Wall Street Journal: Baby bottles shut Newark (EWR) airport checkpoint
Jan 26, 2013, 7:05 pm
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 10,308
Wall Street Journal: Baby bottles shut Newark (EWR) airport checkpoint
Another incident at the airport that really needs its own TS&S subforum:
The Wall Street Journal:
Baby bottles shut Newark airport checkpoint
Updated January 25, 2013, 2:12 p.m. ET
A short quote:
The Wall Street Journal:
Baby bottles shut Newark airport checkpoint
Updated January 25, 2013, 2:12 p.m. ET
A short quote:
A couple and their toddler had already gone through the checkpoint when security officials determined that equipment that screens liquids had malfunctioned and the baby bottles hadn't been properly screened.
The family was located and brought back to the checkpoint to have the bottles and their luggage re-screened.
The checkpoint was closed for approximately 30 minutes.
The family was located and brought back to the checkpoint to have the bottles and their luggage re-screened.
The checkpoint was closed for approximately 30 minutes.
Jan 26, 2013, 9:05 pm
#6
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
And the Secret Service wrestled the bottles of baby formula to the ground...
I give up with EWR
(he says as he's waiting for his redeye flight LAX-EWR 
)
I give up with EWR
(he says as he's waiting for his redeye flight LAX-EWR )
Jan 27, 2013, 5:45 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
If you choose to depart from there on your return, that's your fault
Jan 27, 2013, 6:51 am
#8
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Back in YYZ after 3 years of expat life in LHR
Programs: AC SE100K
Posts: 924
Loved this quote from the Taking Sense Away blog writer.
Newark is like the little ....... problem child airport-within-the-problem-child-agency that is the TSA, an ongoing sentiment I’ve heard from screeners across the nation.
Jan 27, 2013, 7:35 am
#9
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Never having traveled with a baby, I am wondering this:
Exactly what "equipment" is used to "screen" baby formula and other medically necessary liquids? Is it chemical? Radiological? Ultrasonic? Does the container have to be opened, exposing the liquid contents to potential contamination or exposure to unsterile conditions at the c/p?
This would naturally be a matter of grave concern to anyone traveling with liquids that will later be consumed by someone.
Exactly what "equipment" is used to "screen" baby formula and other medically necessary liquids? Is it chemical? Radiological? Ultrasonic? Does the container have to be opened, exposing the liquid contents to potential contamination or exposure to unsterile conditions at the c/p?
This would naturally be a matter of grave concern to anyone traveling with liquids that will later be consumed by someone.
Jan 27, 2013, 10:37 am
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
Never having traveled with a baby, I am wondering this:
Exactly what "equipment" is used to "screen" baby formula and other medically necessary liquids? Is it chemical? Radiological? Ultrasonic? Does the container have to be opened, exposing the liquid contents to potential contamination or exposure to unsterile conditions at the c/p?
This would naturally be a matter of grave concern to anyone traveling with liquids that will later be consumed by someone.
Exactly what "equipment" is used to "screen" baby formula and other medically necessary liquids? Is it chemical? Radiological? Ultrasonic? Does the container have to be opened, exposing the liquid contents to potential contamination or exposure to unsterile conditions at the c/p?
This would naturally be a matter of grave concern to anyone traveling with liquids that will later be consumed by someone.
The sequence of events as reported doesn't make sense.
For example: a screener doesn't rub me all over, take off the gloves, tell me 'you can go' and then process his gloves for ETD, because if the test does come back positive, duh, I'm long gone.
The article specifically mentions equipment malfunction, not that the pax were told 'step over here and wait for an assist to test your baby drinks', while someone took the suspicious fluids and someone else watched to make sure pax didn't leave the area before the fluids were cleared.
I can't envision a scenario (except stupidity and carelessness all around) that makes sense.
A TSO tests the liquids, says 'you are good to go', mentions the test to another TSO who says 'hey, that machine is out of order?'
Or a TSO tests the liquids, says 'you are good to go', mentions the test to another TSO who says 'hey, you did the test wrong?'
And the roving (or standing gaping at the podium) LTSO's and STSO's were...where? doing ...what? while this was going on?
Last edited by chollie; Jan 27, 2013 at 10:43 am
Jan 27, 2013, 10:45 am
#11
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: in the sky
Posts: 490
The infant formula is opened and tested underneath a sneeze guard or SOMEthing to minimize airborne contamination I wish/hope especially during an especially virulent flu season! Clean gloves donned for the test without prompting at the very least?
Jan 27, 2013, 10:50 am
#12
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,490
I've travelled with a friend with an infant. On that occasion, at that airport (LAX), at that checkpoint (T6, IIRC), each container had to be opened and a test strip was waved over it.
The sequence of events as reported doesn't make sense.
For example: a screener doesn't rub me all over, take off the gloves, tell me 'you can go' and then process his gloves for ETD, because if the test does come back positive, duh, I'm long gone.
The article specifically mentions equipment malfunction, not that the pax were told 'step over here and wait for an assist to test your baby drinks', while someone took the suspicious fluids and someone else watched to make sure pax didn't leave the area before the fluids were cleared.
I can't envision a scenario (except stupidity and carelessness all around) that makes sense.
A TSO tests the liquids, says 'you are good to go', mentions the test to another TSO who says 'hey, that machine is out of order?'
Or a TSO tests the liquids, says 'you are good to go', mentions the test to another TSO who says 'hey, you did the test wrong?'
And the roving (or standing gaping at the podium) LTSO's and STSO's were...where? doing ...what? while this was going on?
The sequence of events as reported doesn't make sense.
For example: a screener doesn't rub me all over, take off the gloves, tell me 'you can go' and then process his gloves for ETD, because if the test does come back positive, duh, I'm long gone.
The article specifically mentions equipment malfunction, not that the pax were told 'step over here and wait for an assist to test your baby drinks', while someone took the suspicious fluids and someone else watched to make sure pax didn't leave the area before the fluids were cleared.
I can't envision a scenario (except stupidity and carelessness all around) that makes sense.
A TSO tests the liquids, says 'you are good to go', mentions the test to another TSO who says 'hey, that machine is out of order?'
Or a TSO tests the liquids, says 'you are good to go', mentions the test to another TSO who says 'hey, you did the test wrong?'
And the roving (or standing gaping at the podium) LTSO's and STSO's were...where? doing ...what? while this was going on?
) but on the return the TSA had Mrs. Fredd open the bottle and they waved their test strip over it. As you say, the baby-bottle scenario seems odd.
Jan 27, 2013, 10:51 am
#13
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
No clean gloves. Told it wasn't required or necessary because nothing would actually touch the liquids.
Jan 27, 2013, 11:26 am
#14
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
If you choose to depart from there on your return, that's your fault
Jan 27, 2013, 11:28 am
#15
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,490