Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSA remark about Flyertalk in CO/United area @ DTW

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA remark about Flyertalk in CO/United area @ DTW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2011, 10:23 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 739
Yes, TSA at DTW is very aware of FT. I removed my FT luggage tag after
one of them commented about it on the shuttle bus.
dranz is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 10:41 am
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 10,323
Originally Posted by dranz
Yes, TSA at DTW is very aware of FT. I removed my FT luggage tag after one of them commented about it on the shuttle bus.
Awesome!

I wonder what TSA's training programs teach about Saturday Night Live...
RatherBeOnATrain is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 11:32 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by dranz
Yes, TSA at DTW is very aware of FT. I removed my FT luggage tag after
one of them commented about it on the shuttle bus.
Therein lies a difference between you and me. I read comments here about TSA and FlyerTalk tags, so I PM'ed a moderator and got some to proudly adorn both my carry on bags.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 11:41 am
  #19  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
A couple years ago I was told "You don't look like one of those" and did not have a clue what they were referring to. He pointed to the tag and said "one of those troublemakers" or something close to that.

Can't say it ever happened again, but that's probably more because I tuck the tag into the bag when I approach security now and go through undercover.
cordelli is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 11:45 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Programs: AA 2MM - UA 1P / Hyatt Diamond - SPG Plat / Hertz 5* - Avis 1st
Posts: 3,886
Originally Posted by cordelli
A couple years ago I was told "You don't look like one of those" and did not have a clue what they were referring to. He pointed to the tag and said "one of those troublemakers" or something close to that.

Can't say it ever happened again, but that's probably more because I tuck the tag into the bag when I approach security now and go through undercover.
You are a frequent-flying photographer - the epitome of villainy. TSA has their eye on you.
Wilbur is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 11:49 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Miami, Fl, sometimes
Programs: AAEXP, MRPLT
Posts: 126
"Truth is hate speech to the guilty."

-Someone probably said this before, if not, it's mine, all mine!
boatseller is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 11:58 am
  #22  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by dranz
Yes, TSA at DTW is very aware of FT. I removed my FT luggage tag after one of them commented about it on the shuttle bus.
What was the comment? Was the whole airport warned?
Ari is online now  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 1:12 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Originally Posted by miguel0881
Not saying that's right either, but I believe those countries at least invest significantly more resources in training their agents than we do with the TSA.
In countries such as Israel, chatting with the passengers is one very, very small part of a very, very large program. They are not people who got a week of in-class and a week of on the job training. They know exactly who you are before you get to the airport. They knew that my wife speaks Hebrew. They knew that I only spoke what I had learned in Hebrew school. And they knew that I prefer brunettes.

Not surprisingly, I got to keep both my shoes and my water.

Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
Therein lies a difference between you and me. I read comments here about TSA and FlyerTalk tags, so I PM'ed a moderator and got some to proudly adorn both my carry on bags.


I had to pay for mine. Well, the first one, anyway. A mod gave me my second at a Do. Oh, and I've never had a TSO comment on one.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 1:25 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Originally Posted by catocony
So, you would rather be delayed and questioned as to where you live, why you're traveling, where you're going and where you work than take your shoes off? I understand that both choices are bad, it's actually a false choice since the most logical answer is "don't get questioned and don't take shoes off". But having a screener questioning travelers about their business is step way, way over the line.
I get questioned about my business when traveling all the time - in fact, every time I step over an international border.

Either way, I support effective security measures, even if inconvenient (balanced against effectiveness). So, no liquids is silly. But brief questioning of travelers and analyzing behavior has proven quite effective. And it's not like you have to give detailed answers about sensitive information. "Which state do you live in?" and "Do you have your driver's license on you?" is hardly anything I'd worry about divulging.

I mean, we could just eliminate all security entirely and have planes work like trains, but then we'd have a lot more planes crashing into things. So clearly NO security isn't the answer. So if it's going to take me some time to clear security, it might as well be time spent clearing the most effective security possible relative to the time and intrusiveness, and a couple fairly innocuous questions is far more effective than an actual or virtual undressing/groping.
raehl311 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 1:59 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by raehl311
I get questioned about my business when traveling all the time - in fact, every time I step over an international border.

Either way, I support effective security measures, even if inconvenient (balanced against effectiveness). So, no liquids is silly. But brief questioning of travelers and analyzing behavior has proven quite effective. And it's not like you have to give detailed answers about sensitive information. "Which state do you live in?" and "Do you have your driver's license on you?" is hardly anything I'd worry about divulging.

I mean, we could just eliminate all security entirely and have planes work like trains, but then we'd have a lot more planes crashing into things. So clearly NO security isn't the answer. So if it's going to take me some time to clear security, it might as well be time spent clearing the most effective security possible relative to the time and intrusiveness, and a couple fairly innocuous questions is far more effective than an actual or virtual undressing/groping.
International travel I understand. I am asking to be a guest in their country and they have a duty and a responsibility to their citizens to make sure that the guests that they allow in are going to behave.

To answer questions of a personal nature as a requirement for domestic travel is repugnant. If they want to talk trivial matters to judge my reaction, well, I'll play that silly game. If they want to know where I am going (other than destination airport), where I will be working and where I will be staying, they have crossed into an area where they have neither the moral nor legal authority to go, unless it is done with my permission. Using the threat of non-travel to coerce my submission and release of private information to a government actor is against any number of reasonable restrictions upon their authority.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 2:46 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SFO/SJC/SQL
Posts: 1,412
Given the TSA's history of ineffective initiatives, I see the chat downs as more "make work" for an out of control bureaucratic monster. The same people that cannot pass their own audits based on GAO reports are now asked to do the work of highly trained professionals. To compare the security officers Israel uses to a TSO is like comparing apples to pickup trucks. I am fairly certain Israel does not hire off of pizza boxes and gas pumps. Their officers are recruited among the best and smartest and often from those that served with military intelligence. Rather than come up with new window dressing, the TSA needs to fix what is broken first.
WChou is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 6:21 pm
  #27  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The TSA can't even effectively prevent all contraband weapons, explosives and incendiary devices from getting airside, so those TSA actors really ought not to pretend that the voodoo "security" of interrogating passengers is an effective use of resources in the US.

With waste like this, no wonder the government can't even break even on its financials.

Originally Posted by FlyingNone
Why be confused (hopefully not intimidated)......really, WHO actually likes the TSA ?....I love the part that they were "warned".....
They (the TSA) need to look no further than any media outlet (newspaper articles, TV reports about them, etc.)....and then they likewise should hvave been "warned" about people posting in any and all these other websites/forums.
Were "they" (the TSA) warned about the US Congress too?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 6:31 pm
  #28  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I got my FT tags a decade ago and have never had a comment about them from any TSA screeners in the course of flying well over a million miles. I expect that to change but not because of any kind of effective security screening approach.

Originally Posted by raehl311
But brief questioning of travelers and analyzing behavior has proven quite effective.
It's really been proven to be quite effective? The TSA wanted-and-approved interrogators failed to prevent the attempted shoe bomber clown from boarding the AA flight where he smoked his shoes. The TSA wanted-and-approved interrogators failed to prevent the attempted underwear bomber clown from boarding the DL flight where he singed his thing. And those are just the psychopathic sociopaths who pulled something off on US airlines in the past ten years despite being questioned by "professionals". Then there are the sociopaths who were questioned by "professionals" and traveled repeatedly into and out of the US and then ended up arrested for attempted crimes after completing travel.

It seems very ineffective because it is.

Let the TSA actually perform far more reliably with WEI interdiction and then I'll reconsider allowing the TSA to engage in these clownish questioning games at US airports.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 6:32 pm
  #29  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BOS/ORH
Programs: AS 75K
Posts: 18,323
Originally Posted by miguel0881
For instance, the passenger in front of me handed the agent her boarding pass and US passport, and the agent started asking her questions about where she lived. The passenger advised that she lived in Michigan, and the agent asked her if she had her Michigan driver's license with her. The passenger stated that she did not. The agent then started inquiring as to the passenger's employer, and the passenger stated the name of her employer. The agent then asked if she was travelling with an employee ID. The passenger stated that she was, and the agent smugly replied, "Let me see that." The entire scene left me very unsettled, and when I asked an agent about it, he advised that it was a new two-week old "pilot" program. Upon further research, it looks like it's called the Behavior Detection Pilot program. I'm not sure what they're up to in DTW, but it was enough to convince me that I don't want to pass through there again. Fortunately, as a UA and AA flyer, it's unlikely that I will.
So they get kicked out of BOS and move BDO to DTW? I got crap for using my Passport as my ID in September. Its sad that I had easier time getting back into the US after a MR with a 6 hour stop in LHR then to get through the BDO's questions

BTW I had my MP tag on instead. I did receive comments on my crew tag though
CDKing is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2011, 6:55 pm
  #30  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
When I see the TSA BDOs trying to do their thing, I make sure to get on my phone (or at least the connected earpiece) connect to an office voicemail number and just say uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh or something like that. If they then were to try to interrupt me, I would probably say that their effort to distract me is not appreciated.
GUWonder is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.