Community
Wiki Posts
Search

it's a go!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 8:39 pm
  #31  
Original Poster
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
My main problem with these removals from flights, going all the way back to the first day flights were restarted after 9/11, and the first half-dozen or so people were removed from planes, is mainly that any member of the crew or public can just declare that they are "uncomfortable" with you on the flight and you are gone - no civilized debate, no way to prove that they have no reason to feel uncomfortable -nothing! Sayonara, scary brown person.

My second problem is with the general public, who overwhelmingly either take the position that the people removed are a threat on airplanes and applaud any removal of said people, or at the consider the removal of a few people here and there an indication that real, effective security is in place.

My third problem is the stigma that the person removed from a flight has to bear when everyone around them knows what happened.

I really do wish that the captain of the ship from where a passenger is removed for reasons of race or religion be legally liable for their actions.
PhlyingRPh is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 1:34 am
  #32  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,725
Originally Posted by PhlyingRPh
I really do wish that the captain of the ship from where a passenger is removed for reasons of race or religion be legally liable for their actions.
Is the captain a FFDO? Then it becomes a federal crime, to wit 18 USC 242.
n4zhg is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 7:35 am
  #33  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,980
Interview this morning on local TV, lady (victim) was seated on next flight and was given a voucher for a future flight.

Seems very inadequate to me. Think I would have consulted an attorney before accepting any compensation.

The only way to stop things like this is to force airlines to operate in an unbiased manner and I don't think a voucher will be create enough pain for the airline to reconsider its actions.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 9:40 am
  #34  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, M&M*G, HH Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,917
Just another punishment for the non-crime of FWV (flying while veiled).
stifle is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2011 | 10:04 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 449
She's suing Southwest.

http://www.boston.com/business/artic...us_plane_sues/

A Muslim-American woman who was removed from a plane in San Diego last spring sued Southwest Airlines on Thursday, alleging she was discriminated against because she was wearing an Islamic head covering.

Irum Abbasi, a psychology graduate student at San Jose State University who is a U.S. citizen, filed the lawsuit in federal court in San Diego.

"Suspicions were aroused because of her religion," Abbasi's attorney, James McElroy, said at a news conference. "She would not have been removed from the plane if she had been a blond-haired, blue-eyed woman."
Ellie M is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2011 | 10:07 pm
  #36  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,205
Originally Posted by Ellie M
Good for her!! I hope she collects a large award.
bocastephen is online now  
Old Oct 6, 2011 | 11:34 pm
  #37  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,677
On the one hand, I believe the lawsuit has merit and the actions of the crew were based on her appearance. On the other hand, it does seem like Southwest handled it "in good faith" when it happened by giving her an apology and a voucher.

I think what really has to happen is to have the pilot and the crew held accountable. The initial concern that caused her removal seems meritless enough; once she was cleared to fly, the crew's alleged refusal to allow her to reboard seems very hard to justify.

If Southwest is just going to write a big check, this suit will acomplish nothing. This has to be a teaching moment for airline crews so this type of thing isn't constantly repeated.
Ari is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 10:20 am
  #38  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 29,078
Originally Posted by bocastephen
Good for her!! I hope she collects a large award.
Agreed! ^
goalie is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 10:36 am
  #39  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Originally Posted by PhlyingRPh
So WN issues a faux apology and throws a few bucks worth of travel vouchers at the customer. Hopefully the student in question decides to do the right thing and sue WN, force the FA and captain of the ship to be publicly named and obtain an extremely large settlement.

More here
"We accommodated her on the next flight to San Jose, and we issued her a travel voucher as a gesture of goodwill for her inconvenience,'' the statement continues. "We are attempting to follow up with the customer directly to apologize again for her inconvenience."
No problem -- One person's injustice is another person's inconvenience. It's all a matter of interpretation....

I am always amazed at the audacity of companies (not just airlines) who commit an atrocity or other injustice on a customer and then placate them with some sort of merchandise voucher. They must actually believe that the individual will actually continue to but their product or service! Or, they might believe that there is very little financial risk to giving her a voucher because of the low probability of it being used.

The only way to even begin to make amends to the woman is for WN to terminate the FA and to make sure she never agains darkens the door of any commercial aircraft as an employee.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 1:15 pm
  #40  
Moderator: American AAdvantage
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT EXP; HH LT Diamond, Matre-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
And, here's another: An African-American middle-aged man who was reading an illustrated book on aviation, removed from the flight after a FA on this United flight saw the book. Oh my gosh, security issues!

Uh, well, if any U S airline is operating 1946 Polish aircraft, or 1921 Italian aircraft. (Thanks to The Economist for the tip - blog description by "perpetrator" reading vintage aviation books.

Policeman: "Sir, were you looking at a book of airplanes?"

Me: "Yes sir I was. I am a musician for money, but for fun I study old aircraft and build models of them, and the book I was reading was of Polish Aircraft from 1946." The flight was diverted from the runway back to the gate, where LEO and TSA met the flight...

"Policeman: "Would you please go get that book so that i can see it?"

I go back onto the plane - all eyes are on me like I was a common criminal. Total humiliation part 2.

After a couple of minutes he says, "Why, this is all Snoopy Red Baron stuff..."

Me: "Yes sir, actually the triplane you see is Italian, from 1921 a little after World War 1..."

Oh, brother, now I have to worry about taking my aviation mags and books with me?

Policeman: "No problem here then, you can go on back on to the plane, sorry to inconvenience you...and have a nice flight".


.
JDiver is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 3:24 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by JDiver
And, here's another: An African-American middle-aged man who was reading an illustrated book on aviation, removed from the flight after a FA on this United flight saw the book. Oh my gosh, security issues!
Already under discussion in this thread:
Don't read books about airplanes while on an airplane.
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 5:51 pm
  #42  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Programs: UA 1MM
Posts: 5,613
I am really surprised how many of usually reasonable posters make it a point to condemn WN and the F/A for their action. Does no one remember, why all of us are in this horrible security situation in the U.S? Who caused all of this? Which group of people did this to us?
No need to flame me, but I feel targeted by TSA because I am old and walk with a cane, Mrs. EX is targeted TSA/CBP because she is Asian as are our kids, mother in law is targeted by TSA because she wears a medical device after fighting cancer, then certainly other people should be targeted as well especially if there is a good reason, and be without recourse just like me. On the ground and in the air.
Exleftseat is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 6:29 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: United
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by PhlyingRPh
CAIR... Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-San Diego)...CAIR-San Diego...CAIR-San Diego...CAIR San Diego...cair...CAIR San Diego...CAIR
Get back to me when this is being spearheaded by a non-terrorist group.





http://www.redstate.com/jeffdunetz/2...errorist-ties/
Combat Medic is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 6:39 pm
  #44  
3M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN
Programs: COdbaUA MM, AA EXP, AF G, Bonbon Gold, Hilton G, All G, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis Presidential
Posts: 5,929
Absolutely disgusting behavior, and something that has become far too prevalent. At some point, the FAA needs to step in and start fining carriers heavily for such incidents. While private enforcement is a great remedy, there needs to be some regulatory action here.

Originally Posted by srirams
This, and the incident a couple of days ago with the Jewish prayer.... Anything different seems to set off alarm bells It's not like the terrorists try to blend in or anything
Interestingly, two groups often at odds, religious Moslems and Orthodox Jews, are largely the victims in these incidents. Honestly, this should inspire some cooperation and understanding.

Originally Posted by N965VJ
Incidents like this are something that Kate Hanni over at FlyersRights.org should be talking about. @:-)
Yep

Originally Posted by Combat Medic
Get back to me when this is being spearheaded by a non-terrorist group.





http://www.redstate.com/jeffdunetz/2...errorist-ties/
Get back to us when you can find a little better source.
N1120A is offline  
Old Oct 7, 2011 | 7:00 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 247
Originally Posted by Cartoon Peril
What's next, internment camps? I guess we won't need this poem any more:
as reported in the new yesterday, a kill commision formed to make a list of to be killed, without a jury trial
DIFIN is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.