Community
Wiki Posts
Search

PreCheck "Hack" reached press

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2012, 5:45 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ORD
Programs: AA Platinum, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 1,177
My goodness, this terrible research by internet "reporters" is going to cause everyone to panic for no reason. So what if you can read the bar code. You cannot change the bar code and have it work, because it will no longer match the signature also encoded in the bar code, and you will be rejected.

This is simply the same system used to make sure that the pdf I am reading was not changed by someone. Just because I can read the pdf, does not mean I can change it.

The only "flaw" is that I can know before I go to the airport whether I will get PreCheck or not, which is not really a flaw.
cparekh is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2012, 6:46 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by cparekh
The only "flaw" is that I can know before I go to the airport whether I will get PreCheck or not, which is not really a flaw.
It is a partial flaw.

If I'm an Evil Terrorist, attempting to subvert this system, I and my Evil Terrorist Co-Conspirators might try to establish a deep cover by doing enough air travel to qualify for PreCheck --- knowing that if we do qualify, we can take advantage of the lesser standards for PreCheck screening to smuggle our Evil Contraband through the checkpoint with high probability of success. If I know that I'm not going to get PreCheck, then I and my Evil Terrorist Co-Conspirators will have time to adjust our plans accordingly.

After all, it would be awfully suspicious if I come up to a checkpoint, present my boarding pass, and turn around and leave because I didn't qualify for PreCheck --- even if I'd be allowed to leave at that point. (I'm never quite clear about at what point TSA says I'm not allowed to leave without "completing the screening process".)

Sure, it's a small vulnerability. So is the chance that an aircraft is going to be taken down by a terrorist.
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2012, 12:23 am
  #33  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
After all, it would be awfully suspicious if I come up to a checkpoint, present my boarding pass, and turn around and leave because I didn't qualify for PreCheck --- even if I'd be allowed to leave at that point. (I'm never quite clear about at what point TSA says I'm not allowed to leave without "completing the screening process".)
As I pointed out earlier in the thread, at major hubs, one is turned away from the PreCheck line long before getting to TSA; this is done by an airline-paid contract employee with a scanner. I doubt the contract employee will say anything much less notice or care if you just walk away if you don't get sent to the PreCheck line.
Ari is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2012, 7:23 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,685
Originally Posted by Ari
As I pointed out earlier in the thread, at major hubs, one is turned away from the PreCheck line long before getting to TSA; this is done by an airline-paid contract employee with a scanner. I doubt the contract employee will say anything much less notice or care if you just walk away if you don't get sent to the PreCheck line.
Just go to ATL. When denied for PreCheck by the airport private security, I turn around and go to the other screening checkpoint as the so-called elite line for NoS is just too long, and there's still some WTMD only lanes open on the opposite side. I've yet to have an issue.
Ysitincoach is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2012, 7:37 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by Ari
I doubt the contract employee will say anything much less notice or care if you just walk away if you don't get sent to the PreCheck line.
Unless you get one who wants to try for the Big Catch, just like their brethren in the TSA ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2012, 1:42 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: AA ExPlat, Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,551
so what is the method to see if you'l qualify for pre-check on a Droid? Download a 417 barcode scanner, and then do what?
beofotch is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2012, 2:42 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Programs: AA, UA, Marriott Gold
Posts: 349
Originally Posted by beofotch
so what is the method to see if you'l qualify for pre-check on a Droid? Download a 417 barcode scanner, and then do what?
Scan the barcode on your BP. The last (some airlines 2nd to last) will be a 3 if you qualify.
FearFree is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2012, 1:01 pm
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
So I checked in online for my Delta flight tomorrow from LGA (assuming they have pumped out LGA by then...). I scanned the bar code and the last digit was a 3. Yay!

Question: is the determination of getting into PreCheck static for the entire segment now, or might it change if I print out a boarding pass at the airport tomorrow?
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2012, 3:51 pm
  #39  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
So I checked in online for my Delta flight tomorrow from LGA (assuming they have pumped out LGA by then...). I scanned the bar code and the last digit was a 3. Yay!

Question: is the determination of getting into PreCheck static for the entire segment now, or might it change if I print out a boarding pass at the airport tomorrow?
Reprints should be ok; there was a problem during the summer when they didn't work, but that was very short lived.
Ari is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 10:25 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,690
Question: is the determination of getting into PreCheck static for the entire segment now, or might it change if I print out a boarding pass at the airport tomorrow?
No one here is privy to the internals of the PreCheck so this question is open. If I were designing such a system I would have a randomizer on both the check-in activity as well as at the check in location. I have no working knowledge of how this is actually done.

I doubt if its the best use of time uncovering details on pre-check as these can obviously be changed quickly at any time. I suspect in the near future the so called digit approval will be changed to a simple checksum verification and then the barscan party will be over and these threads will drift into the oblivion of Internet ether...
LaserSailor is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 10:30 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,690
through? Or get a job with an airside vendor and have a 100% chance of getting the gun through?
This is a much, much more serious problem than the scenario above about terrorists using these screening programs to insert a mole....
LaserSailor is offline  
Old Nov 3, 2012, 10:55 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,607
Originally Posted by cparekh
My goodness, this terrible research by internet "reporters" is going to cause everyone to panic for no reason. So what if you can read the bar code. You cannot change the bar code and have it work, because it will no longer match the signature also encoded in the bar code, and you will be rejected.

This is simply the same system used to make sure that the pdf I am reading was not changed by someone. Just because I can read the pdf, does not mean I can change it.
Firstly, what on earth are you talking about? If you can read a pdf you can certainly change it. Just because your crippled pdf reader doesn't let you change it doesn't mean Adobe has some magic hammer that forces everyone else in the world to not write software that allows you to change it. At worst imagine printing it and scanning it back in, doing OCR to generate a new PDF (which would be not unlike what the boarding pass barcodes would be going through). if you distribute your new pdf with a new signature or no signature at all how would the person who receives it know that they should expect there to be a signature?

Secondly, many people have asserted that these barcodes include signatures. But I've never seen any pointer to any evidence of this. Does anyone have any actual information on this purported signature? I'm quite skeptical because there doesn't seem to be enough bits in the barcodes to contain a particularly strong signature. Maybe that's good enough since you can't do offline attacks but I doubt it.

Moreover there's a fundamental weakness in a signature based scheme. The signing key would have to be in every terminal everywhere in the world belonging to every organization that can issue boarding passes. It wouldn't be very long before the key was leaked.

I did just scan a bunch of boarding passes. The US Airways and United boarding passes didn't contain very much of interest at all. The pre-merger Continental boarding pass did contain a 42 byte binary blob which could conceivably have been a signature. But the post-merge United boarding passes don't have the same thing. AC boarding passes appear to have a lot more bits but none of the barcode readers I found can read them.

From http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/stb/Doc...v4_Jun2009.pdf there is a signature field:
5.2.6. Digital signature
The security field is optional and to be used only when required by the local security administration. This field contains a digital signature of variable length, the length of the field and a type of security data (that defines the algorithm used).

The digital signature is part of a public key infrastructure (PKI): the airlines own their private key, used to generate the digital signatures, and distribute their public keys to third parties who need to verify the signatures.
The PKI infrastructure used in the rest of the aviation industry for things like maintenance records and data interchange with airports appears to be ATA "Spec 42" which doesn't appear to be available for free anywhere. It does use IETF RFC 5280 certificates, but I don't see how any of the barcodes I'm looking at could be large enough to contain 5280 certificate.

Last edited by zkzkz; Nov 3, 2012 at 11:55 am
zkzkz is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 8:17 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Getting this (link to article) kind of press will result in a reaction from TSA. Recall that "Speak Your Name" started after the TSA got embarrassed by someone who got through the checkpoint....

I predict that Precheck gets even harder if it doesn't go away.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 11:19 am
  #44  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
Getting this (link to article) kind of press will result in a reaction from TSA. Recall that "Speak Your Name" started after the TSA got embarrassed by someone who got through the checkpoint....

I predict that Precheck gets even harder if it doesn't go away.
Maybe they start mandating signatures on all barcodes, but the article, as usual with media and the TSA, makes plenty of incorrect assumptions.
Ari is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2012, 1:18 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 105
edit: did not realize WP article had been posted already.

Last edited by FatherAbraham; Nov 6, 2012 at 2:04 pm
FatherAbraham is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.