Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

IDB in the US - do DOT compensations apply?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IDB in the US - do DOT compensations apply?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 1:13 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 200
IDB in the US - do DOT compensations apply?

My friend was just involuntarily denied boarding at JFK because the flight was oversold. He is Diamond on a business class award ticket. The next available flight is in 24 hours. Surprised he was even bumped given his status...but anyway:

According to DOT rules, he should be entitled to 400% the base fare (up to $1,300) given the length of delay. Award ticket fares are calculated on the lowest available fare at the time of bump, which should easily be a few thousand dollars in J. However, CX airport staff claimed that the DOT rules don't apply to foreign carriers. Is this true? I was under the impression that these rules apply to all flights departing from the US regardless of carrier nationality? Has anyone been IDBed on CX out of the US?
Fc912 is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 1:36 am
  #2  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 642
I'm pretty sure they apply to CX for flights originating in the US. Did CX not provide him with the IDB handout? That's a big no-no with the DOT.
blahter is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 1:40 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
This is the first time I heard CX denied boarding to a MPC member, let alone a DM. Was he on a CX award?

Anyway, when did he get to the check-in counter? When was he at the gate?
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 1:47 am
  #4  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 200
Sorry this actually happened at EWR. Not JFK. Got mixed up.

Originally Posted by blahter
I'm pretty sure they apply to CX for flights originating in the US. Did CX not provide him with the IDB handout? That's a big no-no with the DOT.
Nope. Nothing from the staff
Fc912 is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 1:47 am
  #5  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 200
Originally Posted by cxfan1960
This is the first time I heard CX denied boarding to a MPC member, let alone a DM. Was he on a CX award?

Anyway, when did he get to the check-in counter? When was he at the gate?
Just spoke to him on the phone - the staff went to the BA lounge to find him (and a few others who were also denied boarding).
Fc912 is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 1:52 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by Fc912
Just spoke to him on the phone - the staff went to the BA lounge to find him (and a few others who were also denied boarding).
So he and the others already had BPs. How long before the flight did that happen?
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 3:55 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SPG Pt, Le Club Accor GO, Shangri-La GC Jade
Posts: 1,327
Originally Posted by cxfan1960
So he and the others already had BPs. How long before the flight did that happen?
Probably due to a last minute sickness of crew (see Secret... seems this is not uncommon these days) thus need to cut away some passengers....
sscywong is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 11:05 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by sscywong
Probably due to a last minute sickness of crew (see Secret... seems this is not uncommon these days) thus need to cut away some passengers....
I would imagine they may cancel a flight for crew sickness, but IDBing some passengers?
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 11:48 am
  #9  
50 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: AA,CX, BA, Priority Club, SPG, Hilton
Posts: 1,421
very surprised... IDB for a DM ?? wow.. I thought they will only do this to non-elite.
Fly2Where is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 12:00 pm
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
Yes, the DOT rules do apply to CX on flights originating in the US and yes, the rules do apply to award tickets (referred to as "zero dollar"), and yes the likely compensation would be $1,300 (presuming that the cheapest ticket cost more than $325.

But, if the reason for the denial of boarding was crewmember illness resulting in the need to offload some number of passengers, CX may escape having to pay any compensation by asserting "operational or safety reasons" under 14 CFR 250.6.

The rules require that CX first seek volunteers and then offload passengers in some predetermined order. That could include fare paid, cabin class, status and so on, but it must be predetermined.

OP's friend should make a request to CX for compensation in the amount of US$1,300 (cash), wait a few days and then file a complaint with DOT. This can all be done online. Keep the complaint simple and to the point, e.g., "I was scheduled to fly on CX XXX on Date Y and was involuntarily denied boarding and rescheduled for 24 hours later. I requested and was denied compensation. CX did not request volunteers."

The rest is all fluff.
Often1 is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 4:25 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
As of today, the current IDB compensation is $1350 per DOT.
garykung is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 8:08 pm
  #12  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,239
OP: please return and give some more details! I am shocked to hear this.

There must be more to this story....given pax were already in the lounge with BPs, and the IDB pax were in J, and the IDB pax is DM...! Nuts. I have to imagine either there was an utterly massive screw up by the check-in agents, or some extremely bizarre situation happened with crew, weight issues, security issues, or something else.

I mean, there is just no way (in my mind) CX would chose to IDB a Diamond, particularly from the lounge after a BP is issued. In this already-unfortunate circumstance I'd expect them to at least offload a nonstatus passenger. Unless, of course, the DM was the sole award ticket on the flight in J, which I find remarkably unlikely. 40 J seats on 77G, there has to be someone CX would rather offload on that flight than a DM on an award ticket.
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Dec 23, 2015 | 4:51 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SPG Pt, Le Club Accor GO, Shangri-La GC Jade
Posts: 1,327
Originally Posted by QRC3288
I mean, there is just no way (in my mind) CX would chose to IDB a Diamond, particularly from the lounge after a BP is issued. In this already-unfortunate circumstance I'd expect them to at least offload a nonstatus passenger. Unless, of course, the DM was the sole award ticket on the flight in J, which I find remarkably unlikely. 40 J seats on 77G, there has to be someone CX would rather offload on that flight than a DM on an award ticket.
My recent experience told me DM rank may not be as important as fare class...

e.g. Once I flew HKG-TPE in V and I saw some (two) SL op-up and I remained in Y... Weeks later I flew again in Y and I got op-up

Since I still have no idea about CIV score (tie with individual or different for each flight for every individual), I always suspect fare class plays an important role in op-up/DB decision... So if OP gets a pure award ticket, OP probably has a very low score from fare class (upgrade award has a price at least) and so low that even DM status can't help (or OP's CIV is too low )
sscywong is offline  
Old Dec 23, 2015 | 5:15 am
  #14  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,239
Originally Posted by sscywong
My recent experience told me DM rank may not be as important as fare class...

e.g. Once I flew HKG-TPE in V and I saw some (two) SL op-up and I remained in Y... Weeks later I flew again in Y and I got op-up

Since I still have no idea about CIV score (tie with individual or different for each flight for every individual), I always suspect fare class plays an important role in op-up/DB decision... So if OP gets a pure award ticket, OP probably has a very low score from fare class (upgrade award has a price at least) and so low that even DM status can't help (or OP's CIV is too low )
I agree on DMs vs CIV and perhaps DM doesn't carry the weight we've hoped/speculated, but let's take a few scenarios.
1) this pax was on an award ticket. I find it hard to believe he was the only award ticket out of 40 J seats, no ID pax, etc. If he was on an AM award ticket, as long as there was a single pax of lower status also on an AM ticket, or anyone on a partner award ticket, ID pax, etc (aka lower value + lower revenue to CX) he wouldn't have been the lowest value pax in that class.
2) let's say okay, this DM even was the sole award booking or for whatever reason the lowest cost base ticket in J that day. I think unlikely but let's roll with it.....however I think this follow on is simply impossible: he had one of the lowest, or the lowest, CIV of anyone on the plane. (!?!). This has gotta be impossible. Couldn't they first propose to IDB this DM down to PEY, and bump a lower cost base fare pax from EY or PEY? The guy is DM, after all. Yes not all DMs are created equal but at an absolute bare bones minimum, you gotta contribute at least 10k USD a year (not to mention the time spent working up to it). There is no way a DM has the lowest CIV on the plane! Absolutely impossible. Yes tiers can be arbitraged and some guys contribute more than others, but no matter what a DM is going to be at least on the upper quartile of value to CX on that plane, and certainly not near the bottom or dead last!

This is why methinks there is more to the story. Maybe there are some missing details. Or there has to be some type of extraordinary situation. Perhaps the EWR ground staff completely, utterly effed up as they say, or perhaps there is some really bizarre situation that occured we (and perhaps the OP and his/her friend) haven't figured out yet.

I've only had the (dis)pleasure of engaging with the EWR ground staff twice and I wouldn't put it past them for being utter idiots but....this story is pretty out there! I mean I've heard of lower status pax getting upgraded, but I think that's in a totally different league no? I mean this DM got IDB, and from J class, on a once a day, 16 hour flight to boot!
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Dec 23, 2015 | 11:08 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by sscywong
My recent experience told me DM rank may not be as important as fare class...

e.g. Once I flew HKG-TPE in V and I saw some (two) SL op-up and I remained in Y... Weeks later I flew again in Y and I got op-up

Since I still have no idea about CIV score (tie with individual or different for each flight for every individual), I always suspect fare class plays an important role in op-up/DB decision... So if OP gets a pure award ticket, OP probably has a very low score from fare class (upgrade award has a price at least) and so low that even DM status can't help (or OP's CIV is too low )
In my last trip to Asia, I purchased V for all four segments but never sat in Y. I was op-upped twice to PEY on long hauls, once to J on a short haul, and once sitting in the J section as a Y passenger.

I was op-upped to J on a S, N or Q (I forgot which one) ticket in May. Fare class may be a factor in CIV score, but that may be fare classes for flights over a period of time.

But on IDB, I have not even been asked for VDB!

Last edited by cxfan1960; Dec 23, 2015 at 11:15 am Reason: Add comment on IDB/VDB.
cxfan1960 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.