Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSO saying "heads up, got a cutie for you"

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSO saying "heads up, got a cutie for you"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2010, 9:29 pm
  #46  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Okay, I'm curious. No TSO is going to select a fat, middle-aged schlub like me to gawk at. However, my wife is still quite attractive, looking way younger than she is and possessed of a very nice body, if I do say so myself (I've never won the lottery, but I've been lucky in other ways). If she's selected for the NOS, she'll refuse and, presumably, be subjected to a grope. If so, I'm going to demand that I be present, not as her husband, but as her lawyer. My clients don't get questioned or searched by government agents unless I'm present.

It will be interesting to see what happens.
PTravel is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2010, 9:33 pm
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by PTravel
If she's selected for the NOS, she'll refuse and, presumably, be subjected to a grope. If so, I'm going to demand that I be present, not as her husband, but as her lawyer. My clients don't get questioned or searched by government agents unless I'm present.

It will be interesting to see what happens.
Interesting indeed. A lot of opt-outers report being surrounded by absurd numbers of TSOs in an apparent attempt at intimidation. Interesting to see what happens when you turn the tables and announce that their target has legal counsel standing right there. Hopefully with a working camera-phone.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2010, 9:37 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Originally Posted by BearX220
Interesting indeed. A lot of opt-outers report being surrounded by absurd numbers of TSOs in an apparent attempt at intimidation. Interesting to see what happens when you turn the tables and announce that their target has legal counsel standing right there. Hopefully with a working camera-phone.

Be careful of the state your in and its wire-tapping laws, but i think PT has the bases more then covered.
Scubatooth is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2010, 9:41 pm
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
Be careful of the state your in and its wire-tapping laws, but i think PT has the bases more then covered.
IANAL, but he sure is.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2010, 10:11 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Programs: United, JetBlue, Delta, Amerian Airlines
Posts: 1
Unhappy me, too.

Sometime about a year ago I was flying out of Denver, before I knew what the new scanners were doing. The TSO kind of smirked at me and said "you have to go in here now" which I thought was odd because I thought it was a metal detector, and I always go through them. They scanned me three or four times, saying they saw something odd on my back, but there wasn't anything odd on my back. I offered to raise the back of my shirt so they could look at my bra strap. (I was wearing a bra with a double strap in the back, which I guess may have looked odd... maybe.) Then the officers said "no no, you don't have to do that, you can go now."

I'm 30, and I'm not hourglass-figure-hot but I am thin and athletic. I remember complaining to someone in the airport that the whole experience had seemed fishy, but I didn't think about it again until I found out months later what the scanners were doing.

I'm pretty dismayed that they abused my trust... I would have assumed they'd at least tell me what's happening before violating my religion. And I'm also pretty creeped out. Now I opt for the pat-down, even though it takes longer. =(
karob is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2010, 10:53 pm
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by karob
They scanned me three or four times, saying they saw something odd on my back, but there wasn't anything odd on my back... I remember complaining to someone in the airport that the whole experience had seemed fishy, but I didn't think about it again until I found out months later what the scanners were doing.
Please consider filing a formal complaint, even with the delay. I would consider the possibility that you were being used for prurient amusement purposes. Welcome to Flyertalk; I wish you were joining under happier circumstances.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2010, 11:11 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: AA 1MM
Posts: 3,182
Originally Posted by makfan
Not to get too personal, but as a gay man, I get no thrill out of having a male TSO grope me. It's just a disgusting situation.
Have you considered making them aware of this when the pat-down begins . I mean, after all, isn't transparent information the most important thing?

"You'll have to excuse me, I'm a homosexual, and as everyone knows, homosexual males desire sex with every other male they encounter, so should I involuntarily become aroused, you have my appologies in advance."

See how carefully you are patted down then .
JumboD is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 12:35 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,110
Originally Posted by BearX220
[B]
PLEASE ask your captain to publicize this every way he can while protecting his daughter's identity. (snip) PLEASE resist at checkpoints, even if it means flight cancellations... activist flight crews are a key point of leverage for us in this battle. If enough of you resist the system grinds to a halt. Remember that TSA has chosen to go to war with you and your customers. PLEASE do not submit to government-sanctioned sexual assault as a job requirement... and PLEASE tell your captain friend how many passengers sympathize with him, and stand with him and his daughter.
+1
KSinNYC is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 12:41 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
Not all of them are, but they are all in the clear others are on a reversal codec but that is easy to correct and you can look up the freq online. I always have my radio with me(digital recorder plugged in as well) and i have a 3x5 card with the frequencies on it so i can see what clerks are upto and saying.
For a decent frequency list try (great site btw):
TSA RADIO FREQUENCY LIST
You can also look up specific airports with mixed success...here for example is the frequency plan for PHX:
172.15000 TSA-1 Transportation Security Administration - Security Checkpoint P25 Federal
172.90000 TSA-2 Transportation Security Administration - Security Checkpoint P25 Federal
169.30000 TSA-3 Transportation Security Administration - Security Checkpoint P25 Federal
Scuba, can you comment on your experience carrying your radio? I have always avoided mine partially due to size reasons and partially out of not wanting to deal with what I feel is the inevitable stupidity. Might be interesting to see what I can pick up next time I am waiting for someone in the cell phone lot. ^

Originally Posted by JumboD
"You'll have to excuse me, I'm a homosexual, and as everyone knows, homosexual males desire sex with every other male they encounter, so should I involuntarily become aroused, you have my appologies in advance."
Thats my general response the couple times I previously got SSSS'ed. It will continue if I encounter this silly new patdown. A relatively loud 'oh look I get a cutie' seems to do a lot expedite the patdowns...it may help that I am not the least bit attractive.
avsfan733 is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 3:18 am
  #55  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Programs: Formally TPAbound/Delta Diamond 1MM/Hilton Diamond/Marriott Silver/Priority Club Gold
Posts: 270
Karob you described my experience to the tee

Karob, What you described was basically what happened to me last Tues, Nov 9th in TPA.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, a woman just has this feeling when a situation is becoming perverted. The body language, the smirk (not smile) and personal enjoyment of a VERY uncomfortable event.

As I read the posts here and google this topic, it's obvious woman and children are consistently targeted. The accounts are overwhelming.

Hopefully, together we can get our rights back.
babe11 is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 7:09 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE, SPG Gold, HH D
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by babe11
As I read the posts here and google this topic, it's obvious woman and children are consistently targeted. The accounts are overwhelming.
Well, we ARE supposed to be more docile and accepting of harassment than you big, strong menfolk
phedre is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 7:31 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
Be careful of the state your in and its wire-tapping laws, but i think PT has the bases more then covered.
This should definitely not fall under wiretapping. Either way, I'd love to see TSA push this angle. For TSA to put forth an argument that they have an expectation of privacy---in a public area where you are virtually stripped searched (using imagers and cameras) and under constant surveillance (more cameras)---is beyond ludicrous.

In the case mentioned, the lawyer of the person being groped should insist that he has the right to be present and record the government searching his client. TSA would disagree (of course). I would love to see this get ugly, go to trial, and get as much publicity as possible.
ScatterX is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 8:51 am
  #58  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by ScatterX
For TSA to put forth an argument that they have an expectation of privacy---in a public area where you are virtually stripped searched (using imagers and cameras) and under constant surveillance (more cameras)---is beyond ludicrous.
NSA has successfully suppressed most details of its own programs and operations while asserting rights to scrutinize email, phone calls, and financial transactions of everyday Americans. TSA will take a cue from them.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 10:47 am
  #59  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Originally Posted by avsfan733
Scuba, can you comment on your experience carrying your radio? I have always avoided mine partially due to size reasons and partially out of not wanting to deal with what I feel is the inevitable stupidity. Might be interesting to see what I can pick up next time I am waiting for someone in the cell phone lot.
The radios I use when i travel are handheld that at most put out 5w of power, there small and compact and travel well and can be broken down with the antennas removed very easily. there nothing like the ones(Yes plural) i have in the car or at home that have much more power and better reception.

I have a more powerful radio that travels in a pelican 1510 case(including battery for power(~24hrs) but all sorts of problems would occur if i started to put up a portable buddy pole in a terminal. Heck the looks from walking around with a pigtail in my ear are bad enough, let alone wearing a throat mic set up.


Give me till the end of the day or tomorrow and i will post a list of channels/Frequencies that i can dig up. As my cards are not with me there in my go kit that is currently a 20+ hour drive from me (its a 3 hour flight, but not a chance in he double hockey sticks im flying now).


Originally Posted by avsfan733
Thats my general response the couple times I previously got SSSS'ed. It will continue if I encounter this silly new patdown. A relatively loud 'oh look I get a cutie' seems to do a lot expedite the patdowns...it may help that I am not the least bit attractive.
Oh that would be a great situation to film. I bet the reaction on the clerks face would be priceless.
Scubatooth is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010, 10:50 am
  #60  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Absolutely disgusting behavior and I hope that it can be proven but you know the TSA . Now, I wonder if the radio calls made by TSO's are recorded as they are with leo's & fire departments.
goalie is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.