Cx b777-300er
Dec 18, 2010 | 6:47 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Green
Posts: 878
Cx b777-300er
Should CX use B777-300ER to these routes?
1.CX838/839 (Replacing A340-300, as there are some comments that if A340-300 is used, it would be an unconfortable journey)
2.CX293/292
3.CX107/108
4.CX873/879 (Replacing B747-400)
1.CX838/839 (Replacing A340-300, as there are some comments that if A340-300 is used, it would be an unconfortable journey)
2.CX293/292
3.CX107/108
4.CX873/879 (Replacing B747-400)
Dec 18, 2010 | 6:57 am
#2
Suspended
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A400 Safari/6531.22.7)
I believe fco and yvr are duly 343 destns. AKL needs the pax cap and sfo needs cargo space...
I believe fco and yvr are duly 343 destns. AKL needs the pax cap and sfo needs cargo space...