![]() |
I would like to thank CX for prompt refunds, and great service, despite the times and circumstances they're under. I feel sorry for them.
These Chinese government people seem outright bullies, making stupid decisions just because they can, and to whom their own authority matters more than any logic or reasonability of outcomes. So primitive. The Chinese government even tried to cover up the new SARS-CoV-2 virus when it emerged, bullying the hero Dr Li Wenliang because to prevent information about the government incompetence mattered more than creating this worldwide problem. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51364382 |
Originally Posted by mosfet
(Post 33030331)
This also seems totally counter-intuitive in relation to this news.
One has to be pragmatic if flying is allowed. The big risk to FAs is during meal service, especially in economy. Pax remove their masks to eat/dring while FAs pass their trays and drinks, and come close to the pax. Sleeping while lying down in J/F is of little risk to a FA as they don't come close to the pax. When a FA brings me anything in J, I always put my mask back on. |
Originally Posted by etkuo
(Post 33031397)
End of May 2021 or 2022? lol. If it's 2021 I think it's pretty unlikely to happen unfortunately...
|
And unless you are a HK resident and willing to undergo 21 days strict quarantine, it is totally improbable that you can fly to HK.
|
Originally Posted by brunos
(Post 33032056)
And unless you are a HK resident and willing to undergo 21 days strict quarantine, it is totally improbable that you can fly to HK.
Thank you for your headsup. I do check both boxes, HK resident and willing to undergo quarantine. (am actually relocating back to HK) |
Originally Posted by patrickw
(Post 33031121)
Unless there is a different quarantine policy for "safe" destinations or a travel bubble, there is no difference for AKL to any other outport for CX in terms of crew scheduling perspectives.
if/once the dedicated bubble flights are up and running to somewhere like Singapore it should be possible to operate these outside of the quarantine system |
The problem with all this is that countries aren't yet looking how to co-exist with Covid-19, they are only looking to prevent and get to 0 cases. Hong Kong is clearly not even considering a clear pathway to resume international travel. I understand this to an extent - yes holidays, foreigners etc should be banned. Yes quarantine should be in place - let's try to preserve the normal of day-to-day society within HK. But there is also a balancing act: Economies, Global commerce, cargo etc. and I just find HK Gov is going over the top. How many cases have been contributed to CX crew abroad - and of those how many were then passed on into the community?
Right now CX crew basically self isolate in foreign port hotel rooms, when they come back they have several tests + isolate for a few days at home and are driven privately/directly home. Foreign crew are required to stay within their hotel I think while layover in HK. We have Flight bans from places like UK/Brazil/South Africa - totally get banning their citizens as part of the non essential travel policy - but HKSAR passport holders / residents? These residents would be subject to a pre-departure test, an arrival test at HKG, then at least one more test before finishing 21 day quarantine. I think its practically not heard of to incubate the disease much longer than 14 days. Personally a 14 day Quarantine for less dangerous countries and a 21 day for more dangerous countries would suffice. I mean right now someone flying from Auckland to HK has to undergo all these tests and 21 days hotel quarantine, despite coming from a place with 0 cases. It just speaks to me that HK Gov don't have any strategy to how they will open their borders and allow travel to resume gradually or safely. I don't know if this is political or purely paranoia re importing cases, but this next step to ask crew to also do the quarantine is just crazy - unless there have been so many incidents of crew catching and passing on the virus... |
Originally Posted by CX828
(Post 33032439)
The problem with all this is that countries aren't yet looking how to co-exist with Covid-19, they are only looking to prevent and get to 0 cases. Hong Kong is clearly not even considering a clear pathway to resume international travel. I understand this to an extent - yes holidays, foreigners etc should be banned. Yes quarantine should be in place - let's try to preserve the normal of day-to-day society within HK. But there is also a balancing act: Economies, Global commerce, cargo etc. and I just find HK Gov is going over the top. How many cases have been contributed to CX crew abroad - and of those how many were then passed on into the community?
Right now CX crew basically self isolate in foreign port hotel rooms, when they come back they have several tests + isolate for a few days at home and are driven privately/directly home. Foreign crew are required to stay within their hotel I think while layover in HK. We have Flight bans from places like UK/Brazil/South Africa - totally get banning their citizens as part of the non essential travel policy - but HKSAR passport holders / residents? These residents would be subject to a pre-departure test, an arrival test at HKG, then at least one more test before finishing 21 day quarantine. I think its practically not heard of to incubate the disease much longer than 14 days. Personally a 14 day Quarantine for less dangerous countries and a 21 day for more dangerous countries would suffice. I mean right now someone flying from Auckland to HK has to undergo all these tests and 21 days hotel quarantine, despite coming from a place with 0 cases. It just speaks to me that HK Gov don't have any strategy to how they will open their borders and allow travel to resume gradually or safely. I don't know if this is political or purely paranoia re importing cases, but this next step to ask crew to also do the quarantine is just crazy - unless there have been so many incidents of crew catching and passing on the virus... China opening to HK alone is worth more than opening to the rest of the world in the current political climate. HK people better wake up who is their master. Hint, it is not western. The time has long passed. |
Originally Posted by freed0m
(Post 33032557)
it is very obvious that HK government looks to close the border in hope of China opening border to HK.
China opening to HK alone is worth more than opening to the rest of the world in the current political climate. HK people better wake up who is their master. Hint, it is not western. The time has long passed. HK people better wake up who is their master. Hint, it is not western. The time has long passed This is just an unnecessary statement. No one in this thread nor in the SAR of Hong Kong for that matter is under any illusion on the internal affairs of HK and China. And for all it is worth I don't think HK would consider itself to have been under any Western master for many years. My original comments are commenting on the lack of clear vision for mapping HK out of the current COVID-19 restrictions. For now these should be considered totally separate matters. HK has good reason to have strong border restrictions to protect its society. The question on hand is how far should these go, and what road map could the government draw up to gradually loosen these to facilitate some movement in the future. I suggest you join another forum if you wish to insinuate political commentary. |
Originally Posted by CX828
(Post 33032635)
I get the hope of opening to China... but then why not road map to that. We still have quarantine requirements for China, Mainlanders cannot yet visit HK, and I don't believe air crew from Air China, China Southern etc. are required to do mandatory hotel quarantine when finishing assignments. I also believe there are still flights operating between UK and SA and China...
HK people better wake up who is their master. Hint, it is not western. The time has long passed This is just an unnecessary statement. No one in this thread nor in the SAR of Hong Kong for that matter is under any illusion on the internal affairs of HK and China. And for all it is worth I don't think HK would consider itself to have been under any Western master for many years. My original comments are commenting on the lack of clear vision for mapping HK out of the current COVID-19 restrictions. For now these should be considered totally separate matters. HK has good reason to have strong border restrictions to protect its society. The question on hand is how far should these go, and what road map could the government draw up to gradually loosen these to facilitate some movement in the future. I suggest you join another forum if you wish to insinuate political commentary. it is easier to just slowly seal the border and let the reality sink in. |
Originally Posted by CX828
(Post 33032635)
HK people better wake up who is their master. Hint, it is not western. The time has long passed
This is just an unnecessary statement. No one in this thread nor in the SAR of Hong Kong for that matter is under any illusion on the internal affairs of HK and China. And for all it is worth I don't think HK would consider itself to have been under any Western master for many years. My original comments are commenting on the lack of clear vision for mapping HK out of the current COVID-19 restrictions. For now these should be considered totally separate matters. HK has good reason to have strong border restrictions to protect its society. The question on hand is how far should these go, and what road map could the government draw up to gradually loosen these to facilitate some movement in the future. I suggest you join another forum if you wish to insinuate political commentary. |
Originally Posted by freed0m
(Post 33032557)
HK people better wake up who is their master. Hint, it is not western. The time has long passed.
Governments are meant to protect their residents and favour their "own" (interstate borders/border with China) but to what extent are measures no longer scientific but grandstanding? |
I have a business trip and need to know if CX will extend these cancelations to after March 28. Any clue on when CX will update its schedule for March 28 onwards? Thankss!
|
Originally Posted by ma930407
(Post 33034446)
I have a business trip and need to know if CX will extend these cancelations to after March 28. Any clue on when CX will update its schedule for March 28 onwards? Thankss!
The new schedule is quite complicated to be put in place with the crew scheduling. They will need time to readjust once HK decides to relax the measure. I don't see the HK government to do that soon as they try to keep out new dangerous variants. How long this new measure will be in place is impossible to tell. I would be surprised if it will not remain in place for quite a few months. |
Originally Posted by ma930407
(Post 33034446)
I have a business trip and need to know if CX will extend these cancelations to after March 28. Any clue on when CX will update its schedule for March 28 onwards? Thankss!
(Flights to 28 Mar have already been cut, so by this date you get beyond March?) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:16 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.