White House Proposes Raising TSA fee for funding
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,763
White House Proposes Raising TSA fee for funding
#2
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 761
Fees should never be used to close budget gaps. They should be used to help pay for security. Apparently the TSA is sucking too much money from the budget paying for a lot of fancy machines that never once stopped a terrorist.
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I would rather that the TSA cut costs rather than receive additional funds from any source. Too much waste on the TSA already.
Eliminate the TSA ID/boarding pass checks and the TSA interrogations of passengers, and there's some easy money to save .... unless the TSA is meant to remain an expensive workfare workfarce as it is.
#4
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 1 AU
Programs: Support the Tyrants Travel Club
Posts: 2,708
There is already one other thread about this very topic. Perhaps someone can post a link to it and then get them merged.
I would rather that the TSA cut costs rather than receive additional funds from any source. Too much waste on the TSA already.
Eliminate the TSA ID/boarding pass checks and the TSA interrogations of passengers, and there's some easy money to save .... unless the TSA is meant to remain an expensive workfare workfarce as it is.
I would rather that the TSA cut costs rather than receive additional funds from any source. Too much waste on the TSA already.
Eliminate the TSA ID/boarding pass checks and the TSA interrogations of passengers, and there's some easy money to save .... unless the TSA is meant to remain an expensive workfare workfarce as it is.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,426
#6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Programs: SSSSS
Posts: 867
I propose anchors. Boat anchors. They will help keep boats from drifting and make ports and harbors safer.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,426
#8
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 118
They would be useful as a legitimate alternative in any situation in which a physical strip search would be legally permitted. Perhaps they should be donated to prisons.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 5,735
No general fund tax dollars for TSA. Should be 100% funded by fees.
And the fees should not be included in the ticket price.
Set up a kiosk forcing every passenger to buy a stamp to put on their ticket prior to going through the checkpoint.
Hit up a family of 4 travelling for the holidays with a $40 (or whatever it is -- I think it would be $20 today with current rates) security checkpoint tax/fee and watch the complaints start rolling in!
Oh, and allow airports to select their own screening providers. Think transparency and competition would drive higher levels of customer server at lower prices?
And the fees should not be included in the ticket price.
Set up a kiosk forcing every passenger to buy a stamp to put on their ticket prior to going through the checkpoint.
Hit up a family of 4 travelling for the holidays with a $40 (or whatever it is -- I think it would be $20 today with current rates) security checkpoint tax/fee and watch the complaints start rolling in!
Oh, and allow airports to select their own screening providers. Think transparency and competition would drive higher levels of customer server at lower prices?