![]() |
My response to any BDO attempts will be:
1. "Go SPOT someone else" 2. Incoherent gibberish. I won't talk to any one in a TSA uniform unless absolutely forced. I want nothing to do with the US version of the Gestapo. As it is now, I only fly when forced. My last trips from NC to NJ have been by car, and I will continue to do so. If Pistole/Nappy think this will make things better, then they need to submit for their regularly scheduled drug test. |
Originally Posted by cottonmather0
(Post 16820565)
The purpose of this new announcement is that now they can use a "bad attitude" to justify being hard on people who don't just roll over and acquiesce and justify it as part of "enhanced security procedures" or whatever. It was always informal and kind of scandalous when they retaliated against people who didn't roll over, now they're setting themselves up to be able to retaliate openly and hide behind procedure.
Things aren't always as they seem. This isn't an attempt to make things more efficient, this is just a vehicle to get even more control and less pushback at checkpoints from people like us who are vocal about hating this nonsense. I initially tried to play along, but it doesn't seem to "get me out" of the WBI at all, in fact ever. So, as long as I'm not getting any benefit I'm not going to participate. Next time I'm just going to look puzzled at the guy or be engrossed in my blackberry. The irony is, I think that extended interviews, or even "CBP-style interviews" could divide people into low risk and higher risk. It would, however, take very trained agents, and clearly violate discrimination laws and even our constitution. I don't want this kind of effort in the freedom-loving (at least supposedly freedom-loving) U.S.A. This half-a$$ed implementation is absolute nonsense and simple retaliation for non-conformity. |
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 16821444)
Exactly right. It is already going on at BOS for those of you who fly out of there frequently. EVERY time (3x in past 2 wks) I have had a mini-"interview" by the BDO asking me where I'm coming from, and then been selected for cancer box (however, 75%+ of ppl are selected for cancer.)
I initially tried to play along, but it doesn't seem to "get me out" of the WBI at all, in fact ever. So, as long as I'm not getting any benefit I'm not going to participate. Next time I'm just going to look puzzled at the guy or be engrossed in my blackberry. The irony is, I think that extended interviews, or even "CBP-style interviews" could divide people into low risk and higher risk. It would, however, take very trained agents, and clearly violate discrimination laws and even our constitution. I don't want this kind of effort in the freedom-loving (at least supposedly freedom-loving) U.S.A. This half-a$$ed implementation is absolute nonsense and simple retaliation for non-conformity. |
Originally Posted by Mats
(Post 16820818)
The questions in Europe have been the same for decades. It's the same set of five to ten question before check in at European and South American airports if one is flying on US carrier. There is then a second, smaller set of questions at the gate.
Then there are the additional, random, often bizarre questions. One is asked these before one can even check in for a US carrier, US bound flight (at LHR, MUC and FRA for example the questioner is before the check in area for UA). Then one may be asked additional questions before entering the gate area. (I was asked those exactly once, at MUC) The questions as some have stated are asked by airline employees or security contractors. They are sometimes truly bizarre. What does annoy me is that the ones at MUC and FRA often do not speak German, and only speak heavily accented English. That is just useless is doing much at all to act as a deterrent or to scope out possible troublemakers. I tell them every single time that they should ask me in German, and sometimes they give up. I also cannot understand some of the American accents or terminology even at this point in my life and thus cannot answer some of the questions. But I wouldn't think that this mandated, European model in use for some flights is what is being discussed here. And I still question if like 'pronounce your name' and 'spell your name' the TSA is prepared to handle those passengers who do not speak English. |
If a BDO could tell instantly when somebody was lying, he would have better professions to enter:
http://www.allvegaspoker.com/ It CAN NOT be done with any sort of accuracy. The questions are going to be a huge annoyance. Ask me if I'm coming back from vacation while wearing a suit and tie and I WILL get annoyed. A great deal of people would, because it shows you are just stupid. We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys. |
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 16821738)
If a BDO could tell instantly when somebody was lying, he would have better professions to enter:
http://www.allvegaspoker.com/ It CAN NOT be done with any sort of accuracy. The questions are going to be a huge annoyance. Ask me if I'm coming back from vacation while wearing a suit and tie and I WILL get annoyed. A great deal of people would, because it shows you are just stupid. We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys. Looks like another massive taxpayer boondoggle coming down the road. Huge taxpayers dollars will be spent on training folks who aren't qualified in the first place. I suspect only a small percentage of my own workforce would be qualifed to do this sort of interrogation effectively - and we're going to waste time and money telling folks who can't master the website list of '10 allowable IDs' to become ace BDOs. Right. This from an agency that can't even control the barking and braying. Airports around the world can teach their security personnel how to communicate without barking and braying, but after almost ten years, TSA still hasn't mastered that one. Right. |
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 16821738)
We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, <SNIP>
Everyone (passengers, airline employees, TSA employees) should be subject to the same screening. X-ray of belongings, hand held / walk through metal detectors, and Explosive Trace Detection / Explosive Trace Portal.
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 16821738)
and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys.
|
Originally Posted by VH-RMD
(Post 16818159)
BDO "how are you today?"
PAX 'Oh good, porter service. Carry these over there will you?'
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
(Post 16819146)
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 16818029)
And risk goalie-mom's all reaching and all powerful backhand slap upside my head for not being polite? I learned to fear that many moons ago ;)
|
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 16821897)
Looks like another massive taxpayer boondoggle coming down the road. Huge taxpayers dollars will be spent on training folks who aren't qualified in the first place. I suspect only a small percentage of my own workforce would be qualifed to do this sort of interrogation effectively - and we're going to waste time and money telling folks who can't master the website list of '10 allowable IDs' to become ace BDOs.
To me the only way out of some of this mess it have another program take it over. Such a program might be useful not just at airports but any large gathering of people. For instance, FAM though part of TSA is on the law enforcement side. As such they have higher standard for training and employment. If left as part of the security screening program then forget it no matter how well trained. |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 16822470)
I move that goalie-mom and RadioMom co-run the TSA's BDO problem :D. Do I have a second?
|
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 16822470)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_rhTQQtcMO_...pit%2Btake.jpg
I move that goalie-mom and RadioMom co-run the TSA's BDO problem :D. Do I have a second? A motion has been made and seconded. All in favor? |
Originally Posted by mikemey
(Post 16822796)
Seconded.
A motion has been made and seconded. All in favor? |
A few questions:
1) What kind of training will the new BDOs get? How will it compare to the training that their "equivalents" in Israel get? 2) In Israel, I did not have to remove shoes or liquids. Would that be carried over, as well? 3) What controls will be in place to make sure that there are no retaliatory screenings for those who do not work and play nicely with others?
Originally Posted by Mats
(Post 16820818)
The staff at Tel Aviv are for more interactive. Although the questions have been the same for years, they tend to work in teams, and have a far more conversational approach.
Originally Posted by cardiomd
(Post 16821738)
We need a trusted traveler program, body scanning for secondary ONLY with opt-out option, and a massive downsizing of the TSA with focus on intelligence and organized threat detection. Nothing else, no more toys.
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 16822470)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_rhTQQtcMO_...pit%2Btake.jpg
I move that goalie-mom and RadioMom co-run the TSA's BDO problem :D. Do I have a second? Mike |
About 99% of the time, when I am in line, I have noise-cancelling headphones on and am listening to music. I remove them just before I get to the TDC. I never actually did this to avoid TSA, but rather the incessant prattle of people yammering on their cell phones. If I can't hear them, how can they interrogate me, at least when I am in line? So far, they have never asked me to take them off as there is usually someone lonely or friendly enough to actually chat up the BDOs and keep them busy.
I am curious how this will be handled. Or will I be deemed suspicious for having headphones on in the first place? What if I am on a cell phone, having a conversation, will they make me hang up the phone to talk to them? |
Originally Posted by Wollstonecraft
(Post 16824195)
About 99% of the time, when I am in line, I have noise-cancelling headphones on and am listening to music.
<> I am curious how this will be handled. Or will I be deemed suspicious for having headphones on in the first place? What if I am on a cell phone, having a conversation, will they make me hang up the phone to talk to them? But there is nothing that compels anyone to speak to a TSA employee. I limit exchanges to things such as identifying my bag if asked when it comes out of the x-ray when they want to do a secondary. Topics beyond that, such as where I'm flying to, are met with silence, and I do want them to know I can hear them just fine. ;) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:29 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.