Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Dec 9 CX889

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2002 | 1:18 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB PLT again afater a decade as plebian
Posts: 22,944
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by B747-437B:
I'm not familiar with the NZ 767 incident, but the CX incident was a fully contained failure. Uncontained failures are EXTREMELY rare occurances and usually warrant an immediate diversion and grounding of the aircraft.
</font>
The CX incident seems to have been blown out of proportion more than it was if the failure was contained? The NZ 767 indicent was rather severe with engine, wing and engine mount perforations. Very closeup pictures were pubished on a webpage that has since been pulled.

Was this the same type of incident (and engine) that resulted in the US 762 being written off?
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2002 | 1:32 pm
  #17  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 16,064
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by terenz:
The CX incident seems to have been blown out of proportion more than it was if the failure was contained? The NZ 767 indicent was rather severe with engine, wing and engine mount perforations. Was this the same type of incident (and engine) that resulted in the US 762 being written off? </font>
The CX incident was blown way out of proportion. The flight suffered a simple inflight shutdown and didn't even divert, but rather continued on to its destination of JFK where it was fixed and returned home within 2 days.

Yes, the NZ and US incidents were with the same type of engine and aircraft.
B747-437B is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2002 | 5:13 pm
  #18  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,724
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by terenz:
The a/c is question was reported as having returned to HKG last week. I doubt if CX does keep a spare in JFK. Perhaps it was a freighter (it would have the small bubble of a 747-100/200).</font>
That is probaly it except for i thought i saw winglets.
audio-nut is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2002 | 6:13 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB PLT again afater a decade as plebian
Posts: 22,944
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by audio-nut:
That is probaly it except for i thought i saw winglets.</font>
747-400Fs have the small bubble but have the -400 wing (so they have winglets).
YVR Cockroach is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.