![]() |
Originally Posted by Red259
(Post 35080588)
Yes I flew in F on CX from NYC to HKG and back a couple of times. Once on the way back to NYC I was the only passenger in the whole F section so it felt like having my own private jet. Hopefully they will restore F to this route in the future.
|
Originally Posted by dparkinson
(Post 35088185)
Are there any estimates for a timeline on the return of JFK?
|
Originally Posted by dparkinson
(Post 35088185)
Are there any estimates for a timeline on the return of JFK?
Originally Posted by Red259
(Post 35093803)
No. Will probably come back eventually but I think they only have a limited number of planes with first class cabins. You would think NYC would be an in demand market but I guess not as much as I thought.
|
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 35095029)
Could it be that CX is concerned about flying 77W over Russian airspace, and a 77W cannot reliably serve JFK non-stop w/o using Russian airspace?
|
Originally Posted by ernestnywang
(Post 35095029)
Could it be that CX is concerned about flying 77W over Russian airspace, and a 77W cannot reliably serve JFK non-stop w/o using Russian airspace?
|
Originally Posted by SFO777
(Post 35095044)
Not sure that would be a reason since China and Russia are allies.
Originally Posted by dw
(Post 35095067)
Aside from the fact that they’re flying over that airspace now, last year when they were avoiding it, the A350s out of JFK also had to make tech stops sometimes (I recall seeing LAX or TPE) for fuel.
|
Could it be because CX is partly owned by the British?
|
I will throw another theory out there - the NYC route is very popular for certain industries, eg finance, and F cabins pre-covid were normally full or nearly full but more from Op-Ups and BUs, so pure revenue F seats were probably a lower percentage of the total than the equivalent to LAX for example, which is a route less heavily laden with bankers who don't pay for F revenue seats unless very senior. For LHR, also a banker heavy route, there are more flights, so probably easier to justify more F seats, whether pure revenue or only part-revenue.
Just a theory. |
Well those of us here long enough know business heavy routes are easier to score First seats due to ability to price discriminate work travel/leisure travel.
|
Will be flying F to LAX this week! Looking forward to seeing what service is like. Anyone else flying? I'll be sharing pictures with you all soon
|
Originally Posted by pol212
(Post 35119533)
Will be flying F to LAX this week! Looking forward to seeing what service is like. Anyone else flying? I'll be sharing pictures with you all soon
|
Its pleasing to see the available 367-Er available fleet increasing every few weeks. B-KPA out of Alice springs on the way back to HK this morning
I noticed a comment by 'boybi' up thread that perhaps needs amplification Cathay Pacific has been (and still is) a British controlled and operated airline - this for the past many decades. Its operated by its major shareholder Swire and ultimately controlled by UK based John Swire and Sons who are perhaps interestingly one of the worlds largest Coca-Cola bottlers and a major player in the farming, property and cold storage industries |
Originally Posted by oldchinahand
(Post 35148003)
Cathay Pacific has been (and still is) a British controlled and operated airline - this for the past many decades.
PS - Speaking of English accents, is the voice on the MTR real? That's like the most elegant English I've ever heard, even more English than in England! |
I fly the airline very frequently ( at times 10 times in a month and have done so since about 1976.)
I totally disagree that the service style or delivery post or prior to 1997 was different when attending to us Brits. To be frank l I consider the above to be absolute nonsense - it just did not happen. Of course at the time and for many years prior all of the cc were Asian drawn from 7or 8 countries with most totally unable to tell one accent from another. Yes the MTR voice is real - there was an article in the SCMP a few years back about the person behind the voice. |
Originally Posted by oldchinahand
(Post 35148003)
Its pleasing to see the available 367-Er available fleet increasing every few weeks. B-KPA out of Alice springs on the way back to HK this morning
I noticed a comment by 'boybi' up thread that perhaps needs amplification Cathay Pacific has been (and still is) a British controlled and operated airline - this for the past many decades. Its operated by its major shareholder Swire and ultimately controlled by UK based John Swire and Sons who are perhaps interestingly one of the worlds largest Coca-Cola bottlers and a major player in the farming, property and cold storage industries https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/35045334-post137.html Cx is operated by CX, it is not a British operated airline, but a HK airline. The word "controlled" is quite vague. No doubt that the "British" side have a strong voice at CX, whatever it means. But I would never go as far as saying that it is "controlled" by the British. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:30 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.