Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Revised free baggage allowances

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 5:45 am
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Diamond (OW Emerald), former SQ Krisflyer Gold
Posts: 2,611
Revised free baggage allowances

Revised free baggage allowances and extra baggage charges for itineraries involving other airlines

In compliance with the new baggage policy issued by the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the way free baggage allowances and extra baggage charges are calculated has changed. These changes apply to tickets issued on or after 1 April 2011, which involve one or more flights operated by airlines other than Cathay Pacific and Dragonair. Please contact your travel agent or local reservations office for more details from 1 April 2011.
Saw this on the MPC website. Any ideas what the new rules are?
midlevels is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 8:00 am
  #2  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BA Gold, JGC Sapphire, OZ Diamond, AF Silver, CX GR, Marriott Lifetime SL
Posts: 3,598
I suspect is a switch to bag based system. JAL already announced the switch.
ChrisLi is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2011 | 9:29 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: HKG
Programs: CX Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Plat
Posts: 422
From a search on the IATA website, the way how interline baggage allowance and associated excess charges are calculated will be changed. The allowance will be based on the rules of the 'most significant carrier' of the itinerary.

This (and the message above) implies that the allowance and charges for CX-only itinerary will not be affected at this time.
hadsst is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 7:28 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,641
This announcement by CX is ridiculous. Either tell us what the changes are, or wait until 1 April to announce what the changes are. Telling us there are going to be changes, without telling us what they are, is completely useless.
Top of climb is online now  
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 8:59 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Originally Posted by Top of climb
This announcement by CX is ridiculous. Either tell us what the changes are, or wait until 1 April to announce what the changes are. Telling us there are going to be changes, without telling us what they are, is completely useless.
I agree. In addition, why is it on the MPC page but not on CX main page?
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 6:45 am
  #6  
sxc
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,797
I hope this means that flights where CX connects to another airline for a short hop means that Marco Polo allowances will apply for the whole route. In the past when connecting to/from BA for UK connections, there has always been aggro when checking in with BA.
sxc is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 8:35 am
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: Star Alliance, One World, Skyteam, BR, GA, EK, VX, SPG, Marriott, Hyatt, Hilton, IC
Posts: 4,067
I've booked and ticketed my booking a couple of days ago and had multiple airlines contained in the booking.

Can anyone give me a link on IATA's announcement?
General_Flyer is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 12:19 pm
  #8  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by sxc
I hope this means that flights where CX connects to another airline for a short hop means that Marco Polo allowances will apply for the whole route. In the past when connecting to/from BA for UK connections, there has always been aggro when checking in with BA.
I never had a problem going CX --> MU with baggage weight or numbers (3). However, I do run into trouble on the return trip if I don't lower the baggage weight or number (down to 2), last time MU wanted 400RMB out of me!
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2011 | 4:46 am
  #9  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: HKG
Programs: CX Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Plat
Posts: 422
CX press release on this issue, with some examples on how the interline allowance / excess fee will change.

http://www.cathaypacific.com/cpa/en_...000ad21c39____

The definition of the 'most significant carrier' and further examples are available here.

http://www.cathaypacific.com/cpa/en_...000ad21c39RCRD

Last edited by hadsst; Mar 30, 2011 at 4:53 am
hadsst is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2011 | 7:21 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
Although rules are better defined now, they are getting more complicated.
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Mar 30, 2011 | 5:13 pm
  #11  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
Originally Posted by cxfan1960
Although rules are better defined now, they are getting more complicated.
They better have good IT to do it automatically for the check-in agents. I doubt they will master this "MSC" rule on crossing tariff regions, and there will be many arguments from pax who knows the rules vs. ignorant check-in agents who doesn't know the rules and want to charge excess baggage allowance from pax.
Cathay Boy is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 7:20 pm
  #12  
sxc
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,797
Unfortunately there is no specific mention that I could find that says that marco polo benefits apply across the whole journey when CX is the most siginificant carrier. I hope I don't come across arguing with BA when checking in at a UK domestic airport.
sxc is offline  
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 7:29 pm
  #13  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,641
Originally Posted by sxc
Unfortunately there is no specific mention that I could find that says that marco polo benefits apply across the whole journey when CX is the most siginificant carrier.
That's an interesting question. Is it that the published baggage rules of the Most Significant Carrier that apply, or the published baggage rules plus any benefits extended by the Most Significant Carrier to the particular passenger?

I suppose the other question is whether this is being taken up by other airlines? IATA resolution or not, I've not seen any word from anyone else that they will be moving to the MSC approach. As far as BA is concerned they might continue to apply their existing rule of first operating carrier.
Top of climb is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.