos.Defined
(Post 20341438)
ETP was a nightmare to deal with requiring enormous downtime for maintenance. While I can't discuss the presence or absence of false positives, each time the machine alarmed required someone to clean the entire portal- hardly efficient for heavy traffic.
ETDs are in near constant use now, which is why they seem to be breaking down at an alarming rate. Not quite how the sequester is applied. Just go with Zero out funding, repeal ATSA, or any other way to destroy the TSA you want to go with. Congress should improve the state of our education system; we might find better solutions in the end. If/when the ETDs 'break down', do you mean stop working entirely or start generating false positives? |
Originally Posted by Chaos.Defined
(Post 20341438)
ETP was a nightmare to deal with requiring enormous downtime for maintenance.
Video Link. EDIT: Note that nobody is being hollered at for taking pictures or video there. :rolleyes: http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...ps6c0c0080.jpg |
I am sure there is a simple and possibly logical answer to this question: Why is there not a WTMD in the path to the entrance of the AIT? Would that not cover more possibilities?
I know, more expense (like that matters) and another form of false positives. But really, the WTMD is good at metal the AIT is not. It seems a combination of both would be better from their standpoint. Why is it one or the other? |
The Smiths IonSentinel II + WTMD makes a lot more sense.
It really isn't rocket science to calibrate these machines properly - the TSA instead chooses to waste its person power checking IDs/BPs, limiting liquids, barking at passengers, sniffing shoes, worrying about items that have no effect on aircraft or airport safety, gate harassing passengers who have already been harassed.... The list goes on and on about how TSA wastes its time on passenger harassment. Then the TSA whines about being understaffed, so it can't possibly maintain the IonSentinels in real-time. Gimme a break. :rolleyes: Kick the government out of our airports and those IonSentinels will work just fine. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:51 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.