![]() |
Adding Authorized Users to Aged Accounts (5/24?)
In "The Before Times" (i.e. before I started aggressively playing the points and miles game) whenever either my spouse or I got a new credit card we generally always added the other as an authorized user on the account. We share our finances, etc. so this just kept things pretty simple. Once we got serious about points and miles and transitioned to "2 player mode" we generally stopped doing that as keeping 5/24 "slots open" become paramount in my mind. Though occasionally annoying it certainly has worked to our advantage, overall.
However, in the interest of having flexibility with our transferable currencies, and which FFP we need to transfer them too, I've been thinking about getting authorized user cards for each of us on one anothers accounts, specifically for Amex, since that is the only transferable currency we have that does not allow sharing/transferring/combining. We also have some core, long term holding cards (e.g. Chase Sapphire Preserve, WoH, etc.) where having authorized user cards would simplify some things in our day to day life. So, this brings me to a more general question regarding how adding authorized users to "aged accounts" (i.e. accounts that are greater than 24 months old, in some case much older) appears to, specifically, Chase in terms of 5/24, but even to other banks that have variations of these type of rules, etc. For example, I have a Capital One Venture X card that will be over 24 months old come January 2024. I would be interested to add my spouse as an authorized at that point if it did not impact her from a 5/24 perspective (I do realize that one can call Chase to explain authorized users when applying for a card, but prefer to avoid that step where possible). Another example, we both have very long term Amex cards (e.g. 7-8 yrs old), where we could add each other as authorized users, thus facilitating MR transfers to an FFP from either of our "pools" of MR points. So again, the question is would the authorized user "inherit" the account open date of the primary user and thus evade a 5/24 hit or would it be seen as a new account? I did attempt some research/searching before creating this thread. I found some threads that were from 2016, but much of the discussion was around an authorized user trying to improve their credit score by getting added to an older account. That is not what we are trying to do in this case. Apologies, this got a bit more wordy than I intended. In my mind it's clear, but sort of complex writing it out, but the general question is really "Does adding an authorized user to a card that has been open for greater than 24 months, impact the authorized users 5/24 count or not?" And if not, would be interesting to compile a list of confirmed banks where this is true (particular interested in the main four, Chase, Amex, Citi, Capital One) I probably have three long term "keeper" cards that I'd add my wife as an authorized to if it did NOT impact her 5/24 situation, but obviously if it does then I likely would not. Any insight or direct experience is greatly appreciated. Regards |
Much of what you want to know is in this post: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/33937048-post176.html Read the Quoted paragraphs in adition to the new content.
|
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 35391818)
Much of what you want to know is in this post: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/33937048-post176.html Read the Quoted paragraphs in adition to the new content.
Originally Posted by RNE
(Post 33937048)
RNE, trusting that is as clear as mud. ;)
My review of the post you quoted, leads me to believe (I think? :confused:):
Regards P.S. To any reading this, really not interested in debating the term "backdating" This isn't a difficult question to frame up (though seems difficult to authoritatively answer): If an individual opens an AU card on a primary account greater than 24 months old, would Chase count that AU card in their 5/24 "tally" when considering their application for a new Chase card? (The answer may differ based on the issuing bank and thus why the discussion of "backdating" comes into play) |
Originally Posted by scubadu
(Post 35393844)
|
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 35393868)
The linked post by RNE reports that the AU account shows the same opening date as the primary card.
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/35393846-post5.html Unfortunately I added my AU cards on the same date that I opened the card, so I can't confirm or deny 😌. |
Originally Posted by scubadu
(Post 35393844)
My review of the post you quoted, leads me to believe (I think? :confused:):
So let's try a couple of clarifying questions:
|
Originally Posted by Boraxo
(Post 35497746)
Last year I added myself as an AU on my P2's Marriott card as I was being given some issues with using her card at stores while trying to take advantage of a promo. They never even asked for a SSN, so no way for that to show on a credit report. We try and always have 1 Chase card with transfer partners at any given time, but its not always the same one. Ink Preferred lets you transfer to a co-business owner, so thats the preferred method over adding an AU |
Originally Posted by Schnit
(Post 35498936)
....never even asked for a SSN, so no way for that to show on a credit report.
See here: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/capi...ir-credit.html Plus here: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/33934190-post736.html and this post also confirms that Capital One reports the date that the original account was opened, not the date that the AU card was issued. |
Originally Posted by mia
(Post 35498982)
This is inaccurate. Capital One does not request SSN's for AU cards, but they do report them to credit bureaus.
See here: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/capi...ir-credit.html Also here: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/33934190-post736.html and this post also confirms that Capital One reports the date that the original account was opened, not the date that the AU card was issued. How could Capital One confidently report something like that? If you have a common name like John Smith, I would imagine they would have trouble ensuring its the same one |
Just checked Experian app - my report shows Amex and BofA AU accounts - both specifically marked "Authorized User". So this should not be so hard for Chase to figure out, but I gather maybe that is beyond the capabilities of the 5/24 software that processes apps. Amex reports "date opened" as the date the AU card was received, not the original account open date.
|
Originally Posted by Boraxo
(Post 35499904)
....report shows Amex and BofA AU accounts - both specifically marked "Authorized User". So this should not be so hard for Chase to figure out, but I gather maybe that is beyond the capabilities of the 5/24 software .
|
I think it should be noted that while it is possible to point out accounts as AU on recon for a 5/24 denial, having that work to bypass is a YMMV situation. Probably works most of the time but I've attempted before and been told to pound sand.
As such AU accounts that backdate are much preferred. My only DPs confirm Chase does use original account opening and AmEx uses date of AU added. |
I’ve been wondering about this for years! So glad to get some data points.
I’d like to see when my son’s Cap1 AU card was dated but he’s not yet 18 so he can’t create accounts for the freebie credit apps. Or at least they won’t report the cc as far as I know. How else to check his credit report? |
Originally Posted by Stgermainparis
(Post 35501360)
. How else to check his credit report?
It seems to be a two-step process. Checking to see if a report exists, then requesting a copy. |
Originally Posted by CaptJOB (Post # 12)
(Post 35500218)
Chase does use original account opening and AmEx uses date of AU added.
The issuance of a separate account number would seem to be the determinative factor in reporting when that account was opened. :idea: |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.