Cathay Pacific losses snowball to HK$1.25 billion, first back-to-back loss in 71-year
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SQ, BA, TG, Sheba, VN, MPO since 1980
Posts: 1,058
Cathay Pacific losses snowball to HK$1.25 billion, first back-to-back loss in 71-year
#2
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,689
One wonders how much spending/depreciation/losses were brought forward to make 2017 look bad (and to also be able to blame things on the failed Ivan Chu) so there can then be a turnaround in 2018 which makes Rupert look good.
#3
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
But we'll be looking at yield first and foremost, I suppose. Harder to fudge that.
#4
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,421
the airline itself is profitable excluding the errors on fuel and forward losses
also for someone that is obsessed about LCC's and striving to be treated like cattle , you would want yield to fall...
#5
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
Second time you've made a point that's illogical https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...l#post29392522
Last edited by percysmith; Mar 13, 2018 at 7:52 am
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,566
An article full of common sense:
Cathay Pacific is a case study in how most companies fail in the long run ? if they don?t change | South China Morning Post
Cathay Pacific is a case study in how most companies fail in the long run ? if they don?t change | South China Morning Post
#7
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: Marco Polo Club, KF
Posts: 208
An article full of common sense:
Cathay Pacific is a case study in how most companies fail in the long run ? if they don?t change South China Morning Post
Cathay Pacific is a case study in how most companies fail in the long run ? if they don?t change South China Morning Post
#8
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
Cathay is the victim of their own failures and the fierce competition from mainland airlines. Own failures such as fuel hedges that make no sense, not aggressively going after the China market (could be limited by Beijing so not really their fault), offended and pushed out their most loyal fliers that were willing to pay premium prices with them to keep status, branding itself as luxury airline but cuts services, etc. However, Cathay is also in a tough spot when mainland airlines are selling all cabins are ridiculously low prices.
One would think Cathay wants to secure their home turf, Hong Kong, by offering competitive prices in and out of Hong Kong. But rather, in reality, if departure/destination is Hong Kong it is usually the most expensive. Some people claimed this is because Cathay has strong yields for Hong Kong traffic so there's no pressure to deflate prices. However, on the last 3 business trips I fly with Cathay in and out of Hong Kong, the air craft is pretty empty, a quick glare back to the Y class shows it to be virtually deserted. It could be the exception, and the 6 days I was traveling were happen to be low-yield days, but I don't ever remember seeing a situation like this in my 30 years of flying with Cathay.
Really to win people back is simple: increase product and service quality, reasonable fares, and attractive FFP. But again and again airlines decided to go price war and the industry seems to be like a race to LCC.
One would think Cathay wants to secure their home turf, Hong Kong, by offering competitive prices in and out of Hong Kong. But rather, in reality, if departure/destination is Hong Kong it is usually the most expensive. Some people claimed this is because Cathay has strong yields for Hong Kong traffic so there's no pressure to deflate prices. However, on the last 3 business trips I fly with Cathay in and out of Hong Kong, the air craft is pretty empty, a quick glare back to the Y class shows it to be virtually deserted. It could be the exception, and the 6 days I was traveling were happen to be low-yield days, but I don't ever remember seeing a situation like this in my 30 years of flying with Cathay.
Really to win people back is simple: increase product and service quality, reasonable fares, and attractive FFP. But again and again airlines decided to go price war and the industry seems to be like a race to LCC.
#9
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
Cathay Pacific losses snowball to HK$1.25 billion, first back-to-back loss in 71-year history
Cathay Pacific racks up first back-to-back loss in 71-year history, at HK$1.25 billion | South China Morning Post
Cathay Pacific racks up first back-to-back loss in 71-year history, at HK$1.25 billion | South China Morning Post
#11
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
Passenger load still roughly constant-0.1% but yield down -3.1%
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/list...0180314155.pdf
http://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/list...0180314155.pdf
#13
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,803
#14
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
They deserve to struggle imo. Heavily government supported competitors in the mainland and the Middle East required a different approach, and instead CX tried their hardest to just do the same thing. They tried to push their own government influences to protect sky high ex-HKG fares, at the expense of focus elsewhere, and its bitten them. It will be a tough turnaround but i think they still have enough reputation and product quality to do it.
#15
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,421
The way to achieve the former/improve the latter is to stop being a slot hog and cut back? VA's complaining about HKG slot unavailability https://www.ausbt.com.au/virgin-aust...edule-shake-up
anyone who thinks more competition = higher profits is retarded
especially if the slots are going to airlines that do not have to post a profit on that route