Community
Wiki Posts
Search

74A Seating Question (66 & 67)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 3:52 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: United Premier 1K, Starwood Gold, Marriott Gold, Avis Presidential Club.
Posts: 94
74A Seating Question (66 & 67)

Hey guys,

I will be traveling from SFO to HKG in November on a CX 74A (economy). seatguru.com reports that seats on row 66 and 67 (near the rear of the plane) are excellent seats due to the space found on the sides/front resulting from the curvature of the plane. I've tentatively booked 66A for my trip, and was wondering if anybody had any recent experience with these seats.

Thanks,

- Supratik
Supratik is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 4:11 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
I had a window seat assignment in one of those rows in a 744 before, but never had that in a 74A. I expect the difference is small.

The window seats are fine with extra room. The aisle seats are not, as there are often people standing next to you waiting for the lavs. Personally I prefer an aisle seat in the front Y section to 66-68A/K.
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 4:39 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: United Premier 1K, Starwood Gold, Marriott Gold, Avis Presidential Club.
Posts: 94
Hi,

When you say "Y section", what do you mean? Which rows are defined by the Y section?

Thanks.

P.S. For your reference, here's the seatguru link:
http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Cat..._747-400_B.php
Supratik is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 5:33 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
"Y section" means econonomy (coach) class. (J section means business, F means first).
christep is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 11:30 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Programs: Asia Miles, AAdvantage, Kris Flyer, Delta Skymiles,
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by Supratik
Hey guys,

I will be traveling from SFO to HKG in November on a CX 74A (economy). seatguru.com reports that seats on row 66 and 67 (near the rear of the plane) are excellent seats due to the space found on the sides/front resulting from the curvature of the plane. I've tentatively booked 66A for my trip, and was wondering if anybody had any recent experience with these seats.

Thanks,

- Supratik
I joined this thread to get this question anwsered. I am flying near the end of this month on a 74a and booked the same seats ( which i later cancelled and rebooked at a lower price but lost the seats )
Basically what i received is that front = less noise , less turbulence easier to get served (for each section)
----
middle = Stable , possiblly loud wings block view
----
Last : the end 2 seat rows are nice and provide some legroom. Somepeople dont prefer this because of the turbulence and that you cant sleep angaints the cabin wall etc.
----

I will try to find the response I got and post it here.


Im flying CX 879 and can't wait.
btw It took me a whole day to figure out this Y class thing etc so yeah its ok
dudeofswim is offline  
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 1:03 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 349
Originally Posted by dudeofswim
I joined this thread to get this question anwsered. I am flying near the end of this month on a 74a and booked the same seats ( which i later cancelled and rebooked at a lower price but lost the seats )
Basically what i received is that front = less noise , less turbulence easier to get served (for each section)
----
middle = Stable , possiblly loud wings block view
----
Last : the end 2 seat rows are nice and provide some legroom. Somepeople dont prefer this because of the turbulence and that you cant sleep angaints the cabin wall etc.
----

I will try to find the response I got and post it here.


Im flying CX 879 and can't wait.
btw It took me a whole day to figure out this Y class thing etc so yeah its ok
Is it true that , Front of the plane , there is minor turbulence.

Middle i agree that its stable.

The back has turbulence always (through my experience)
sealalula is offline  
Old Jul 16, 2009 | 9:02 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Programs: Asia Miles, AAdvantage, Kris Flyer, Delta Skymiles,
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by sealalula
Is it true that , Front of the plane , there is minor turbulence.

Middle i agree that its stable.

The back has turbulence always (through my experience)
I have a response , I will PM it to you as this member that im reffering to has deleted his/her account.
Summary
1. Row 66
2somes storage
Con:
busy . loud. cant sleep agianst wall. turbulence.
light etc.

I cant vouch for it but the busy and loud parts may not be sooo bad.
dudeofswim is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 12:20 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LAX
Posts: 435
Originally Posted by sealalula
Is it true that , Front of the plane , there is minor turbulence.

Middle i agree that its stable.

The back has turbulence always (through my experience)
Well....the whole plane has the same turbulence. However, the rear feels it more do to movement around the center of gravity and the distance to the back. Middle will be most stable do to relatively small arm of movement.
dkul is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 7:39 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 349
Originally Posted by dkul
Well....the whole plane has the same turbulence. However, the rear feels it more do to movement around the center of gravity and the distance to the back. Middle will be most stable do to relatively small arm of movement.
Like a see-saw ?
sealalula is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 10:17 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LAX
Posts: 435
Originally Posted by sealalula
Like a see-saw ?
^

Yes...basically....except the plane moves around 3 axis and the see-saw only in one.
dkul is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.