Overseas Security for U.S. bound flights
#16
Join Date: Jul 2007
Programs: QFF
Posts: 5,304
Well, I found out why. At an airport where it has been confirmed over and over to me by various people that shoes do NOT need to be removed as a matter of course, Americans were removing their shoes. Not only that, they were ordering other passengers to do so, even when security told them it wasn't required.
#17
Original Poster




Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Programs: UA 1MM
Posts: 5,613
You guys are absolutely correct about the shoe situation and the mostly U.S. trained flyers following their herd instict. It is therefor that I was so surprised this time that at BKK and at ICN the security staff specifically told us to take shoes, belt and jackets off. I did not expect that at all. Well, off to Spain, let's see what expects me there.
#18




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
At LHR, there was additional random screening of folks entering the gate area for the AA flight to DFW. I was allowed to pass unmolested - I'd guess about 25% of the folks were singled out.
#19
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
One of the benefits of US airline elite status: when flying from Europe to the US, there are reduced chances of getting an additional gate screening of person and/or hand baggage.
At LHR gates for the US-bound flights on AA, it's quite ordinary for those with AA elite status to be allowed to pass unmolested due to the AA elite status.
Last edited by GUWonder; Feb 12, 2012 at 12:39 pm
#20

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, SPG Plat, Marriott Silver, HH Gold
Posts: 797
MUC too
Trip to FCO in Nov, on the way back connected in MUC and went through additional screening just before the gate-- had to put everything through an x-ray.
Also went through the same experience DEL-EWR. It was a frisk to remember.
Also went through the same experience DEL-EWR. It was a frisk to remember.
#21




Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS Titanium, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,583
There's something about the TSA protocol that has the searcher standing behind you and instructing you to spread your legs farther apart that I find rather distasteful and maybe just a leetle too symbolic.
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,214
IAH-NRT-TPE - cleared NRT security during the transfer. No NOS, WTMD only, laptops out and the nicest, friendliest, most helpful security staff in the world...there was just no possible way to get mad at them. No additional screening at the ANA gates to TPE - apparently terrorists *only* attack America 
TPE-NRT-IAH - did the NRT transit check again, same process, although I got held up because I didn't have my connecting boarding passes and I needed to get them from the airline desk, conveniently located PAST security
The staff were tripping over themselves apologizing and asking me to search through my phone to find a confirmation or receipt or anything they could use to let me through...which I was eventually able to locate. They found the glass bottle in my carryon (full of chocolates), which IAH security conveniently missed later on 
There was fairly extensive gate-groping at the departure to IAH, but most people were able to skip it, especially by juggling your position in line as they grabbed other people in front.
Although this hyper-active security nonsense is over-the-top, there is a huge difference in experience and attitude between screeners in Japan or Hong Kong vs your typical TSA screener which makes the experience, although often silly, more tolerable.

TPE-NRT-IAH - did the NRT transit check again, same process, although I got held up because I didn't have my connecting boarding passes and I needed to get them from the airline desk, conveniently located PAST security
The staff were tripping over themselves apologizing and asking me to search through my phone to find a confirmation or receipt or anything they could use to let me through...which I was eventually able to locate. They found the glass bottle in my carryon (full of chocolates), which IAH security conveniently missed later on 
There was fairly extensive gate-groping at the departure to IAH, but most people were able to skip it, especially by juggling your position in line as they grabbed other people in front.
Although this hyper-active security nonsense is over-the-top, there is a huge difference in experience and attitude between screeners in Japan or Hong Kong vs your typical TSA screener which makes the experience, although often silly, more tolerable.
#23




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Painless experience at BCN today for BCN->JFK. Much, much nicer than TSA. Much.
No peep-show machines, no yelling, no gate check for me.
Rhetorical question: why can't the US be like that?
No peep-show machines, no yelling, no gate check for me.
Rhetorical question: why can't the US be like that?
#24



Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 6,095
I find it intriguing whenever I go through the initial security checkpoint at ICN that I am always asked my destination. If I respond with somewhere in the USA, I am made to remove my shoes and am subjected to further searching. If I respond with a destination elsewhere, I get to leave my shoes on. Not once is my BP checked. I still get my water bottles confiscated at the gate, however.
The guy did actually PUT the slippers on my feet, though, which I felt was above and beyond, but what do I know. At MUC, I also had to go through additional screening (all US-bound pax, actually). WTMD, x-rayed bags, and even shoes wanded. At least shoes stayed on!
#25

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
And the flights don't even all leave from that gate area anymore; often they leave from the middle gate area where there are no secondary screening machines.
#26
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 111
A few years ago (in 2005 I think I was) when I was flying from Gatwick to DTW, I remember 3 different types of security stuff. At the check in counter, the usual questions: did you pack own bag, etc. Then the normal security check pre-liquid restrictions etc with no need to take off shoes. Finally, at the gate, there were 2 male & 2 female set up at tables. Males in one line, females in another. Carry-on bags, personal items (purses, coats, etc), shoes removed & checked, and a quick pat down was done before boarding of the plane done quickly & efficiently. I've not had to deal with the last level of security flying internationally the last few times.
#27




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Idaho
Programs: UA:GS; AA: Lifetime PLT; Marriott:Lifetime PLT
Posts: 601
Second dumb rhetorical question. Can someone please tell me why the Asian airports simply cannot figure out the bottled water thing? How hard is it to understand if it comes in from after security to leave it alone. If you are prone to dehydration and are in Y for an TPAC flight, god help you to get enough water from the flight attendants.
#28




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Second dumb rhetorical question. Can someone please tell me why the Asian airports simply cannot figure out the bottled water thing? How hard is it to understand if it comes in from after security to leave it alone. If you are prone to dehydration and are in Y for an TPAC flight, god help you to get enough water from the flight attendants.

