Question for CX Diamonds
#31


Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
#32
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: Shangri La GC Diamond, Fairmont Platinum, SPG Gold, EVA Gold, AMEX Centurion
Posts: 151
Issue Summary
I am glad that my thread has sparked a lively discussion and debate. Further contributions would be greatly appreciated as well.
Just to clarify a few things from the comments above:
1. Since I live in YOW, it is 2 transit points anyway: with CX it would be YOW-YYZ-HKG-BKK and with NH, it would be YOW-ORD-NRT-BKK. However, it is much faster and easier to go with CX since I avoid the American customs thing, as well as the unpredictable nature of short flight cancellations into and out of Chicago during bad weather.
2. I do not take AC because I had too many bad experiences with their service in J. I used to be a SuperElite and after feeling badly treated, I switched. I am much happier now.
3. I am primarily interestd in flying between Canada and Asia, on a carrier with top notch service (therefore preferably an Asian carrier), and if possible in F. Therefore, the AA programme would give me free CX flights, but I can't use any of their upgrade features.
4. From what you all describe, a central 'power' feature of being a diamond is that you get on flights whenever you want seats, even last minute. This is indeed an excellent feature suited to last minute business travellers, particuarly premium passengers who need to jet across for an important closing... I am not one of those customers. I do fly a lot (150-200K per year) but almost all of it is planned at least a month in advance, and often 2 months. I seldom change the date last minute and my local professional commitments do not permit too many changes. Therefore, this feature of the diamond membership is not useful to me.
So unless there are other features I don't know about (quite possible), the benefit of CX to me would be shorter transit times and avoidance of US customs, and the benefit of NH would be much more generous upgrades.
For me this is a really tough call. The transpac F experience on Asian carriers is really nice, even if you have done it many times before. However, as we all know, long flights with transits can be exhausting, no matter how you do it and so shorter times can make a big difference.
I still don't know...
FF
Just to clarify a few things from the comments above:
1. Since I live in YOW, it is 2 transit points anyway: with CX it would be YOW-YYZ-HKG-BKK and with NH, it would be YOW-ORD-NRT-BKK. However, it is much faster and easier to go with CX since I avoid the American customs thing, as well as the unpredictable nature of short flight cancellations into and out of Chicago during bad weather.
2. I do not take AC because I had too many bad experiences with their service in J. I used to be a SuperElite and after feeling badly treated, I switched. I am much happier now.
3. I am primarily interestd in flying between Canada and Asia, on a carrier with top notch service (therefore preferably an Asian carrier), and if possible in F. Therefore, the AA programme would give me free CX flights, but I can't use any of their upgrade features.
4. From what you all describe, a central 'power' feature of being a diamond is that you get on flights whenever you want seats, even last minute. This is indeed an excellent feature suited to last minute business travellers, particuarly premium passengers who need to jet across for an important closing... I am not one of those customers. I do fly a lot (150-200K per year) but almost all of it is planned at least a month in advance, and often 2 months. I seldom change the date last minute and my local professional commitments do not permit too many changes. Therefore, this feature of the diamond membership is not useful to me.
So unless there are other features I don't know about (quite possible), the benefit of CX to me would be shorter transit times and avoidance of US customs, and the benefit of NH would be much more generous upgrades.
For me this is a really tough call. The transpac F experience on Asian carriers is really nice, even if you have done it many times before. However, as we all know, long flights with transits can be exhausting, no matter how you do it and so shorter times can make a big difference.
I still don't know...
FF
#33
Original Member




Join Date: May 1998
Location: HKG
Programs: BA GGL, CX DM, AA LT GO, Marriott LT Titanium, Shangri-La DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM
Posts: 2,030
if this were indeed true, it's definitely one of the biggest surprises none of us here knew about before...and would make me credit more of my future miles to AAdv instead of MPO/AM...
#34
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
4. From what you all describe, a central 'power' feature of being a diamond is that you get on flights whenever you want seats, even last minute. This is indeed an excellent feature suited to last minute business travellers, particuarly premium passengers who need to jet across for an important closing... I am not one of those customers. I do fly a lot (150-200K per year) but almost all of it is planned at least a month in advance, and often 2 months. I seldom change the date last minute and my local professional commitments do not permit too many changes. Therefore, this feature of the diamond membership is not useful to me.
#35


Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,978
I am glad that my thread has sparked a lively discussion and debate. Further contributions would be greatly appreciated as well.
For me this is a really tough call. The transpac F experience on Asian carriers is really nice, even if you have done it many times before. However, as we all know, long flights with transits can be exhausting, no matter how you do it and so shorter times can make a big difference.
I still don't know...
FF
For me this is a really tough call. The transpac F experience on Asian carriers is really nice, even if you have done it many times before. However, as we all know, long flights with transits can be exhausting, no matter how you do it and so shorter times can make a big difference.
I still don't know...
FF
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: FTFOE
Programs: TalkBoard: We discuss / ad nauseum things that mean / so very little
Posts: 10,225
@FlyingFish: I looked at the numbers. Assuming starting from zero status on AA, after four RTs YYZ-HKG-BKK on CX, you will get to AAdv EXP elite status and will have 135k AA miles, enough for one F award ticket, along with 20 domestic upgrade stickers, and 8 systemwide upgrades. Each additional RT as an EXP will get just under 40k miles. Yes, all those upgrades are only good on AA flights and your priority for op-ups on CX, even as a top-tier EXP, will be lower than if you were a DM, but they aren't zero either.
Definitely, shorter overall flight times and avoiding unnecessary border crossings is a good thing though!
Definitely, shorter overall flight times and avoiding unnecessary border crossings is a good thing though!
#37
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
Upgrade awards are only valid on individual published-fare tickets on flights marketed and operated by American Airlines
My suspicion is that your colleague used AsiaMiles, which can be used to upgrade AA flights booked in YBH.
#38


Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,245
Ugh....this is like pounding on rocks. You have clearly confused AA miles and Asia Miles, and now we have lots of incorrect information on this site to boot. You just cannot upgrade with AA miles. Period. I am not basing this on reading FT - I'm basing it on a colleague who has a hoard of AA miles (quite fewer Asia Miles), boasted to our whole office how much better off he was with his AA miles when using upgrades, until he had to eat his own words HKG-LAX when he showed up at the airport assuming he could upgrade and was told to pay or fork over ASIA MILES. Not AA miles. With AA miles you can buy AWARD tix, and with AA codeshares you can buy a high-fare subclass and upgrade using ASIA MILES (NOT AA MILES!!!!), but what you insist is correct just plain isn't.

