HND-HKG J (& to Macau), JL vs CX?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,385
HND-HKG J (& to Macau), JL vs CX?
same price for J, both legs can be on either airline.
HND-HKG would be morning departure (9/10am)
HKG-TYO, could be morning departure (9/10am) or redeye (1am), unsure
same:
lounge access is same at HND-HKG, or HKG-HND
both are reverse herringbone seat (CX 330 vs JL 787) - two people traveling together
different:
Flying JL from HND-HKG allows early checkin but not CX
Flying CX from HKG-HND allows early checkin but not JL
food:
JL would have japanese +western meal
CX would have cantonese meal + japanese?
soft product?
HND-HKG would be morning departure (9/10am)
HKG-TYO, could be morning departure (9/10am) or redeye (1am), unsure
same:
lounge access is same at HND-HKG, or HKG-HND
both are reverse herringbone seat (CX 330 vs JL 787) - two people traveling together
different:
Flying JL from HND-HKG allows early checkin but not CX
Flying CX from HKG-HND allows early checkin but not JL
food:
JL would have japanese +western meal
CX would have cantonese meal + japanese?
soft product?
Last edited by paperwastage; Mar 26, 2024 at 7:09 am
#3
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: The "Ew-K"
Programs: BA Gold, ALL Gold
Posts: 97
In my limited experience (I've only flown with JL about 5 times in the past year, 2 of them international), I found JL's proficiency of English to be not of good standard, which IMO is unacceptable on international flights (on domestic I understand). Don't get me wrong - they mean well and are kind, and always deliver that true Japanese hospitality, but it can be difficult if you need to chat or speak to them.
Other than that I don't think you can go wrong with either.
I guess it depends if checking in early important to you?
Other than that I don't think you can go wrong with either.
I guess it depends if checking in early important to you?
#4
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: HKG
Programs: CX Gold, HX FWC
Posts: 42
Hard product-wise (IFE, seat...) I think CX is a lot better than JL. Their reverse herringbone seat is a lot wider than the APEX suites/JL's own reverse herringbone seats. Lots more content on the IFE as well.
For food JL takes the lead by quite a lot(at least on the ex-HND flight, not sure about the ex-HKG one). Service-wise, I think JL's hospitality is commendable, though CX's service is also pretty good. You'll also most likely run into some language barriers on JL, while that wouldn't be the case on CX
JL doesn't have a morning flight to HND (JL26 leaves at 3pm, CX548 is the only morning flight to HND which is operated by a 77W). I don't think there are any red eyes opby JL/CX to HND, the ones showing up on CX's website are UO flights which codeshare w/ CX
For food JL takes the lead by quite a lot(at least on the ex-HND flight, not sure about the ex-HKG one). Service-wise, I think JL's hospitality is commendable, though CX's service is also pretty good. You'll also most likely run into some language barriers on JL, while that wouldn't be the case on CX
JL doesn't have a morning flight to HND (JL26 leaves at 3pm, CX548 is the only morning flight to HND which is operated by a 77W). I don't think there are any red eyes opby JL/CX to HND, the ones showing up on CX's website are UO flights which codeshare w/ CX
#5
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,805
Last edited by percysmith; Mar 25, 2024 at 10:50 pm
#6
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: HKG
Programs: CX Gold, HX FWC
Posts: 42
[QUOTE=percysmith;36110193]
It's the feeling of the seats -- on the apex high walls surround you and you feel like sleeping in a coffin, whereas for CX you have sufficient shoulder room which makes it a lot better. Sometimes the numbers don't tell the truth
Plus the reverse herringbone seats aren't built for the 787, they're quite narrow due to the width of the cabin
Hard product-wise (IFE, seat...) I think CX is a lot better than JL. Their reverse herringbone seat is a lot wider than the APEX suites/QUOTE]
Sure? They're both 20-20.5":
https://www.aerolopa.com/cx-77k
https://www.aerolopa.com/jl-773-w84
Sure? They're both 20-20.5":
https://www.aerolopa.com/cx-77k
https://www.aerolopa.com/jl-773-w84
Plus the reverse herringbone seats aren't built for the 787, they're quite narrow due to the width of the cabin
#7
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Penang, Malaysia
Programs: BAEC Silver, ALL Gold
Posts: 112
JL J Japanese style food ex-Japan rivals or even beats CX F food, but the IFE is terrible and Sky Suite III herringbones are probably the worst J seats in the region. I personally love Apex Suites though.
#8
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Hilton Honors Gold, Marriott Gold, BA Silver, Hertz President's Club
Posts: 486
The question should be what matters to you the most? Preference is subjective; I’ve flown both and both are great airlines. Is booking one each way an option? (Presumably not)
#9
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 565
Hong Kong to Japan is what I'd called a pseudo redeye not a proper redeye.
You leave very late, arrive early and lose an hour en route due to the time difference. Factor in the noise of announcements etc. before takeoff and landing and you'd be very lucky to get more than three and a half hours of kip. So if sleep is important, I'd avoid the overnight flights on this route..
You leave very late, arrive early and lose an hour en route due to the time difference. Factor in the noise of announcements etc. before takeoff and landing and you'd be very lucky to get more than three and a half hours of kip. So if sleep is important, I'd avoid the overnight flights on this route..
#10
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Cathay Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 691
Hong Kong to Japan is what I'd called a pseudo redeye not a proper redeye.
You leave very late, arrive early and lose an hour en route due to the time difference. Factor in the noise of announcements etc. before takeoff and landing and you'd be very lucky to get more than three and a half hours of kip. So if sleep is important, I'd avoid the overnight flights on this route..
You leave very late, arrive early and lose an hour en route due to the time difference. Factor in the noise of announcements etc. before takeoff and landing and you'd be very lucky to get more than three and a half hours of kip. So if sleep is important, I'd avoid the overnight flights on this route..
From HK most flights are earylish daytime..
If from US of course different.
#11
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HKG/HND/OOL
Programs: QF Emerald. SQ Gold.
Posts: 3,171
do note some 777 CX flight (cx542/543 pair that leaves hk 4pm and.leave tokyo.morning) is often operated by 2-3-2 J seats. i booked A330 and just got changed to this dog sh** ship for June, saving grace work pays not me. on other side i am paying my own J on Jal this easter weekend
i would say seat itself (if u get Cirrus CX J) are better than JL. IFE is also miles better on CX.
Servivce and.food is miles better on JL. but afterall its 4hr flight. if i was on cx548/549 with almost guranteed longhaul J seat i would swey to CX only because i eat at F lounge anyways.
i would say seat itself (if u get Cirrus CX J) are better than JL. IFE is also miles better on CX.
Servivce and.food is miles better on JL. but afterall its 4hr flight. if i was on cx548/549 with almost guranteed longhaul J seat i would swey to CX only because i eat at F lounge anyways.
#12
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 565
#13
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,385
Just trying to check if one airline has something that the other airline doesn't (eg JL has bidet, CX doesn?), or any special benefit if continuing to macau from hkg airport
Hard product-wise (IFE, seat...) I think CX is a lot better than JL. Their reverse herringbone seat is a lot wider than the APEX suites/JL's own reverse herringbone seats. Lots more content on the IFE as well.
I don't think there are any red eyes opby JL/CX to HND, the ones showing up on CX's website are UO flights which codeshare w/ CX
I don't think there are any red eyes opby JL/CX to HND, the ones showing up on CX's website are UO flights which codeshare w/ CX
I'll have to check with the passengers, what timing they want on the HKG-Tokyo flight
do note some 777 CX flight (cx542/543 pair that leaves hk 4pm and.leave tokyo.morning) is often operated by 2-3-2 J seats. i
Servivce and.food is miles better on JL. but afterall its 4hr flight. if i was on cx548/549 with almost guranteed longhaul J seat i would swey to CX only because i eat at F lounge anyways.
Servivce and.food is miles better on JL. but afterall its 4hr flight. if i was on cx548/549 with almost guranteed longhaul J seat i would swey to CX only because i eat at F lounge anyways.
Thanks for the 777 info. Looking at Sept, planes can swap. Looking at random date in April, looks like JL may also operate similar angled flat (no direct airsle) seat 787-8 on this route instead of lie flat 787-9
Last edited by paperwastage; Mar 26, 2024 at 7:31 am
#14
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,805
How much Japanese do you need? I got status with them with only four words - three that are wrong, as was pointed out to me:
How fast can you learn Japanese ?!
How fast can you learn Japanese ?!
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,385
How much Japanese do you need? I got status with them with only four words - three that are wrong, as was pointed out to me:
How fast can you learn Japanese ?!
How fast can you learn Japanese ?!