|
Originally Posted by fallinasleep
(Post 31903319)
Sadly for Dan Wells, Emirates already has 10 across on their 777s.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...5d781b5f93.jpg |
Originally Posted by Visconti
(Post 31902548)
Ah, that looks pretty brutal. Next time, Dude should just pay for an upgrade to at least PE or something.
|
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 31903291)
I agree. As much as I also don't line the 10-abreast seats, the issue here is policy, not seat width. Even with 9-abreast seats, the same problem could have happened. I think asking for an employer who will pay for a higher class is totally besides the point.
Until then let the Air Rage and Occupy cases continue. |
|
i dont have much sympathy i am sorry. you knew well along CX sardine 10abrest yet you still went with it so....
be like some of us. i moved beyond CX, next summer family trip is on AY and thanks to my Emerald i get the front row econony comfort for.free there everyone complains avout cx 10abrest yet those still fly it... |
Originally Posted by fakecd
(Post 31906490)
i dont have much sympathy i am sorry. you knew well along CX sardine 10abrest yet you still went with it so...
- forced on you by suppliers setting a new low in service - best avoided by active management - sometimes unavoidable when you're trying to fly on Christmas Day (my next 787) (I treat all non-JL 787 the same as 777 10-abreast) |
Flew B-HNW yesterday in Y. Noticed that row 42ABC have a lot more legroom than other rows. Even 42DEFG have narrower legroom as the lady seating there have her knees against the back of the seat in front. While I still can fit my fist loosely between my knees and the seat in front. I’m 5’10”, and the lady is definitely shorter than me.
|
Originally Posted by boybi
(Post 31913135)
Even 42DEFG have narrower legroom as the lady seating there have her knees against the back of the seat in front.
|
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 31913147)
Isn't that the extra row 53DEFG https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...l#post30136901 ?
|
Originally Posted by boybi
(Post 31913165)
No. We are in the front Y cabin.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...56ec1f9c66.png |
So that’s why. Didn’t notice the row 53 in the seat diagram at first. So all middle seats have narrow legrooms!?
|
Originally Posted by boybi
(Post 31913192)
So that’s why. Didn’t notice the row 53 in the seat diagram at first. So all middle seats have narrow legrooms!?
|
"Discrimination To Plus Size Passenger On Air"
These problems are coming thick and fast in winter holiday travel period.
In the comments I pointed out to Owen he met both legs of AA's Person Of Size policy (post #246 above) - he should consider buying a second seat even if CX didn't make him. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...e395187336.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...feea487624.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...d9dbdc4399.jpg |
Hi, I'll be on a 77P to NRT (no PEY)
https://www.aerolopa.com/cx-77p Would the toilet being in front of 39ABC be a problem? Would have preferred 40K>40A but both taken, leaving the next best window (apart from 39A) 41A/K? Thank you! https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...d6ce481d7c.jpg |
You have the galley and toilet not far. Ans possibly an infant in 39F G.
But that should be far enough not to bother you much.. Maybe 42A/K is a bit quieter. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:12 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.