|
Should I take 12A or 12k or stay put in 14 k ?
See attached I've no status Is it possible at this stage a parent and baby could be put there and I booted out? Flight is this week https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...af2fc5545e.jpg Thanks |
Personally would take 14.
|
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 31647235)
Personally would take 14.
Staying where I am for now,I think |
Originally Posted by Earthman
(Post 31647217)
Should I take 12A or 12k or stay put in 14 k ?
See attached I've no status Is it possible at this stage a parent and baby could be put there and I booted out? Flight is this week Thanks There really is no bad seat, besides 11 D/G, in the A359 J cabin. Others can nitpick over partial windows, etc. but none of that bothers me. There have been major complaints about the A359 have been the wear and finish of the cabin and seats when the product was first introduced. Many of those issues seems to have been addressed. I do still find seats misaligned sometimes causing some difficulty in reclining. |
Originally Posted by Arbeysix
(Post 31577376)
There's no difference in the two AFAIK.
Originally Posted by kevin.cash
(Post 31575419)
J seats on A350 are all very comfortable in my experience, but I wonder there is any difference between A350-900 and A350-1000 PE seats. A350-1000 seems slightly bigger and has a bette recline?
|
Originally Posted by jbielsker
(Post 31787824)
Do all PE seats on the A350 have the footrest, or is it just in the bulkhead as on the 77W?
See pictures here: https://samchui.com/2019/10/06/premi.../#.XeGVDr30lAY |
Originally Posted by etkuo
(Post 31788580)
|
Originally Posted by etkuo
(Post 31788580)
|
Originally Posted by bluetus04
(Post 31788939)
I wonder why the amenity kits in the pictures look like those handed out in J? I've never received kits like that in PEY.
|
Originally Posted by bluetus04
(Post 31788939)
I wonder why the amenity kits in the pictures look like those handed out in J? I've never received kits like that in PEY.
Originally Posted by etkuo
(Post 31788999)
Interesting. Good catch. I don't know wonder whether this is a promotion picture from CX.
|
That blogger in particular.
|
Originally Posted by synthkeys
(Post 31614786)
Having tried the Gogo WiFi on 773 during my last flight, it is definitely superior to the Panasonic WiFi offered on the A350. I usually fly CX890 back to the US, which probably flies a similar route as CX857 (unless it's a rare polar route). I experience issues mid-flight also, where I keep having to re-login and sometimes doesn't work for a spell. It's possible there are some dead spots on the route. I never considered a maximum threshold of users.
Originally Posted by synthkeys
(Post 31615146)
Just checked the last week worth of flights on CX857, the only one to take a polar route was the Monday Oct-7 departure. So unless the poster flew on that date, there shouldn't have been any internet blackout on the usual cross Pacific route. When the A350 was first introduced for the EWR flights, and internet service was new, it seemed much better. I have also noticed a degradation of service on the returns to EWR this past year, which hardly ever take polar route. Now I'm starting to think this may be due to Wifi overcrowding as pax have become accustomed to the service.
Originally Posted by jonnyz1245
(Post 31615388)
Yup, the flight was Oct 9. We definitely did not take the polar route. cruised straight across the pacific. According to the ISM, and at first I didn't believe her but now I do, she thought it was due to 65 people being logged in at once and that the system couldn't handle more. Poor planning in this day and age if that's true.
The 777 has faster WiFi and less dead spots. I often go 2-3 hours with no WiFi on the 350 fyi - all flights were on the sfo-Hkg-sfo sectors so there was no polar route or Russian airspace involved |
Originally Posted by etkuo
(Post 31788999)
Interesting. Good catch. I don't know wonder whether this is a promotion picture from CX.
Has anyone boarded a flight with the amenity kit lined up so close to perfection? |
Apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere or in this thread, but are there plans to retrofit the A359 Economy seats with the seats found on the A35K? I thought I recall hearing complaints about the A359 Economy seating (nowhere as bad as the fixed-shell fiasco, but I just heard they were not comfortable, especially the padding).
|
Originally Posted by CLT
(Post 31810693)
Apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere or in this thread, but are there plans to retrofit the A359 Economy seats with the seats found on the A35K? I thought I recall hearing complaints about the A359 Economy seating (nowhere as bad as the fixed-shell fiasco, but I just heard they were not comfortable, especially the padding).
Separately, ORD looking to go A350 in 2020. Unknown if 35G/35J. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:20 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.