Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Riding The Rails

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2011 | 4:21 pm
  #16  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,655
Amtrak's actual ID checking policy revolves around your ticket number. A random number is chosen at the beginning of each train trip, and if the last digit of your ticket number matches that, the conductor is supposed to check your ID.

The conductor who usually works my morning train says apologetically "It's like a strange lottery with no prize"... He doesn't like doing it.
SNA_Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2011 | 4:26 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 118
Originally Posted by SNA_Flyer
Amtrak's actual ID checking policy revolves around your ticket number. A random number is chosen at the beginning of each train trip, and if the last digit of your ticket number matches that, the conductor is supposed to check your ID.

The conductor who usually works my morning train says apologetically "It's like a strange lottery with no prize"... He doesn't like doing it.
The one time I rode the San Joaquin line, the conductor asked EVERY passenger for ID. And he hassled quite unapologetically anyone who could not produce one (although I don't think he went so far as to kick them off of the train). He even had to gall to try to make small talk about his brother living in the same town that I do.

On the other hand, I have never been asked for ID on the Coast Starlight.
Bungnoid is offline  
Old Oct 25, 2011 | 9:27 pm
  #18  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
Seems kinda tricky. There are three or four places on the train a passenger could be. Lounge, cafe, dining car, seat, room if sleeping car. It is one thing to know where the passenger is supposed to ride. It is another thing to actually find them there. But maybe that varies by the route.
LuvAirFrance is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 6:50 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
Originally Posted by SNA_Flyer
Amtrak's actual ID checking policy revolves around your ticket number. A random number is chosen at the beginning of each train trip, and if the last digit of your ticket number matches that, the conductor is supposed to check your ID.

The conductor who usually works my morning train says apologetically "It's like a strange lottery with no prize"... He doesn't like doing it.
Bolding mine: This doesn't surprise me. It is probably a DHS requirement, you know, "ID is important! (so that we're not made to look like idiots when a person with 11 fake IDs gets past us)"
DeafBlonde is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 5:28 pm
  #20  
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: DL DM, Hyatt Globalist, Amtrak peon, Colbert Lifetime Platinum, Walk Score 100
Posts: 4,553
Originally Posted by Bungnoid
He even had to gall to try to make small talk about his brother living in the same town that I do.
It's been a while since I've been asked for ID on Amtrak, but discretion does go a long way in my book. Starting a conversation or making a public remark based on any of my personal data on the ID is definitely a turn-off. Back in 2005, boarding the northbound Silver Meteor in Jacksonville, the conductor collecting tickets in the station looked at my California ID and loudly exclaimed, "California! Well, you're sure a long way from home!" I'm sorry, any innocent intentions aside, my home location is no one's business. I can put it out there on my FT profile, but such public disclosure is my prerogative, not that of anyone else.
GoAmtrak is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 5:34 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: DL Diamond, HH Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 555
Originally Posted by LuvAirFrance
Not to engage in schadenfreude, but on my Amtrak trip, the closest we got to TSA is the brown uniforms in Havre MT asking those in the lounge car "Are you American?" When they left the car, there were a few jokes. "What if I answered, 'Yes, infidel', or 'Just visiting, eh'" Of course any of that would be like saying "bomb" or "hijack" in an airport. Given where Havre is, no one wants to be put off a train there.
You should respond with "Si Senor". All CBP officers need to know how to speak spanish. So if the officer complains, just say you're brushing up on your spanish skills
Janus is offline  
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 11:21 pm
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
Originally Posted by GoAmtrak
It's been a while since I've been asked for ID on Amtrak, but discretion does go a long way in my book. Starting a conversation or making a public remark based on any of my personal data on the ID is definitely a turn-off. Back in 2005, boarding the northbound Silver Meteor in Jacksonville, the conductor collecting tickets in the station looked at my California ID and loudly exclaimed, "California! Well, you're sure a long way from home!" I'm sorry, any innocent intentions aside, my home location is no one's business. I can put it out there on my FT profile, but such public disclosure is my prerogative, not that of anyone else.
I'd say "thanks a lot for sharing it with all these strangers. Now I won't have to strike up conversations with everybody in the car so I can tell them where I'm from". Then give him a look that says "Idiot!"
LuvAirFrance is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2011 | 12:42 pm
  #23  
Used to be Sydneysider
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
Originally Posted by Xyzzy
In that case, the conductor is suppsed to ask for ID on the train when the ticket is presented. They hardly ever do, though. Either way, the "check" is a waste of time and effort.
I'm on the Maple Leaf right now and wasn't asked for any ID. I don't recall if I've been asked before - maybe on a NEC trip DC to NYP.

But what I'd really like to know is how Amtrak can justify this? They claim to be a private company, and so what authority do they have to demand my ID? Other private companies could never get away with that.
Savvy Traveler is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2011 | 1:25 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: *wood Gold
Posts: 1,780
Originally Posted by Sydneysider
But what I'd really like to know is how Amtrak can justify this? They claim to be a private company, and so what authority do they have to demand my ID? Other private companies could never get away with that.
Actually, I think it would be easier for private companies to get away with this than the government. After all, the only thing our Bill of Rights applies to is government (and really mostly toward Federal at that, unless you look at something the the Tenth Amendment). (Notwithstanding that privacy isn't a right...)

Private companies can place whatever restrictions and requirements they wish upon people in a business relationship. If you don't like it, you're free to conduct business with someone else. (Subject, of course, to market forces making such choices imprudent for them.)
clrankin is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2011 | 3:10 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 156
Amtrak is only a private company in organization, it's owned by the government and funded by the government. If it was truly private, then first amendment issues would be moot because as was pointed out, there IS no first amendment with private entities. Otherwise, the outrage about Amtrak arresting the photographer, and the ACLU getting them to change their photographic policy wouldn't have worked. Greyhound prohibits taking pictures, but you don't see the ACLU suing them over it.
TheOneTheOnly is offline  
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 1:41 pm
  #26  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,670
Originally Posted by TheOneTheOnly
Otherwise, the outrage about Amtrak arresting the photographer, and the ACLU getting them to change their photographic policy wouldn't have worked.
I wan't aware that Amtrak changed their photo policy; I'm under the impression that they always allowed photography and the Amtrak Police just didn't know their own employer's rules and made an arrest.

Originally Posted by TheOneTheOnly
Greyhound prohibits taking pictures, but you don't see the ACLU suing them over it.
Obscenity if not protected under the First Amendment.
Ari is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.