Community
Wiki Posts
Search

NoS vs WTMD decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 10:56 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 627
NoS vs WTMD decision

Here's a question that could be answered by people who frequent airports more often than I do, or even by a resident TS"O":

http://tsastatus.net/search.php?q=TL...r+this+airport!

The two "WTMD only" posts here were me, at 1830 and 1939. This "late" in the day, there are more TS"O"s at the checkpoints than passengers entering at any given time, and the WTMD is being used for what few passengers they have.

Another post from 1400 shows that they are NoS only. Reports from people going to TLH for morning departures, similarly, tell me that they are sending 100% of non-opt-out pax through the NoS during these busier hours.

How do the TS"O"s decide which of the two devices to use? I'd think that they'd use the faster WTMD during busier times, but then again, this _is_ the TSA we're talking about, and long lines aren't really of their concern.

Could it be that they want to maximize NoS use during busy times? Or do some "collective punishment" by making all pax wait longer every time there's an opt-out?
mahohmei is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 11:38 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
It may be as simple as manning. WTMD takes 1 to watch the PAX walk through.

AIT takes a decider on the input side, a director on the output side, an opposite sex person than the director for the resolution pat down if of different sex and possibly someone in the booth, 4 total.

If they do not have enough people, default to WTMD. If they do, AIT for everyone.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 11:50 am
  #3  
Original Poster
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 627
Huh...makes sense now.

Oddly enough, the security checkpoint at the county courthouse is manned by only two deputies running a WTMD and bag X-ray, and even with my belt buckle triggering a HHMD, they still got me through faster than the TSA and without having to touch me.
mahohmei is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2011 | 8:44 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Programs: Ham Sandwich Medallion
Posts: 889
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
It may be as simple as manning. WTMD takes 1 to watch the PAX walk through.

AIT takes a decider on the input side, a director on the output side, an opposite sex person than the director for the resolution pat down if of different sex and possibly someone in the booth, 4 total.

If they do not have enough people, default to WTMD. If they do, AIT for everyone.
Government efficiency at its finest. Pay four people to do the job of one.
T.J. Bender is offline  
Old Dec 15, 2011 | 3:54 am
  #5  
Moderator: Midwest, Las Vegas & Dining Buzz
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 18,092
Originally Posted by T.J. Bender
Government efficiency at its finest. Pay four people to do the job of one.
I'll take the over when it comes to the TSA.
iluv2fly is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 10:47 am
  #6  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 658
I have a question about the staffing. Do machines with ATR take as few staff as WTMDs? My hope is that the addition of ATR software does not make it where the default, when there are few passengers, becomes body scanners instead of metal detectors.
guflyer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.