Security Aggravations at LHR
#1
Original Poster


Join Date: May 2001
Location: RNO, NV, USA.
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 5,393
Security Aggravations at LHR
I went to the UA checkin counter today at LHR T1 for a flight to the USA, but before you can reach the counter there is a security officer checking your passport and apparently your story. He asked me how long I'd stayed in London and I said one day. This it seems flags you as a potential terrorist in the U.K. I had arrived from BUD the previous day and decided to overnight in London. This explanation did not seem to satisfy the officer who demanded I produce proof of my hotel stays in BUD. His supervisor came over and agreed. I have never been asked to produce proof of prior hotel stays before. I said I had email print outs of my hotel stays in BUD, but they were at the bottom of my luggage and I would need to empty my bag to access these records. The officer then insisted I do this, which mean spreading all my clothes and travel purchases out on the floor in front of the UA check in area. After I did this and showed him my hotel confirmations for the previous few days, he seems content, and I was allowed to proceed to the UA check in desk.
I imagine these ubiquitous and aggravating security agents are paid by the airport or the U.K. government, rather than UA. I think they are out of control. No wonder taxes are so high for U.K. airports. What Heathrow needs is more staff manning the luggage X-ray posts, and fewer standing around demanding proof of my prior hotel stays. When I went through flight connections T1->T3 a week and a half ago, there was a 3/4 hour wait for luggage screening at Flight Connections, due to inadequate staffing at 8 am.
I really think, for UA pax, it is better to transit through FRA and avoid LHR, and I plan to do this.
I imagine these ubiquitous and aggravating security agents are paid by the airport or the U.K. government, rather than UA. I think they are out of control. No wonder taxes are so high for U.K. airports. What Heathrow needs is more staff manning the luggage X-ray posts, and fewer standing around demanding proof of my prior hotel stays. When I went through flight connections T1->T3 a week and a half ago, there was a 3/4 hour wait for luggage screening at Flight Connections, due to inadequate staffing at 8 am.
I really think, for UA pax, it is better to transit through FRA and avoid LHR, and I plan to do this.
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
My sincere apologies for the passionate nature of my response, but I am none none too fond of the greedy, corrupt, filthy, racist and religiously bigoted pigs who are ICTS, and your experience reminded me of my own battle against these diseased tosspots.
The type of thing you describe has been standard practice for at least the last 20 years for ICTS. Your experience is certainly not out of the ordinary, especially if you do not fit the demographic this company is most comfortable with. And BTW, these filthy ICTS pigs are paid for by the airlines, and therefore by you and I, not the UK government.
Actually, what really causes a melt down for them is something that I routinely do, and pay the price for... Namely, boarding a flight in the Middle East or South Asia, arriving at LGW or LHR, going home to have breakfast, a shower, saying hello to parents, etc, then returning to the airport a few hours later for my flight home to the US. Upon returning to the airport, it is necessary to have a LHR/LGW issued BP to get through the security checkpoint. When ICTS realize that you have left the airport (they see an onward boarding pass issued in KHI or DXB or wherever), they tend to freak out. I've been accused by these greedy, disgusting creatures of being a terrorist, of testing the system and illegally leaving the airside portion of the airport by going to my own home IN MY OWN COUNTRY for three hours!
Of course, if you know the history of ICTS, it's ownership, the corruption, the incompetence, it's links to international state terror and it's links to individuals that have gotten away with spying on the US, you will learn exactly what sort of filth you are dealing with and why this company and it's scum leadership needs to be eliminated by any means necessary. These are nasty, nasty people.
The type of thing you describe has been standard practice for at least the last 20 years for ICTS. Your experience is certainly not out of the ordinary, especially if you do not fit the demographic this company is most comfortable with. And BTW, these filthy ICTS pigs are paid for by the airlines, and therefore by you and I, not the UK government.
Actually, what really causes a melt down for them is something that I routinely do, and pay the price for... Namely, boarding a flight in the Middle East or South Asia, arriving at LGW or LHR, going home to have breakfast, a shower, saying hello to parents, etc, then returning to the airport a few hours later for my flight home to the US. Upon returning to the airport, it is necessary to have a LHR/LGW issued BP to get through the security checkpoint. When ICTS realize that you have left the airport (they see an onward boarding pass issued in KHI or DXB or wherever), they tend to freak out. I've been accused by these greedy, disgusting creatures of being a terrorist, of testing the system and illegally leaving the airside portion of the airport by going to my own home IN MY OWN COUNTRY for three hours!
Of course, if you know the history of ICTS, it's ownership, the corruption, the incompetence, it's links to international state terror and it's links to individuals that have gotten away with spying on the US, you will learn exactly what sort of filth you are dealing with and why this company and it's scum leadership needs to be eliminated by any means necessary. These are nasty, nasty people.
Last edited by PhlyingRPh; Sep 26, 2010 at 1:35 am
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London and Zurich
Programs: AA, BA, Mucci: Sir Roger des Directions Routires, PCR
Posts: 13,609
It's an airline thing and has nothing to do with perceived high taxes.
It seems UA is your problem. Have you discussed it with them?
It seems UA is your problem. Have you discussed it with them?
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
I went to the UA checkin counter today at LHR T1 for a flight to the USA, but before you can reach the counter there is a security officer checking your passport and apparently your story. He asked me how long I'd stayed in London and I said one day. This it seems flags you as a potential terrorist in the U.K. I had arrived from BUD the previous day and decided to overnight in London. This explanation did not seem to satisfy the officer who demanded I produce proof of my hotel stays in BUD. His supervisor came over and agreed. I have never been asked to produce proof of prior hotel stays before. I said I had email print outs of my hotel stays in BUD, but they were at the bottom of my luggage and I would need to empty my bag to access these records. The officer then insisted I do this, which mean spreading all my clothes and travel purchases out on the floor in front of the UA check in area. After I did this and showed him my hotel confirmations for the previous few days, he seems content, and I was allowed to proceed to the UA check in desk.
I imagine these ubiquitous and aggravating security agents are paid by the airport or the U.K. government, rather than UA. I think they are out of control. No wonder taxes are so high for U.K. airports. What Heathrow needs is more staff manning the luggage X-ray posts, and fewer standing around demanding proof of my prior hotel stays. When I went through flight connections T1->T3 a week and a half ago, there was a 3/4 hour wait for luggage screening at Flight Connections, due to inadequate staffing at 8 am.
I really think, for UA pax, it is better to transit through FRA and avoid LHR, and I plan to do this.
I imagine these ubiquitous and aggravating security agents are paid by the airport or the U.K. government, rather than UA. I think they are out of control. No wonder taxes are so high for U.K. airports. What Heathrow needs is more staff manning the luggage X-ray posts, and fewer standing around demanding proof of my prior hotel stays. When I went through flight connections T1->T3 a week and a half ago, there was a 3/4 hour wait for luggage screening at Flight Connections, due to inadequate staffing at 8 am.
I really think, for UA pax, it is better to transit through FRA and avoid LHR, and I plan to do this.
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 47,182
Has anyone ever ignored one these dingbats or told them to pi$$ off or it's none of their business? What is the repercussion, and who is the escalation point - the airline GSC?
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 19,258
Hi,
On UK airlines lights at least ( BA/VS) there is no person asking questions prior to check in. ( On BA the first person to ask for your passport will be the check in agent)
At the gate there will be a couple of contractors for the airline checking your passport and occasionally asking a question ie how long will you be in the us.
The US airlines check prior to check in is more visibly obvious.
Regards
TBS
On UK airlines lights at least ( BA/VS) there is no person asking questions prior to check in. ( On BA the first person to ask for your passport will be the check in agent)
At the gate there will be a couple of contractors for the airline checking your passport and occasionally asking a question ie how long will you be in the us.
The US airlines check prior to check in is more visibly obvious.
Regards
TBS
#8
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 62
Having flown US from LGW this summer, i can assure you that this goes on elsewhere too....
at LGW they have staff with portable machines to scan your passport, make sure you have an esta/visa/green card etc., ask the ins and outs of your travel plans and then put a little sticker on your passport to show you have been 'security scanned' before you can reach check in
at LGW they have staff with portable machines to scan your passport, make sure you have an esta/visa/green card etc., ask the ins and outs of your travel plans and then put a little sticker on your passport to show you have been 'security scanned' before you can reach check in
#9

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
From FRA to US I have have an 'extra' checker prior to check in ensuring that everyone had the correct visa etc.
#11
Original Poster


Join Date: May 2001
Location: RNO, NV, USA.
Programs: UA 2MM
Posts: 5,393
A very good question. I suspect the answer is no, because they put a "Security ICTS" sticker on the back of my passport. I assume in some strange way, it is important to have this sticker in order to leave the U.K. BTW does someone know what "ICTS" stands for?
#12
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FLL - Nice and Warm
Programs: TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,025
#13
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: GS UA+3MM
Posts: 265
#14




Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,301
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 22,650
Last time I flew out of LHR, I was able to OLCI, and could have bypassed the counter, but I had to check a bag..
I am looking at doing a quick turn to LHR, leaving the US on Friday, spending Saturday night in London, and returning to the US on Sunday. I wonder if I will be considered a potential terrorist..
I would be interested in the results of ignoring these guys, and demanding to see the UA GSC.. Perhaps for a pax such as a GS or 1K, they might be able to help..
I am looking at doing a quick turn to LHR, leaving the US on Friday, spending Saturday night in London, and returning to the US on Sunday. I wonder if I will be considered a potential terrorist..
I would be interested in the results of ignoring these guys, and demanding to see the UA GSC.. Perhaps for a pax such as a GS or 1K, they might be able to help..



