Overflying Russia, what happens in an emergency landing?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2022
Programs: QRPC, BAEC
Posts: 683
Overflying Russia, what happens in an emergency landing?
God forbids this happens but given that overlying Eastern Russia is now the norm for JFK-HKG, what happens supposedly when there is an emergency over Russia….with a plane full of US citizens ?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
#2
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 726
God forbids this happens but given that overlying Eastern Russia is now the norm for JFK-HKG, what happens supposedly when there is an emergency over Russia….with a plane full of US citizens ?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
A medical emergency ? The Captain has to take into account the wellbeing and safety of all other passengers so they may take a longer time to divert even if there are closer alternatives within Russia.
That being said, I doubt Russia would really do anything bad to a planeload of US passengers. I also think Russia would treat any issues with the Chinese carriers + Cathay much better than any western airline (ie I could just see "paperwork" delays being a reason to hold a British Airways plane if they still flew over Russia and needed to divert!)
#3
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zurich / Europe / New York
Programs: LH, BA, AA
Posts: 1,312
God forbids this happens but given that overlying Eastern Russia is now the norm for JFK-HKG, what happens supposedly when there is an emergency over Russia….with a plane full of US citizens ?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
#5
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Cathay Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 691
With the Russian airlines often overflying countries where there aircraft would be unwelcome but not badly treated if they needed to land due to an emergency it is unlikely in my view that aircraft (and its civilian passengers) needing to land in Russia in a dire emergence would not come to much harm. Also of course the routing taken by Cathay ex New York when headwinds are too strong to use the pacific route is only necessary for a short period in the year and the routing crosses the far eastern part of Russia, a long way from the conflict zone in the west. The most northerly alternate would be Astana in Kazakhstan a rather more welcoming country . Using this polar route at certain times of the year is commercially necessary as it eliminates the possibility of having to make a technical stop for a change of aircrew due to flight time limits. It seems that United are unwilling to use this necessary routing out of JFK to HKG at this time of year and have thus not yet restarted there flights. Will they ?
#6
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SMF / SFO
Posts: 226
With the Russian airlines often overflying countries where there aircraft would be unwelcome but not badly treated if they needed to land due to an emergency it is unlikely in my view that aircraft (and its civilian passengers) needing to land in Russia in a dire emergence would not come to much harm. Also of course the routing taken by Cathay ex New York when headwinds are too strong to use the pacific route is only necessary for a short period in the year and the routing crosses the far eastern part of Russia, a long way from the conflict zone in the west. The most northerly alternate would be Astana in Kazakhstan a rather more welcoming country . Using this polar route at certain times of the year is commercially necessary as it eliminates the possibility of having to make a technical stop for a change of aircrew due to flight time limits. It seems that United are unwilling to use this necessary routing out of JFK to HKG at this time of year and have thus not yet restarted their flights. Will they ?
#8
formerly Sleepy_Sentry
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 614
God forbids this happens but given that overlying Eastern Russia is now the norm for JFK-HKG, what happens supposedly when there is an emergency over Russia….with a plane full of US citizens ?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
Diversion to the nearest airport in Russia? Or would the CX protocol be to continue flying until the nearest diversion airport in Mongolia/China?
That being said Russia would be likely to treat a Cathay plane well. You can bet they would check the flight manifest thoroughly, however, and would almost certainly arrest any high-profile dissidents on board.
I personally would be fine taking the risk but would rather not support an airline paying flyover fees to Russia.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Cathay Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 691
S-S I am not at all sure that I would be comfortable overflying Russia at this time ether but of course it seems that somewhere close to half of the worlds major airlines ae paying overflying rights .
Is not EWR not still in New York though cpdc ?
Is not EWR not still in New York though cpdc ?
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2022
Programs: QRPC, BAEC
Posts: 683
#13
formerly Sleepy_Sentry
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 614
Obviously this isn’t always possible for everyone in every situation. I just can’t imagine telling someone who lost a loved one in Ukraine (Russian or Ukrainian), suffered torture, lost their home, etc. that I chose to pay the overflight rights so I could save three hours when so many people are sacrificing so much more.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: MPC-DM, Enrich-Plat
Posts: 1,310
My guess is they would avoid landing in Russia unless an imminent risk to life existed. I would be surprised if Cathay’s insurers would provide coverage to the plane while on the ground in Russia. In addition, business transactions on the ground (loading fuel, paying landing fees, feeding pax, etc) would be difficult to do under sanctions.
That being said Russia would be likely to treat a Cathay plane well. You can bet they would check the flight manifest thoroughly, however, and would almost certainly arrest any high-profile dissidents on board.
I personally would be fine taking the risk but would rather not support an airline paying flyover fees to Russia.
That being said Russia would be likely to treat a Cathay plane well. You can bet they would check the flight manifest thoroughly, however, and would almost certainly arrest any high-profile dissidents on board.
I personally would be fine taking the risk but would rather not support an airline paying flyover fees to Russia.