![]() |
New website prototype
Just got another survey on new website. CX is once again working on prototyping a new website UI. Below are some of the screenshots of the prototype. It definitely looks more modern than the current one but still needs some more fine tuning to improve usability.
https://www.cathaypacificinsights.co...X_Homepage.jpg https://www.cathaypacificinsights.co...tion_hotel.jpg https://www.cathaypacificinsights.co...nfirmation.jpg |
Was the survey strictly about design/UI, or did they also ask what browser and platform users prefers?
|
I don't think their current design is the problem, the key problem is still that some underlying functionality is still not functional.
Probably more important for them to resolve the functionality before they overhaul the design again.. |
Their logo is way too small.
Last pic, "duration" and "leaving" is mixed up :D |
Originally Posted by intuition
(Post 21648145)
Was the survey strictly about design/UI, or did they also ask what browser and platform users prefers?
|
Not sure if I like the dreamy narrative about the package. "Imagine it now....blah blah" And then commenting on the time of year? If you are travelling in Winter to London ... "Being January, it's going to be f..king freezing, and you'll be regretting booking your honeymoon to this god forsaken wintry location. And we haven't even mentioned how Heathrow will be if you get some winter wonderland show."
|
Interesting that CX have put this out in the public domain. I have worked with the design agency that are doing the new look and they normally test it with focus groups.
|
Whether it's new UI or old UI the most important thing is ease of use. The current UI simply stinks in that department. People go online not to look at cool images or cool functionalities. For an airline website they want ease of attaining information, reserve flight, and manage their reservations.
|
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
(Post 21648419)
Whether it's new UI or old UI the most important thing is ease of use. The current UI simply stinks in that department. People go online not to look at cool images or cool functionalities. For an airline website they want ease of attaining information, reserve flight, and manage their reservations.
The agency CX are using one of the best at getting the user experience right and will have learnt from doing a number of other airline sites they have done..... ;) |
Originally Posted by Speedbird218
(Post 21648417)
Interesting that CX have put this out in the public domain. I have worked with the design agency that are doing the new look and they normally test it with focus groups.
|
Originally Posted by Speedbird218
(Post 21648459)
The agency CX are using one of the best at getting the user experience right and will have learnt from doing a number of other airline sites they have done..... ;)
I think aa.com is probably one of the better airline websites (wish I could be as complementary about the inflight experience!). Info is front and centre, prominent, clean, and easy to read and use. |
These will be early designs...lot of changes tend to happen as the design team refine things, take feedback from the client and any user testing they do.
|
Originally Posted by Speedbird218
(Post 21648459)
number of other airline sites they have done..... ;)
|
Originally Posted by jagmeets
(Post 21648579)
I hope you don't mean the clusterF of a website that some call SQ.com
|
I hope they are working on similar revamping of their app :(
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:48 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.